| Literature DB >> 35187143 |
Yu-Feng Zhou1,2,3, Zhen Sun1,3, Rui-Ling Wang1,3, Jian-Guo Li1,3, Chao-Yan Niu1,3, Xian-An Li1,3, Yun-Yun Feng1,3, Jian Sun1,2,3, Ya-Hong Liu1,2,3, Xiao-Ping Liao1,2,3.
Abstract
Danofloxacin is a synthetic fluoroquinolone with broad-spectrum activity developed for use in veterinary medicine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets, PK/PD cutoff values and the optimum doses of danofloxacin against P. multocida and H. parasuis in piglets. Single dose serum pharmacokinetics was determined in piglets after intravenous and intramuscular administration of 2.5 mg/kg. Danofloxacin was well absorbed and fully bioavailable (95.2%) after intramuscular administration of 2.5 mg/kg. The epidemiological cutoff (ECOFF) values of danofloxacin from 931 P. multocida isolates and 263 H. parasuis isolates were 0.03 and 4 mg/L, respectively. Danofloxacin MICs determined in porcine serum were markedly lower than those measured in artificial broth, with a broth/serum ratio of 4.33 for H. parasuis. Compared to P. multocida, danofloxacin exhibited significantly longer post-antibiotic effects (3.18-6.60 h) and post-antibiotic sub-MIC effects (7.02-9.94 h) against H. parasuis. The mean area under the concentration-time curve/MIC (AUC24h/MIC) targets of danofloxacin in serum associated with the static and bactericidal effects were 32 and 49.8, respectively, for P. multocida, whereas they were 14.6 and 37.8, respectively, for H. parasuis. Danofloxacin AUC24h/MIC targets for the same endpoints for P. multocida were higher than those for H. parasuis. At the current dose of 2.5 mg/kg, the PK/PD cutoff (COPD) values of danofloxacin against P. multocida and H. parasuis were calculated to be 0.125 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively, based on Monte Carlo simulations. The predicted optimum doses of danofloxacin for a probability of target attainment (PTA) of > 90% to cover the overall MIC population distributions of P. multocida and H. parasuis in this study were 2.38 and 13.36 mg/kg, respectively. These PK/PD-based results have potential relevance for the clinical dose optimization and evaluation of susceptibility breakpoints for danofloxacin in the treatment of swine respiratory tract infections involving these pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: H. parasuis; P. multocida; PK/PD; cutoff; danofloxacin
Year: 2022 PMID: 35187143 PMCID: PMC8847440 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.811967
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
The PK parameters of danofloxacin in porcine serum following single dose intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) administrations at 2.5 mg/kg.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Ka | 1/h | 4.99 ± 5.08 | |
| Kel | 1/h | 0.21 ± 0.12 | |
| A | mg/L | 1.12 ± 0.68 | – |
| α | 1/h | 4.44 ± 2.24 | – |
| B | mg/L | 1.67 ± 0.89 | – |
| β | 1/h | 0.20 ± 0.05 | – |
| T1/2Kel | h | 4.18 ± 1.81 | |
| T1/2Ka | h | 0.29 ± 0.20 | |
| T1/2α | h | 0.25 ± 0.24 | – |
| T1/2β | h | 3.76 ± 1.00 | – |
| Vss | L/kg | 1.90 ± 1.22 | – |
| Cl | L/kg/h | 0.39 ± 0.27 | – |
| AUCinfinity | mg·h/L | 9.39 ± 5.79 | 8.17 ± 3.51 |
| Tmax | h | 1.04 ± 0.52 | |
| Cmax | mg/L | 1.19 ± 0.55 | |
| F | % | – | 95.2 ± 21.9 |
K.
