Literature DB >> 11755438

Pharmacodynamic profiling of levofloxacin and gatifloxacin using Monte Carlo simulation for community-acquired isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

D P Nicolau1, P G Ambrose.   

Abstract

In vitro and in vivo models of infection suggest that the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC): minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio is the pharmacodynamic parameter that is most predictive of bactericidal activity for the fluoroquinolones. Additionally, this parameter has also been correlated with clinical outcomes in humans with respiratory tract infection. Despite these defined relationships, broad-scale application of these principles in the section of optimal therapy in the clinical arena has been restricted by the imprecise estimates of drug exposures (ie, AUC:MIC ratio) in the infected population. In an effort to best describe the known variability in the pharmacokinetic and susceptibility profile of agents of interest, Monte Carlo simulation has been employed to assess the probability of attaining the desired AUC:MIC ratio. In this report Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate the probability of attaining various target AUC:MIC ratios using AUC values from patients treated with either gatifloxacin or levofloxacin and the in vitro potency of the compounds as assessed in 881 clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from outpatients. Using a simulated patient population of 5,000, the median AUC:MIC ratios were 144 and 50 for gatifloxacin and levofloxacin, respectively. The probability of attaining AUC:MIC ratios of 30, 40, 65, 100, and 125 for gatifloxacin were 99%, 95%, 85%, 68%, and 60%, respectively. For levofloxacin, similar dynamic hit rates were 82%, 61%, 35%, 17%, and 12% over the range of target values. Regardless of the optimal ratio selected, gatifloxacin had a higher probability of achieving the AUC:MIC target than did levofloxacin. Simulations of this type can assist in the decision process surrounding the choice of optimal therapies based on our current understanding of antimicrobial pharmacodynamic principles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11755438     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)01026-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  8 in total

1.  Use of Monte Carlo simulations to select therapeutic doses and provisional breakpoints of BAL9141.

Authors:  Johan W Mouton; Anne Schmitt-Hoffmann; Stuart Shapiro; Norman Nashed; Nieko C Punt
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  New formulations of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid: a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic review.

Authors:  Amparo Sánchez Navarro
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Gatifloxacin: a review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections in the US.

Authors:  Susan J Keam; Katherine F Croom; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Antimicrobial treatment guidelines for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Jack B Anon; Michael R Jacobs; Michael D Poole; Paul G Ambrose; Mark S Benninger; James A Hadley; William A Craig
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  The influence of comorbidity on the effect of levofloxacin treatment success of ambulatory respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  Heinz Burgmann; Bernd Mayer; Arno Lukas; Friedrich Kumbein; Rainer Oberbauer
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2003

6.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin in intensive care patients.

Authors:  Amparo Sánchez Navarro; Clara-Isabel Colino Gandarillas; Francisco Alvarez Lerma; Y Alcalde Menacho; Alfonso Domínguez-Gil
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.577

7.  Pharmacodynamic evaluation of commonly prescribed oral antibiotics against respiratory bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Carlos Rv Kiffer; Antonio Cc Pignatari
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Susceptibility breakpoint for Danofloxacin against swine Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Yuqi Yang; Yixin Zhang; Jiarui Li; Ping Cheng; Tianshi Xiao; Ishfaq Muhammad; Hongxiao Yu; Ruimeng Liu; Xiuying Zhang
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.741

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.