Literature DB >> 28240928

Adding details to the attentional template offsets search difficulty: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Joseph Schmidt1, Gregory J Zelinsky2.   

Abstract

We investigated how expected search difficultly affects the attentional template by having participants search for a teddy bear target among either other teddy bears (difficult search, high target-distractor similarity) or random nonbear objects (easy search, low target-distractor similarity). Target previews were identical in these 2 blocked conditions, and target-related visual working memory (VWM) load was measured using contralateral delay activity (CDA), an event-related potential indicating VWM load. CDA was assessed after target designation but before search display onset. Shortly after preview offset, the expectation of a difficult search produced a target-related CDA, suggesting the encoding and maintenance of target details in VWM. However, no differences in CDA were found immediately before search onset, suggesting a flexible and efficient weighting of the templates' features to reflect the expected demands of the search task. Moreover, CDA amplitude correlated with eye movement measures of search guidance in difficult search trials but not easy trials, suggesting that the utility of the attentional template is greater for more difficult searches. These findings are evidence that attentional templates depend on expected task difficulty, and that people may compensate for a more difficult search by adding details to their target representation in VWM, as measured by CDA. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28240928     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

Review 1.  Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Phillip Witkowski
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-01-11

2.  Incidental memory following rapid object processing: The role of attention allocation strategies.

Authors:  Juan D Guevara Pinto; Megan H Papesh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Are all real-world objects created equal? Estimating the "set-size" of the search target in visual working memory.

Authors:  Michael T Miuccio; Gregory J Zelinsky; Joseph Schmidt
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Visual working memory and action: Functional links and bi-directional influences.

Authors:  Freek van Ede
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-05-12

5.  Target templates in low target-distractor discriminability visual search have higher resolution, but the advantage they provide is short-lived.

Authors:  Jonas Sin-Heng Lau; Hal Pashler; Timothy F Brady
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Allocation of resources in working memory: Theoretical and empirical implications for visual search.

Authors:  Stanislas Huynh Cong; Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.