| Literature DB >> 27047487 |
Peng Zhang1, Haihong Hao2, Jun Li1, Ijaz Ahmad1, Guyue Cheng2, Dongmei Chen2, Yanfei Tao2, Lingli Huang2, Yulian Wang2, Menghong Dai2, Zhenli Liu3, Zonghui Yuan4.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to establish antimicrobial susceptibility breakpoints for tilmicosin against Haemophilus parasuis, which is an important pathogen of respiratory tract infections. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 103 H. parasuis isolates were determined by the agar dilution method. The wild type (WT) distribution and epidemiologic cutoff value (ECV) were evaluated by statistical analysis. The new bronchoaveolar lavage was used to establish intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic (PK) model in swine. The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of tilmicosin, both in pulmonary epithelial lining fluid (PELF) and in plasma, were determined using high performance liquid chromatography method and WinNonlin software. The pharmacodynamic cutoff (COPD) was calculated using Monte Carlo simulation. Our results showed that 100% of WT isolates were covered when the ECV was set at 16 μg/mL. The tilmicosin had concentration-dependent activity against H. parasuis. The PK data indicated that tilmicosin concentrations in PELF was rapidly increased to high levels at 4 h and kept stable until 48 h after drug administration, while the tilmicosin concentration in plasma reached maximum levels at 4 h and continued to decrease during 4-72 h. Using Monte Carlo simulation, COPD was defined as 1 μg/mL. Conclusively, the ECV and COPD of tilmicosin against H. parasuis were established for the first time based on the MIC distribution and PK-PD analysis in the target tissue, respectively. These values are of great importance for detection of tilmicosin-resistant H. parasuis and for effective treatment of clinical intrapulmonary infection caused by H. parasuis.Entities:
Keywords: H. parasuis; bronchoaveolar lavage; epidemiologic cutoff value; pharmacodynamic cutoff; tilmicosin
Year: 2016 PMID: 27047487 PMCID: PMC4802331 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00385
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Optimum non-linear least squares regression fitting of pooled MICs (μg/mL) for tilmicosin and Haemophilus parasuis.
| Subset fitted | Number of isolates | Mean MIC (log2) | Standard deviation (log2) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| True | Est. | Diff. | ASE | Est./ASE | 95% CIb | Est. | ASE | Est./ASE | 95% CIa | Est. | ASE | Est./ASE | 95% CIb | |
| ≦1 | 72 | 120 | 48 | 59.930 | 2.0 | -138, 378 | -0.443 | 1.182 | -0.3 | -5.530, 4.645 | 1.802 | 0.630 | 2.9 | -0.910, 4.514 |
| ≦2 | 88 | 102 | 14 | 10.180 | 10.0 | 69, 134 | -0.810 | 0.268 | -3.0 | -1.661, 0.042 | 1.615 | 0.236 | 6.8 | 0.864, 2.366 |
| ≦4 | 99 | 103 | 4 | 4.352 | 23.7 | 91, 116 | -0.765 | 0.134 | -5.7 | -1.136,-0.393 | 1.648 | 0.147 | 11.2 | 1.239, 2.057 |
| ≦8 | 102 | 103 | 1 | 2.334 | 44.1 | 92, 109 | -0.773 | 0.086 | -9.0 | -0.995,-0.551 | 1.640 | 0.107 | 15.3 | 1.364, 1.916 |
| ≦16b | 103 | 103 | 0 | 1.565 | 65.8 | 99, 107 | -0.774 | 0.068 | -11.4 | -0.940,-0.608 | 1.639 | 0.088 | 18.6 | 1.423, 1.855 |
Pharmacokinetic parameters in plasma and ELF after oral administration of tilmicosin at a single dose of 40 mg/kg.bw.
| Parameters | Mean ± SD values | |
|---|---|---|
| Plasma | ELF | |
| AUC24 (μg.h/mL) | 20.13 ± 5.26 | 74.41 ± 17.98 |
| Tmax (h) | 3.52 ± 0.34 | 40.80 ± 6.57 |
| Cmax (μg/mL) | 1.57 ± 0.46 | 5.36 ± 0.74 |
| A (μg/mL) | 2.67 ± 0.99 | |
| B (μg/mL) | 0.09 ± 0.01 | |
| α (L/h) | 0.11 ± 0.01 | |
| β (L/h) | 0.002 ± 0.001 | |
| MRT (h) | 16.45 ± 1.67 | 37.64 ± 1.86 |
The AUC/MIC value calculated by Monte Carlo simulation and the accumulated probability of target attainment (PTA) of the target AUC/MIC (≥30) at specific MIC breakpoints.
| AUC24 (μg.h/mL) | MIC (μg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | |
| 47 | 94 | 47 | 24 | 12 | 6 |
| 94 | 188 | 94 | 47 | 24 | 12 |
| 69 | 138 | 69 | 35 | 17 | 9 |
| 76 | 152 | 76 | 38 | 19 | 10 |
| 63 | 126 | 63 | 32 | 16 | 8 |
| 87 | 174 | 87 | 44 | 22 | 11 |
| … | … | … | … | … | … |
| PTA (%) | 100 | 100 | 76 | 1 | 0 |