Literature DB >> 12902290

Use of 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region PCR and repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR analyses of Escherichia coli isolates to identify nonpoint fecal sources.

Sylvie Seurinck1, Willy Verstraete, Steven D Siciliano.   

Abstract

Despite efforts to minimize fecal input into waterways, this kind of pollution continues to be a problem due to an inability to reliably identify nonpoint sources. Our objective was to find candidate source-specific Escherichia coli fingerprints as potential genotypic markers for raw sewage, horses, dogs, gulls, and cows. We evaluated 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region (ISR)-PCR and repetitive extragenic palindromic (rep)-PCR analyses of E. coli isolates as tools to identify nonpoint fecal sources. The BOXA1R primer was used for rep-PCR analysis. A total of 267 E. coli isolates from different fecal sources were typed with both techniques. E. coli was found to be highly diverse. Only two candidate source-specific E. coli fingerprints, one for cow and one for raw sewage, were identified out of 87 ISR fingerprints. Similarly, there was only one candidate source-specific E. coli fingerprint for horse out of 59 BOX fingerprints. Jackknife analysis resulted in an average rate of correct classification (ARCC) of 83% for BOX-PCR analysis and 67% for ISR-PCR analysis for the five source categories of this study. When nonhuman sources were pooled so that each isolate was classified as animal or human derived (raw sewage), ARCCs of 82% for BOX-PCR analysis and 72% for ISR-PCR analysis were obtained. Critical factors affecting the utility of these methods, namely sample size and fingerprint stability, were also assessed. Chao1 estimation showed that generally 32 isolates per fecal source individual were sufficient to characterize the richness of the E. coli population of that source. The results of a fingerprint stability experiment indicated that BOX and ISR fingerprints were stable in natural waters at 4, 12, and 28 degrees C for 150 days. In conclusion, 16S-23S rRNA ISR-PCR and rep-PCR analyses of E. coli isolates have the potential to identify nonpoint fecal sources. A fairly small number of isolates was needed to find candidate source-specific E. coli fingerprints that were stable under the simulated environmental conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12902290      PMCID: PMC169150          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4942-4950.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  36 in total

1.  Determining sources of fecal pollution in a rural Virginia watershed with antibiotic resistance patterns in fecal streptococci.

Authors:  C Hagedorn; S L Robinson; J R Filtz; S M Grubbs; T A Angier; R B Reneau
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals.

Authors:  J M Cornuet; S Piry; G Luikart; A Estoup; M Solignac
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Virioplankton: viruses in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  K E Wommack; R R Colwell
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Classification of antibiotic resistance patterns of indicator bacteria by discriminant analysis: use in predicting the source of fecal contamination in subtropical waters.

Authors:  V J Harwood; J Whitlock; V Withington
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Use of repetitive DNA sequences and the PCR To differentiate Escherichia coli isolates from human and animal sources.

Authors:  P E Dombek; L K Johnson; S T Zimmerley; M J Sadowsky
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Discriminant analysis of ribotype profiles of Escherichia coli for differentiating human and nonhuman sources of fecal pollution.

Authors:  S Parveen; K M Portier; K Robinson; L Edmiston; M L Tamplin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Genetic structure of natural populations of Escherichia coli in wild hosts on different continents.

Authors:  V Souza; M Rocha; A Valera; L E Eguiarte
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of human and nonhuman Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S Parveen; N C Hodge; R E Stall; S R Farrah; M L Tamplin
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 9.  Water quality laws and waterborne diseases: Cryptosporidium and other emerging pathogens.

Authors:  L O Gostin; Z Lazzarini; V S Neslund; M T Osterholm
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Occurrence of Salmonella spp in estuarine and coastal waters of Portugal.

Authors:  L P Catalao Dionisio; M Joao; V S Ferreiro; M L Fidalgo; M E García Rosado; J J Borrego
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.271

View more
  17 in total

1.  The theoretical basis of universal identification systems for bacteria and viruses.

Authors:  S Chumakov; C Belapurkar; C Putonti; T-B Li; B M Pettitt; G E Fox; R C Willson; Yu Fofanov
Journal:  J Biol Phys Chem       Date:  2005-12-01

Review 2.  Performance, design, and analysis in microbial source tracking studies.

Authors:  Donald M Stoeckel; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Class 1 and class 2 integrons and plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance in coliforms isolated from ten rivers in northern Turkey.

Authors:  Osman Birol Ozgumus; Cemal Sandalli; Ali Sevim; Elif Celik-Sevim; Nuket Sivri
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.422

4.  Diversity of culturable psychrophilic and psychrotrophic anaerobic bacteria isolated from beef abattoirs and their environments.

Authors:  G Moschonas; D J Bolton; D A McDowell; J J Sheridan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Characterization of Escherichia coli isolates from different fecal sources by means of classification tree analysis of fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles.

Authors:  Sylvie Seurinck; Ellen Deschepper; Bishaw Deboch; Willy Verstraete; Steven Siciliano
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Statistical analyses: possible reasons for unreliability of source tracking efforts.

Authors:  Clarivel Lasalde; Roberto Rodríguez; Gary A Toranzos
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Genetic diversity of Escherichia coli isolated from urban rivers and beach water.

Authors:  Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Sample size, library composition, and genotypic diversity among natural populations of Escherichia coli from different animals influence accuracy of determining sources of fecal pollution.

Authors:  LeeAnn K Johnson; Mary B Brown; Ethan A Carruthers; John A Ferguson; Priscilla E Dombek; Michael J Sadowsky
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Characterization of Exiguobacterium isolates from the Siberian permafrost. Description of Exiguobacterium sibiricum sp. nov.

Authors:  Debora Frigi Rodrigues; Johan Goris; Tatiana Vishnivetskaya; David Gilichinsky; Michael F Thomashow; James M Tiedje
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2006-02-18       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Temporal dynamics and impact of manure storage on antibiotic resistance patterns and population structure of Escherichia coli isolates from a commercial swine farm.

Authors:  Patrick Duriez; Edward Topp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.