Literature DB >> 35545435

Tracking neural markers of template formation and implementation in attentional inhibition under different distractor consistency.

Wen Wen 雯文1, Zhibang Huang 邦黄志1, Yin Hou 寅侯1, Sheng Li 晟李2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

Performing visual search tasks requires optimal attention deployment to promote targets and inhibit distractors. Rejection templates based on the distractor's feature can be built to constrain the search process. We measured electroencephalography (EEG) of human participants of both sexes when they performed a visual search task in conditions where the distractor cues were constant within a block (fixed-cueing) or changed on a trial-by-trial basis (varied-cueing). In the fixed-cueing condition, sustained decoding of the cued colors could be achieved during the retention interval and the participants with higher decoding accuracy showed larger suppression benefits of the distractor cueing in the search period. In the varied-cueing condition, the cued color could only be transiently decoded after its onset and the higher decoding accuracy was observed from the participants who demonstrated lower suppression benefit. The differential neural representations of the to-be-ignored color in the two cueing conditions as well as their reverse associations with behavioral performance implied that rejection templates were formed in the fixed-cueing condition but not in the varied-cueing condition. Additionally, we observed stronger posterior alpha lateralization and mid-frontal theta/beta power during the retention interval of the varied-cueing condition, indicating the cognitive costs in template formation caused by the trialwise change of distractor colors. Taken together, our findings revealed the neural markers associated with the critical roles of distractor consistency in linking template formation to successful inhibition.Significance StatementHow do we strategically build a rejection template based on distractor features to filter out matched items when performing visual search tasks? Previous studies have suggested that the consistency of the to-be-ignored feature may play a significant role in this process. We recorded scalp EEG when human participants searched for a target among distractors. Capitalized on multivariate decoding technique and time-frequency analysis, we revealed the neural markers of the rejection template under different distractor consistencies. Being able to track these processes in visual search could help us to understand the connection between template formation and successful distractor inhibition. Our findings may also benefit future EEG-based interventions on individuals with deficits in attentional control.
Copyright © 2022 the authors.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35545435      PMCID: PMC9188384          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1705-21.2022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  53 in total

1.  The ignoring paradox: cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Gaze dynamics of feature-based distractor inhibition under prior-knowledge and expectations.

Authors:  Wen Wen; Yangming Zhang; Sheng Li
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Association between cue lead time and template-for-rejection effect.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Tanda; Jun I Kawahara
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Causal Evidence for a Role of Theta and Alpha Oscillations in the Control of Working Memory.

Authors:  Justin Riddle; Jason M Scimeca; Dillan Cellier; Sofia Dhanani; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.

Authors:  Benchi Wang; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Whatever you do, don't look at the...: Evaluating guidance by an exclusionary attentional template.

Authors:  Valerie M Beck; Steven J Luck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Distractor ignoring: strategies, learning, and passive filtering.

Authors:  Joy Geng; Bo-Yeong Won; Nancy Carlisle
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-09-16

8.  Is a search template an ordinary working memory? Comparing electrophysiological markers of working memory maintenance for visual search and recognition.

Authors:  Eren Gunseli; Martijn Meeter; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Cognitive control over working memory biases of selection.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner; David Soto
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

Review 10.  Flexibility in Attentional Control: Multiple Sources and Suppression.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2019-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.