| Literature DB >> 30717803 |
Yuqi Yang1, Yixin Zhang1, Jiarui Li1, Ping Cheng1, Tianshi Xiao1, Ishfaq Muhammad1, Hongxiao Yu1, Ruimeng Liu1, Xiuying Zhang2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Improper use of antimicrobials results in poor treatment and severe bacterial resistance. Breakpoints are routinely used in the clinical laboratory setting to guide clinical decision making. Therefore, the objective of this study was to establish antimicrobial susceptibility breakpoints for danofloxacin against Escherichia coli (E.coli), which is an important pathogen of digestive tract infections.Entities:
Keywords: COPD; Danofloxacin; ECV; Escherichia coli; Monte Carlo simulation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30717803 PMCID: PMC6360659 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-1783-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1Primary MIC distribution of danofloxacin against 1233 E.coli isolates
Optimum non-linear least squares regression fitting of pooled MICs (mg/mL) for danafloxacin and E.coli
| Subset | Number of isolates | Mean MIC (log2) | Standard deviation (log2) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fitted | TRUE | Est. | Diff. | ASE | Est./ASE | 95%CIb | Est. | ASE | Est./ASE | 95%CIa | Est. | ASE | Est./ASE | 95%CIb |
| ≤128 | 1233.00 | 1417.00 | 184.00 | 106.60 | 13.29 | 1185 to 1650 | 2.22 | 0.54 | 4.12 | 1.046 to 3.394 | 4.63 | 0.42 | 11.01 | 3.711 to 5.544 |
| ≤64 | 1118.00 | 1293.00 | 175.00 | 108.50 | 11.92 | 1054 to 1532 | 1.64 | 0.55 | 2.95 | 0.4138 to 2.856 | 4.27 | 0.43 | 9.90 | 3.324 to 5.224 |
| ≤32 | 1010.00 | 1174.00 | 164.00 | 114.30 | 10.27 | 919.5 to 1429 | 1.07 | 0.59 | 1.81 | −0.2443 to 2.385 | 3.93 | 0.46 | 8.64 | 2.918 to 4.947 |
| ≤16 | 916.00 | 1040.00 | 124.00 | 113.90 | 9.13 | 782.2 to 1298 | 0.42 | 0.60 | 0.70 | −0.9379 to 1.780 | 3.53 | 0.47 | 7.53 | 2.471 to 4.594 |
| ≤8b | 756.00 | 829.80 | 73.80 | 63.56 | 13.06 | 683.2 to 976.3 | −0.63 | 0.36 | −1.75 | −1.469 to 0.2008 | 2.81 | 0.33 | 8.54 | 2.051 to 3.569 |
| ≤4 | 663.00 | 786.90 | 123.90 | 93.92 | 8.38 | 564.8 to 1009 | −0.85 | 0.51 | −1.68 | −2.041 to 0.3476 | 2.66 | 0.41 | 6.43 | 1.679 to 3.634 |
| ≤2 | 596.00 | 980.00 | 384.00 | 353.30 | 2.77 | 115.5 to 1844 | −0.01 | 1.47 | −0.01 | −3.611 to 3.590 | 3.12 | 0.79 | 3.95 | 1.184 to 5.052 |
Est., non linear regression estimate of value; Diff., estimate of N minus true N; ASE, asymptotic standard error; Est./ASE, estimate divided by asymptotic standard error
a95% CI of estimate of value
bThis subset gave the smallest difference between the estimate and true number of isolates in the subset
Fig. 2Iterative non-linear regression curve fitting with increasing subsets. X axis = Log2 MIC, Y axis = numbers of isolates. Numbers below each graph are the values for the true number of isolates included in the dataset (True n), the non-linear regression estimate (Estimated n) and the difference between these two values of n (Difference). O = observed numbers; solid line = fitted curve
Fig. 3The in vitro time killing curve of danofloxacin against E.coli
Fig. 4Concentration-time plot of plasma danofloxacin data at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after i.m. administration at a dose rate of 2.5 mg/kg in pigs. Values are means±SD (n = 6)
PK parameters for danofloxacin in pig plasma after i.m. administration at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg (n = 6)
| PK parameter | Unit | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|---|
| A | μg/mL | 2.09 ± 1.46 |
| B | μg/mL | 0.41 ± 0.17 |
| α | 1/h | 0.81 ± 0.41 |
| β | 1/h | 0.10 ± 0.02 |
| Ka | 1/h | 2.00 ± 0.51 |
| K10 | 1/h | 0.25 ± 0.08 |
| K12 | 1/h | 0.32 ± 0.20 |
| K21 | 1/h | 0.34 ± 0.23 |
| T1/2Ka | h | 0.37 ± 0.09 |
| T1/2α | h | 1.07 ± 0.60 |
| T1/2β | h | 7.28 ± 1.10 |
| AUC | h*μg/mL | 5.25 ± 1.35 |
| Tmax | h | 0.97 ± 0.08 |
| Cmax | μg/mL | 0.76 ± 0.08 |
| CL | L/h | 7.75 ± 1.74 |
| Vc | liter/kg | 2.28 ± 0.39 |
| Vp | liter/kg | 2.16 ± 0.86 |
| Vss | liter/kg | 4.17 ± 0.76 |
A and B: Y-axis intercept terms; α: distribution rate constant; β: elimination rate constant; Ka: absorption rate constant; K10: central compartment elimination rate constant; K12: rate constant from central to peripheral compartment; K21: rate constant from peripheral to central compartment; T1/2Ka: absorption half-life of the drug; T1/2α: distribution half-life of the drug; T1/2β: elimination half-life of the drug; AUC: area under the curve of plasma concentration-time; Tmax: the time point of maximum plasma concentration of the drug; Cmax: the maximum plasma concentration; CL: body clearance; Vc: volume of distribution in the central compartment; Vp: volume of distribution; Vss: volume of distribution at steady state
Fig. 5Results of a 10,000-iteration Monte Carlo simulation for danofloxacin based on MIC and AUC0–24. The red bars represent the number of simulated with AUC: MIC ratios < 125, whereas the gray bars represent with AUC: MIC ratios of ≥ 125. The probability of danofloxacin attaining an AUC: MIC ratio of at least 125 is 92.25%. Therefore, the COPD was defined as 0.03 μg/mL