Lukas Hirsch1, Yu Huang2, Lucas C Parra1. 1. City College New York, Department of Biomedical Engineering, New York City, New York, United States. 2. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, New York City, New York, United States.
Abstract
Purpose: Conventional automated segmentation of the head anatomy in magnetic resonance images distinguishes different brain and nonbrain tissues based on image intensities and prior tissue probability maps (TPMs). This works well for normal head anatomies but fails in the presence of unexpected lesions. Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) leverage instead spatial patterns and can learn to segment lesions but often ignore prior probabilities. Approach: We add three sources of prior information to a three-dimensional (3D) convolutional network, namely, spatial priors with a TPM, morphological priors with conditional random fields, and spatial context with a wider field-of-view at lower resolution. We train and test these networks on 3D images of 43 stroke patients and 4 healthy individuals which have been manually segmented. Results: We demonstrate the benefits of each source of prior information, and we show that the new architecture, which we call Multiprior network, improves the performance of existing segmentation software, such as SPM, FSL, and DeepMedic for abnormal anatomies. The relevance of the different priors was compared, and the TPM was found to be most beneficial. The benefit of adding a TPM is generic in that it can boost the performance of established segmentation networks such as the DeepMedic and a UNet. We also provide an out-of-sample validation and clinical application of the approach on an additional 47 patients with disorders of consciousness. We make the code and trained networks freely available. Conclusions: Biomedical images follow imaging protocols that can be leveraged as prior information into deep CNNs to improve performance. The network segmentations match human manual corrections performed in 3D and are comparable in performance to human segmentations obtained from scratch in 2D for abnormal brain anatomies.
Purpose: Conventional automated segmentation of the head anatomy in magnetic resonance images distinguishes different brain and nonbrain tissues based on image intensities and prior tissue probability maps (TPMs). This works well for normal head anatomies but fails in the presence of unexpected lesions. Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) leverage instead spatial patterns and can learn to segment lesions but often ignore prior probabilities. Approach: We add three sources of prior information to a three-dimensional (3D) convolutional network, namely, spatial priors with a TPM, morphological priors with conditional random fields, and spatial context with a wider field-of-view at lower resolution. We train and test these networks on 3D images of 43 stroke patients and 4 healthy individuals which have been manually segmented. Results: We demonstrate the benefits of each source of prior information, and we show that the new architecture, which we call Multiprior network, improves the performance of existing segmentation software, such as SPM, FSL, and DeepMedic for abnormal anatomies. The relevance of the different priors was compared, and the TPM was found to be most beneficial. The benefit of adding a TPM is generic in that it can boost the performance of established segmentation networks such as the DeepMedic and a UNet. We also provide an out-of-sample validation and clinical application of the approach on an additional 47 patients with disorders of consciousness. We make the code and trained networks freely available. Conclusions: Biomedical images follow imaging protocols that can be leveraged as prior information into deep CNNs to improve performance. The network segmentations match human manual corrections performed in 3D and are comparable in performance to human segmentations obtained from scratch in 2D for abnormal brain anatomies.
Authors: Muhammad Febrian Rachmadi; Maria Del C Valdés-Hernández; Maria Leonora Fatimah Agan; Carol Di Perri; Taku Komura Journal: Comput Med Imaging Graph Date: 2018-02-17 Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: Yu Huang; Jacek P Dmochowski; Yuzhuo Su; Abhishek Datta; Christopher Rorden; Lucas C Parra Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2013-10-08 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Jacek P Dmochowski; Abhishek Datta; Yu Huang; Jessica D Richardson; Marom Bikson; Julius Fridriksson; Lucas C Parra Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Konstantinos Kamnitsas; Christian Ledig; Virginia F J Newcombe; Joanna P Simpson; Andrew D Kane; David K Menon; Daniel Rueckert; Ben Glocker Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2016-10-29 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Christine Egger; Roland Opfer; Chenyu Wang; Timo Kepp; Maria Pia Sormani; Lothar Spies; Michael Barnett; Sven Schippling Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2016-11-20 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Yu Huang; Raquel Moreno; Rachna Malani; Alicia Meng; Nathaniel Swinburne; Andrei I Holodny; Ye Choi; Henry Rusinek; James B Golomb; Ajax George; Lucas C Parra; Robert J Young Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 4.903