Literature DB >> 24666133

Effects of search difficulty on the selection, maintenance, and learning of attentional templates.

Eren Gunseli1, Christian N L Olivers, Martijn Meeter.   

Abstract

Prominent theories of attention claim that visual search is guided through attentional templates stored in working memory. Recently, the contralateral delay activity (CDA), an electrophysiological index of working memory storage, has been found to rapidly decrease when participants repeatedly search for the same target, suggesting that, with learning, the template moves out of working memory. However, this has only been investigated with pop-out search for distinct targets, for which a strong attentional template may not be necessary. More effortful search tasks might rely more on an active attentional template in working memory, leading to a slower handoff to long-term memory and thus a slower decline of the CDA. Using ERPs, we compared the rate of learning of attentional templates in pop-out and effortful search tasks. In two experiments, the rate of decrease in the CDA was the same for both search tasks. Similar results were found for a second component indexing working memory effort, the late positive complex. However, the late positive complex was also sensitive to anticipated search difficulty, as was expressed in a greater amplitude before the harder search task. We conclude that the amount of working memory effort invested in maintaining an attentional template, but not the rate of learning, depends on search difficulty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24666133     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  13 in total

Review 1.  Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Phillip Witkowski
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-01-11

2.  Preparation for upcoming attentional states in the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Eren Günseli; Mariam Aly
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Are all real-world objects created equal? Estimating the "set-size" of the search target in visual working memory.

Authors:  Michael T Miuccio; Gregory J Zelinsky; Joseph Schmidt
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-06-27

Review 5.  The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory.

Authors:  Roy Luria; Halely Balaban; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Visual working memory gives up attentional control early in learning: ruling out interhemispheric cancellation.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  What not to look for: Electrophysiological evidence that searchers prefer positive templates.

Authors:  Jason Rajsic; Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.054

Review 8.  'Activity-silent' working memory in prefrontal cortex: a dynamic coding framework.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Learning changes the attentional status of prospective memories.

Authors:  Dirk van Moorselaar; Jan Theeuwes; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

10.  Neural Processing of Repeated Search Targets Depends Upon the Stimuli: Real World Stimuli Engage Semantic Processing and Recognition Memory.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Lauren H Williams; Christopher Michael Jones; Roy Luria
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.