Literature DB >> 24297940

High-dose cytarabine in induction treatment improves the outcome of adult patients younger than age 46 years with acute myeloid leukemia: results of the EORTC-GIMEMA AML-12 trial.

Roelof Willemze1, Stefan Suciu, Giovanna Meloni, Boris Labar, Jean-Pierre Marie, Constantijn J M Halkes, Petra Muus, Martin Mistrik, Sergio Amadori, Giorgina Specchia, Francesco Fabbiano, Francesco Nobile, Marco Sborgia, Andrea Camera, Dominik L D Selleslag, Francois Lefrère, Domenico Magro, Simona Sica, Nicola Cantore, Meral Beksac, Zwi Berneman, Xavier Thomas, Lorella Melillo, Jose E Guimaraes, Pietro Leoni, Mario Luppi, Maria E Mitra, Dominique Bron, Georges Fillet, Erik W A Marijt, Adriano Venditti, Anne Hagemeijer, Marco Mancini, Joop Jansen, Daniela Cilloni, Liv Meert, Paola Fazi, Marco Vignetti, Silvia M Trisolini, Franco Mandelli, Theo de Witte.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cytarabine plays a pivotal role in the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Most centers use 7 to 10 days of cytarabine at a daily dose of 100 to 200 mg/m(2) for remission induction. Consensus has not been reached on the benefit of higher dosages of cytarabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell' Adulto (GIMEMA) Leukemia Groups conducted a randomized trial (AML-12; Combination Chemotherapy, Stem Cell Transplant and Interleukin-2 in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia) in 1,942 newly diagnosed patients with AML, age 15 to 60 years, comparing remission induction treatment containing daunorubicin, etoposide, and either standard-dose (SD) cytarabine (100 mg/m(2) per day by continuous infusion for 10 days) or high-dose (HD) cytarabine (3,000 mg/m(2) every 12 hours by 3-hour infusion on days 1, 3, 5, and 7). Patients in complete remission (CR) received a single consolidation cycle containing daunorubicin and intermediate-dose cytarabine (500 mg/m(2) every 12 hours for 6 days). Subsequently, a stem-cell transplantation was planned. The primary end point was survival.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 6 years, overall survival was 38.7% for patients randomly assigned to SD cytarabine and 42.5% for those randomly assigned to HD cytarabine (log-rank test P = .06; multivariable analysis P = .009). For patients younger than age 46 years, survival was 43.3% and 51.9%, respectively (P = .009; multivariable analysis P = .003), and for patients age 46 to 60 years, survival was 33.9% and 32.9%, respectively (P = .91). CR rates were 72.0% and 78.7%, respectively (P < .001) and were 75.6% and 82.4% for patients younger than age 46 years (P = .01) and 68.3% and 74.8% for patients age 46 years and older (P = .03). Patients of all ages with very-bad-risk cytogenetic abnormalities and/or FLT3-ITD (internal tandem duplication) mutation, or with secondary AML benefitted from HD cytarabine.
CONCLUSION: HD cytarabine produces higher remission and survival rates than SD cytarabine, especially in patients younger than age 46 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24297940     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.8571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  56 in total

Review 1.  Molecular therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Catherine C Coombs; Martin S Tallman; Ross L Levine
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Progress in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Tapan M Kadia; Farhad Ravandi; Susan O'Brien; Jorge Cortes; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2014-09-19

3.  Toward Predicting Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patient Response to 7 + 3 Induction Chemotherapy via Diagnostic Microdosing.

Authors:  Tiffany M Scharadin; Michael A Malfatti; Kurt Haack; Kenneth W Turteltaub; Chong-Xian Pan; Paul T Henderson; Brian A Jonas
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Treatment, trial participation and survival in adult acute myeloid leukemia: a population-based study in the Netherlands, 1989-2012.

Authors:  A G Dinmohamed; O Visser; Y van Norden; N M A Blijlevens; J J Cornelissen; G A Huls; P C Huijgens; P Sonneveld; A A van de Loosdrecht; G J Ossenkoppele; B Löwenberg; M Jongen-Lavrencic
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 5.  Novel Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Are We Finally Breaking the Deadlock?

Authors:  Maximilian Stahl; Benjamin Y Lu; Tae Kon Kim; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.493

6.  Benefit of high-dose daunorubicin in AML induction extends across cytogenetic and molecular groups.

Authors:  Marlise R Luskin; Ju-Whei Lee; Hugo F Fernandez; Omar Abdel-Wahab; John M Bennett; Rhett P Ketterling; Hillard M Lazarus; Ross L Levine; Mark R Litzow; Elisabeth M Paietta; Jay P Patel; Janis Racevskis; Jacob M Rowe; Martin S Tallman; Zhuoxin Sun; Selina M Luger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Randomized trial comparing standard vs sequential high-dose chemotherapy for inducing early CR in adult AML.

Authors:  Renato Bassan; Tamara Intermesoli; Arianna Masciulli; Chiara Pavoni; Cristina Boschini; Giacomo Gianfaldoni; Filippo Marmont; Irene Cavattoni; Daniele Mattei; Elisabetta Terruzzi; Lorella De Paoli; Chiara Cattaneo; Erika Borlenghi; Fabio Ciceri; Massimo Bernardi; Anna M Scattolin; Elisabetta Todisco; Leonardo Campiotti; Paolo Corradini; Agostino Cortelezzi; Dario Ferrero; Pamela Zanghì; Elena Oldani; Orietta Spinelli; Ernesta Audisio; Sergio Cortelazzo; Alberto Bosi; Brunangelo Falini; Enrico M Pogliani; Alessandro Rambaldi
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-04-09

8.  Comparative value of post-remission treatment in cytogenetically normal AML subclassified by NPM1 and FLT3-ITD allelic ratio.

Authors:  J Versluis; F E M In 't Hout; R Devillier; W L J van Putten; M G Manz; M-C Vekemans; M-C Legdeur; J R Passweg; J Maertens; J Kuball; B J Biemond; P J M Valk; B A van der Reijden; G Meloni; H C Schouten; E Vellenga; T Pabst; R Willemze; B Löwenberg; G Ossenkoppele; F Baron; G Huls; J J Cornelissen
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 9.  Acute Myeloid Leukemia: How Do We Measure Success?

Authors:  Joshua P Sasine; Gary J Schiller
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 10.  Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel.

Authors:  Hartmut Döhner; Elihu Estey; David Grimwade; Sergio Amadori; Frederick R Appelbaum; Thomas Büchner; Hervé Dombret; Benjamin L Ebert; Pierre Fenaux; Richard A Larson; Ross L Levine; Francesco Lo-Coco; Tomoki Naoe; Dietger Niederwieser; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Miguel Sanz; Jorge Sierra; Martin S Tallman; Hwei-Fang Tien; Andrew H Wei; Bob Löwenberg; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.