Literature DB >> 31032192

Reproducibility and non-redundancy of radiomic features extracted from arterial phase CT scans in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: impact of tumor segmentation variability.

Qingtao Qiu1, Jinghao Duan1, Zuyun Duan2, Xiangjuan Meng3, Changsheng Ma1, Jian Zhu1, Jie Lu1, Tonghai Liu1, Yong Yin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reproducibility and non-redundancy of radiomic features are challenges in accelerating the clinical translation of radiomics. In this study, we focused on the robustness and non-redundancy of radiomic features extracted from computed tomography (CT) scans in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with respect to different tumor segmentation methods.
METHODS: Arterial enhanced CT images were retrospectively randomly obtained from 106 patients. As a training data set, 26 HCC patients were used to calculate the features' reproducibility and redundancy. Another data set (55 HCC patients and 25 healthy volunteers) was used for classification. The GrowCut and GraphCut semiautomatic segmentation methods were implemented in 3D Slicer software by two independent observers, and manual delineation was performed by five abdominal radiation oncologists to acquire the gross tumor volume (GTV). Seventy-one radiomic features were extracted from GTVs using Imaging Biomarker Explorer (IBEX) software, including 17 tumor intensity statistical features, 16 shape features and 38 textural features. For each radiomic feature, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and hierarchical clustering were used to quantify its reproducibility and redundancy. Features with ICC values greater than 0.75 were considered reproducible. To generate the number of non-redundancy feature subgroups, the R2 statistic method was used. Then, a classification model was built using a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm with 10-fold cross validation, and area under ROC curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the utility of non-redundant feature extraction by hierarchical clustering.
RESULTS: The percentages of excellent reproducible features in the manual delineation group, GraphCut and GrowCut segmentation group were 69% [49], 73% [52] and 79% [56], respectively. Sixty-five percent [46] of the features showed strong robustness for all segmentation methods. The optimal number of cluster subgroup were 9, 13 and 11 for manual delineation, GraphCut and GrowCut segmentation, respectively. The optimal cluster subgroup number was 6 for all groups when the collectively high reproducibility features were selected for clustering. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of radiomics classification model with and without feature reduction for healthy liver and HCC had an AUC value of 0.857 and 0.721 respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that variations exist in the reproducibility of quantitative imaging features extracted from tumor regions segmented using different methods. The reproducibility and non-redundancy of the radiomic features rely greatly on the tumor segmentation in HCC CT images. We recommend that the most reliable and uniform radiomic features should be selected in the clinical use of radiomics. Classification experiments with feature reduction showed that radiomic features were effective in identifying healthy liver and HCC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); non-redundancy; radiomics; reproducibility; semiautomatic segmentation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31032192      PMCID: PMC6462568          DOI: 10.21037/qims.2019.03.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  36 in total

1.  Fast optimal leaf ordering for hierarchical clustering.

Authors:  Z Bar-Joseph; D K Gifford; T S Jaakkola
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Intratumor heterogeneity in human glioblastoma reflects cancer evolutionary dynamics.

Authors:  Andrea Sottoriva; Inmaculada Spiteri; Sara G M Piccirillo; Anestis Touloumis; V Peter Collins; John C Marioni; Christina Curtis; Colin Watts; Simon Tavaré
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Lambin; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Ralph Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Patrick Granton; Catharina M L Zegers; Robert Gillies; Ronald Boellard; André Dekker; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  High quality machine-robust image features: identification in nonsmall cell lung cancer computed tomography images.

Authors:  Luke A Hunter; Shane Krafft; Francesco Stingo; Haesun Choi; Mary K Martel; Stephen F Kry; Laurence E Court
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: an integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability.

Authors:  Ralph T H Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Wouter J C van Elmpt; Chintan Parmar; Otto S Hoekstra; Corneline J Hoekstra; Ronald Boellaard; André L A J Dekker; Robert J Gillies; Hugo J W L Aerts; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.089

6.  A semiautomatic CT-based ensemble segmentation of lung tumors: comparison with oncologists' delineations and with the surgical specimen.

Authors:  Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Hugo J W L Aerts; Yuhua Gu; Dmitry B Goldgof; Dirk De Ruysscher; Andre Dekker; René Korn; Robert J Gillies; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Are pretreatment 18F-FDG PET tumor textural features in non-small cell lung cancer associated with response and survival after chemoradiotherapy?

Authors:  Gary J R Cook; Connie Yip; Muhammad Siddique; Vicky Goh; Sugama Chicklore; Arunabha Roy; Paul Marsden; Shahreen Ahmad; David Landau
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Decoding global gene expression programs in liver cancer by noninvasive imaging.

Authors:  Eran Segal; Claude B Sirlin; Clara Ooi; Adam S Adler; Jeremy Gollub; Xin Chen; Bryan K Chan; George R Matcuk; Christopher T Barry; Howard Y Chang; Michael D Kuo
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 9.  Functional imaging of cancer with emphasis on molecular techniques.

Authors:  Drew A Torigian; Steve S Huang; Mohamed Houseni; Abass Alavi
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 10.  Imaging and cancer: a review.

Authors:  Leonard Fass
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 7.449

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  How to read and review papers on machine learning and artificial intelligence in radiology: a survival guide to key methodological concepts.

Authors:  Burak Kocak; Ece Ates Kus; Ozgur Kilickesmez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Radiomics of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Sara Lewis; Stefanie Hectors; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-01

Review 3.  Review of Radiomics- and Dosiomics-based Predicting Models for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yun Qin; Li-Hua Zhu; Wei Zhao; Jun-Jie Wang; Hao Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 4.  Radiomics: a primer on high-throughput image phenotyping.

Authors:  Kyle J Lafata; Yuqi Wang; Brandon Konkel; Fang-Fang Yin; Mustafa R Bashir
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-08-25

5.  Reproducibility of CT-based radiomic features against image resampling and perturbations for tumour and healthy kidney in renal cancer patients.

Authors:  Margherita Mottola; Alessandro Bevilacqua; Stephan Ursprung; Leonardo Rundo; Lorena Escudero Sanchez; Tobias Klatte; Iosif Mendichovszky; Grant D Stewart; Evis Sala
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Quantitative assessment of acquisition imaging parameters on MRI radiomics features: a prospective anthropomorphic phantom study using a 3D-T2W-TSE sequence for MR-guided-radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jing Yuan; Cindy Xue; Gladys Lo; Oi Lei Wong; Yihang Zhou; Siu Ki Yu; Kin Yin Cheung
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-05

7.  Radiomics feature reproducibility under inter-rater variability in segmentations of CT images.

Authors:  Christoph Haarburger; Gustav Müller-Franzes; Leon Weninger; Christiane Kuhl; Daniel Truhn; Dorit Merhof
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Contrast-Enhanced CT-Based Radiomics Analysis in Predicting Lymphovascular Invasion in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yang Li; Meng Yu; Guangda Wang; Li Yang; Chongfei Ma; Mingbo Wang; Meng Yue; Mengdi Cong; Jialiang Ren; Gaofeng Shi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Radiomics side experiments and DAFIT approach in identifying pulmonary hypertension using Cardiac MRI derived radiomics based machine learning models.

Authors:  Sarv Priya; Tanya Aggarwal; Caitlin Ward; Girish Bathla; Mathews Jacob; Alicia Gerke; Eric A Hoffman; Prashant Nagpal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Segmentation of MRI head anatomy using deep volumetric networks and multiple spatial priors.

Authors:  Lukas Hirsch; Yu Huang; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.