Figure 1The log2-transformed MIC distribution of danofloxacin against swine-origin P. multocida (A) and H. parasuis (B). The MIC distribution of P. multocida isolates (n = 931) was created by merging data from our laboratory and some previous studies (10, 11). H. parasuis isolates (n = 263) and MIC data were obtained in our own laboratory from 2015 to 2020. The number of isolates and the observed frequency corresponding to each MIC value are shown along the y-axes. The lines represent predicted frequency based on the best fitting log2-normal distribution [log2 mean (−6.06) ± SD (0.27) for P. multocida and log2 mean (−2.21) ± SD (2.49) for H. parasuis, respectively].
Figure 2The postantibiotic effects (PAEs) and post-antibiotic sub-MIC effects (PA-SMEs) of danofloxacin. (A,B) The PAEs were measured after initial exposure to danofloxacin at 1 × and 4 × MICs against P. multocida (A; strain NM5-7) and H. parasuis (B; strain 4–10). The PA-SMEs were measured after initial exposure to danofloxacin at 4 × MICs. The color horizontal bars represent the time that required bacterial counts to increase by 1.0-log10cfu/mL after drug removal (PAE) or at the sub-MIC phase (PA-SME). (C) Comparison of danofloxacin PAE and PA-SME between P. multocida and H. parasuis. Two P. multocida isolates and three H. parasuis isolates were tested and included. Statistical significance was determined using the two-tailed unpaired Student t-test (P < 0.05).
Figure 3Danofloxacin pharmacokinetics in piglets. Serum concentrations of danofloxacin following single dose intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) administrations at 2.5 mg/kg in piglets (n = 12 per time point). Upper right panel shows details from 0 to 6 h. The lines drawn through the time points indicated the best-fitting lines based on the compartment models.
Figure 4Ex vivo activity and PK/PD relationships of danofloxacin. (A,B) Ex vivo time-kill curves of danofloxacin against P. multocida [(A) strain NM5-7; MICserum = 0.13 mg/L] and H. parasuis [(B) strain 4-10; MICserum = 0.06 mg/L] in serums of piglets receiving intramuscular injection of danofloxacin (2.5 mg/kg b.w.). Numerical values on right brackets represent the mean concentrations of danofloxacin in serums collected from different time points post-dosing. (C,D) Correlation plots between ex vivo activity and AUC24h/MIC of danofloxacin using the sigmoid Emax equation. The fitting curves represent predicted values (two P. multocida and three H. parasuis included), and the points represent values of individual serum samples collected from 0 to 48 h.
PK/PD targets of danofloxacin in serum (AUC24h/MIC) necessary to achieve the bacteriostasis, bactericidal, and eradication effects for the study organisms in piglets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||||
| NM5-7 | 0.125 | 2.95 | −4.29 | 38.9 | 3.13 | 0.93 | 33.1 | 58.7 | 86.8 |
| CVCC434 | 0.031 | 1.29 | −4.69 | 36.7 | 8.20 | 0.96 | 30.9 | 40.9 | 47.1 |
|
|
|
| – |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| 4–10 | 0.063 | 2.05 | −5.24 | 31.8 | 1.64 | 0.97 | 16.8 | 50.5 | 79.3 |
| 5–2 | 0.063 | 2.88 | −4.59 | 12.8 | 1.80 | 0.98 | 10.2 | 24.6 | 50.5 |
| LM15 | 0.031 | 1.91 | −4.83 | 25.4 | 2.31 | 0.97 | 16.8 | 38.4 | 58.9 |
|
|
|
| – |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The bacteriostasis, bactericidal and eradication effects were defined as the net static, 3-log.
Figure 5PK/PD cutoff values for danofloxacin against P. multocida and H. parasuis. (A,B) Probability of target attainment (PTA) for typical AUC24h/MIC targets (bacteriostatic, bactericidal and eradication effects) at each possible MIC when treated with danofloxacin at dose of 2.5 mg/kg against P. multocida (A) and H. parasuis (B) infections. Dotted lines denote the PTA of 90%.
Figure 6Comparison of population distributions of danofloxacin doses for P. multocida (A) and H. parasuis (B). The right triangle depicted the calculated target doses for a PTA of > 90% to cover the overall MIC population distributions in this study.