| Literature DB >> 35163350 |
Xinyu Dai1,2, Yufeng Gu1,2, Jinli Guo1,2, Lingli Huang1,2, Guyue Cheng1,2, Dapeng Peng1,2, Haihong Hao1,2.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to establish the clinical breakpoint (CBP) of apramycin (APR) against Salmonella in swine and evaluate its effect on intestinal microbiota. The CBP was established based on three cutoff values of wild-type cutoff value (COWT), pharmacokinetic-pharmadynamic (PK/PD) cutoff value (COPD) and clinical cutoff value (COCL). The effect of the optimized dose regimen based on ex vivo PK/PD study. The evolution of the ileum flora was determined by the 16rRNA gene sequencing and bioinformatics. This study firstly established the COWT, COPD in ileum, and COCL of APR against swine Salmonella, the value of these cutoffs were 32 µg/mL, 32 µg/mL and 8 µg/mL, respectively. According to the guiding principle of the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), the final CBP in ileum was 32 µg/mL. Our results revealed the main evolution route in the composition of ileum microbiota of diarrheic piglets treated by APR. The change of the abundances of Bacteroidetes and Euryarchaeota was the most obvious during the evolution process. Methanobrevibacter, Prevotella, S24-7 and Ruminococcaceae were obtained as the highest abundance genus. The abundance of Methanobrevibacter increased significantly when APR treatment carried and decreased in cure and withdrawal period groups. The abundance of Prevotella in the tested groups was significantly lower than that in the healthy group. A decreased of abundance in S24-7 was observed after Salmonella infection and increased slightly after cure. Ruminococcaceae increased significantly after Salmonella infection and decreased significantly after APR treatment. In addition, the genera of Methanobrevibacter and Prevotella were defined as the key node. Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis, D-Glutamine and D-glutamate metabolism, D-Alanine metabolism, Peptidoglycan and amino acids biosynthesis were the top five Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways in the ileum microbiota of piglets during the Salmonella infection and APR treatment process. Our study extended the understanding of dynamic shift of gut microbes during diarrheic piglets treated by APR.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene sequencing; PK/PD cutoff value; Salmonella; apramycin; clinical breakpoint; clinical cutoff value; wild-type cutoff value
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35163350 PMCID: PMC8835974 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031424
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Nonlinear regression of MIC distribution for APR against swine Salmonella.
Figure 2The time–killing curve of APR against swine Salmonella in vitro and ex vivo. (A) The time-killing curve in MH broth; (B) the time–killing curve in ileum fluid of health piglets; (C) the time–killing curve in ileum fluid of diarrhea piglets.
Figure 3Concentration–time curve of APR in plasma and ileum content of piglets.
Integrated PK parameters for APR in plasma and ileum contents after oral administration of 30 mg/kg b.w.
| Parameter | Units | Plasma | Ileum Contents | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Group | Infected Group | Healthy Group | Infected Group | ||
| Cmax | μg/mL | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 863.4 ± 18.2 | 750.5 ± 24.82 |
| AUC0–24h | h·μg/mL | 4.12 ± 0.76 | 3.41 ± 0.48 | 3287.25 ± 23.41 | 2855.83 ± 19.81 |
| AUMC0–24h | h2·μg/mL | 63.68 ± 2.12 | 45.13 ± 1.71 | 19,965.83 ± 151.2 | 17,421.25 ± 132.5 |
| Tmax | H | 4.0 ± 0.0 | 4.0 ± 0.0 | 3.0 ± 0.0 | 3.0 ± 0.0 |
| T1/2 | H | 20.00 ± 1.02 | 15.77 ± 1.93 | 8.74 ± 1.01 | 7.83 ± 0.78 |
| MRT0–24h | H | 15.47 ± 0.92 | 13.22 ± 1.02 | 6.07 ± 0.24 | 6.10 ± 0.42 |
| CL/F | mL/h/kg | 5.69 ± 0.01 | 7.76 ± 0.02 | 9.0 ± 0.02 | 10.04 ± 0.01 |
Note: Cmax = maximum concentration, AUC0–24h = area under concentration curve, AUMC0–24h = first-order area under concentration curve, T1/2λ = elimination half-life, Tmax = time of maximum concentration, MRT0–24h = mean residence time, CL/F = body clearance scaled by bioavailability.
Ex vivo PK parameters of APR against swine Salmonella.
| Parameter | Unit | Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Group | Infected Group | ||
| Emax | Log10 CFU/mL | 4.25 | 3.48 |
| E0 | h | −5.69 | −5.33 |
| EC50 | Log10 CFU/mL | 47.16 | 49.37 |
| N | - | 27.25 | 6.10 |
| Emax-E0 | Log10 CFU/mL | 9.94 | 8.81 |
| AUC0–24h/MIC (E = 0) | h | 46.65 | 46 |
| AUC0–24h/MIC (E = −3) | h | 48.90 | 58.38 |
| AUC0–24h/MIC (E = −4) | h | 49.98 | 65.53 |
Figure 4The Venn diagram of the shared and unique OTUs presented in different groups. Note: “GY” represents the healthy group, “GY0” represents the infection group, “GY24” represents the treatment group, “GY72” represents the cure group and “GY96” represents the withdrawal period group.
Figure 5Alpha and beta diversity parameters presented in the five groups. (A) Alpha diversity parameters of richness, Shannon, Simpson, pielou, invsimpson, Chao1, ACE and good coverage; (B) Beta parameters of UPGMA, NMDS, ANOSIM and PCoA.
Figure 6Taxonomic classification of the 16S rRNA gene sequences at phylum and genus levels. (A) The evolution Flora presented at phylum level; (B) The bacterial community composition at genus level.
Figure 7Different structures of ileum microbiota presented in different groups by the LEfSe analysis. (A) Taxonomic biomarkers found among groups by LEfSe; (B) Cladogram plot of the biomarkers. The size of the node represents the abundance of the taxa. Only taxa with LDA scores (log 10) > 4 were shown.
Figure 8Co-occurrence network existed of ileum flora.
Figure 9Comparison of variations presented in abundance of known KEGG pathways.