Literature DB >> 34878949

Attentional Guidance and Match Decisions Rely on Different Template Information During Visual Search.

Xinger Yu1,2, Timothy D Hanks3,4, Joy J Geng1,2.   

Abstract

When searching for a target object, we engage in a continuous "look-identify" cycle in which we use known features of the target to guide attention toward potential targets and then to decide whether the selected object is indeed the target. Target information in memory (the target template or attentional template) is typically characterized as having a single, fixed source. However, debate has recently emerged over whether flexibility in the target template is relational or optimal. On the basis of evidence from two experiments using college students (Ns = 30 and 70, respectively), we propose that initial guidance of attention uses a coarse relational code, but subsequent decisions use an optimal code. Our results offer a novel perspective that the precision of template information differs when guiding sensory selection and when making identity decisions during visual search.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; drift-diffusion model; open data; target template; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34878949      PMCID: PMC8822198          DOI: 10.1177/09567976211032225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  47 in total

1.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex.

Authors:  S Treue; J C Martínez Trujillo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Color coding in a visual search task.

Authors:  B F GREEN; L K ANDERSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-01

3.  Inhibitory tagging in visual search: only in difficult search are items tagged individually.

Authors:  Johan Hulleman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Combining top-down processes to guide eye movements during real-world scene search.

Authors:  George L Malcolm; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Automatic guidance of attention from working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; John Hodsoll; Pia Rotshtein; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Search goal tunes visual features optimally.

Authors:  Vidhya Navalpakkam; Laurent Itti
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Searching for something familiar or novel: top-down attentional selection of specific items or object categories.

Authors:  Rachel Wu; Gaia Scerif; Richard N Aslin; Tim J Smith; Rebecca Nako; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Individual Differences and Fitting Methods for the Two-Choice Diffusion Model of Decision Making.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Russ Childers
Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )       Date:  2015

10.  Goal-dependent dissociation of visual and prefrontal cortices during working memory.

Authors:  Sue-Hyun Lee; Dwight J Kravitz; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  2 in total

1.  Benefits from negative templates in easy and difficult search depend on rapid distractor rejection and enhanced guidance.

Authors:  Ziyao Zhang; Renee Sahatdjian; Nancy B Carlisle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 1.984

2.  Visual search guidance uses coarser template information than target-match decisions.

Authors:  Xinger Yu; Simran K Johal; Joy J Geng
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.157

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.