Donghwi Hwang1,2, Seung Kwan Kang1,2, Kyeong Yun Kim1,2, Seongho Seo3, Jin Chul Paeng2,4, Dong Soo Lee5,4,6, Jae Sung Lee7,2,4. 1. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. 3. Department of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, Gachon University, Incheon, Korea jaes@snu.ac.kr. 4. Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea; and. 5. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea jaes@snu.ac.kr. 6. Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Suwon, Korea. 7. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea jaes@snu.ac.kr.
Abstract
We propose a new deep learning-based approach to provide more accurate whole-body PET/MRI attenuation correction than is possible with the Dixon-based 4-segment method. We use activity and attenuation maps estimated using the maximum-likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation (MLAA) algorithm as inputs to a convolutional neural network (CNN) to learn a CT-derived attenuation map. Methods: The whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT scan data of 100 cancer patients (38 men and 62 women; age, 57.3 ± 14.1 y) were retrospectively used for training and testing the CNN. A modified U-net was trained to predict a CT-derived μ-map (μ-CT) from the MLAA-generated activity distribution (λ-MLAA) and μ-map (μ-MLAA). We used 1.3 million patches derived from 60 patients' data for training the CNN, data of 20 others were used as a validation set to prevent overfitting, and the data of the other 20 were used as a test set for the CNN performance analysis. The attenuation maps generated using the proposed method (μ-CNN), μ-MLAA, and 4-segment method (μ-segment) were compared with the μ-CT, a ground truth. We also compared the voxelwise correlation between the activity images reconstructed using ordered-subset expectation maximization with the μ-maps, and the SUVs of primary and metastatic bone lesions obtained by drawing regions of interest on the activity images. Results: The CNN generates less noisy attenuation maps and achieves better bone identification than MLAA. The average Dice similarity coefficient for bone regions between μ-CNN and μ-CT was 0.77, which was significantly higher than that between μ-MLAA and μ-CT (0.36). Also, the CNN result showed the best pixel-by-pixel correlation with the CT-based results and remarkably reduced differences in activity maps in comparison to CT-based attenuation correction. Conclusion: The proposed deep neural network produced a more reliable attenuation map for 511-keV photons than the 4-segment method currently used in whole-body PET/MRI studies.
We propose a new deep learning-based approach to provide more accurate whole-body PET/MRI attenuation correction than is possible with the Dixon-based 4-segment method. We use activity and attenuation maps estimated using the maximum-likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation (MLAA) algorithm as inputs to a convolutional neural network (CNN) to learn a CT-derived attenuation map. Methods: The whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT scan data of 100 cancerpatients (38 men and 62 women; age, 57.3 ± 14.1 y) were retrospectively used for training and testing the CNN. A modified U-net was trained to predict a CT-derived μ-map (μ-CT) from the MLAA-generated activity distribution (λ-MLAA) and μ-map (μ-MLAA). We used 1.3 million patches derived from 60 patients' data for training the CNN, data of 20 others were used as a validation set to prevent overfitting, and the data of the other 20 were used as a test set for the CNN performance analysis. The attenuation maps generated using the proposed method (μ-CNN), μ-MLAA, and 4-segment method (μ-segment) were compared with the μ-CT, a ground truth. We also compared the voxelwise correlation between the activity images reconstructed using ordered-subset expectation maximization with the μ-maps, and the SUVs of primary and metastatic bone lesions obtained by drawing regions of interest on the activity images. Results: The CNN generates less noisy attenuation maps and achieves better bone identification than MLAA. The average Dice similarity coefficient for bone regions between μ-CNN and μ-CT was 0.77, which was significantly higher than that between μ-MLAA and μ-CT (0.36). Also, the CNN result showed the best pixel-by-pixel correlation with the CT-based results and remarkably reduced differences in activity maps in comparison to CT-based attenuation correction. Conclusion: The proposed deep neural network produced a more reliable attenuation map for 511-keV photons than the 4-segment method currently used in whole-body PET/MRI studies.
Authors: Hyun Suk Yoon; Guen Bae Ko; Sun Il Kwon; Chan Mi Lee; Mikiko Ito; In Chan Song; Dong Soo Lee; Seong Jong Hong; Jae Sung Lee Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-03-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: André Salomon; Andreas Goedicke; Bernd Schweizer; Til Aach; Volkmar Schulz Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-11-29 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Ahmadreza Rezaei; Michel Defrise; Girish Bal; Christian Michel; Maurizio Conti; Charles Watson; Johan Nuyts Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Martin S Judenhofer; Hans F Wehrl; Danny F Newport; Ciprian Catana; Stefan B Siegel; Markus Becker; Axel Thielscher; Manfred Kneilling; Matthias P Lichy; Martin Eichner; Karin Klingel; Gerald Reischl; Stefan Widmaier; Martin Röcken; Robert E Nutt; Hans-Jürgen Machulla; Kamil Uludag; Simon R Cherry; Claus D Claussen; Bernd J Pichler Journal: Nat Med Date: 2008-03-23 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Sune H Keller; Søren Holm; Adam E Hansen; Bernhard Sattler; Flemming Andersen; Thomas L Klausen; Liselotte Højgaard; Andreas Kjær; Thomas Beyer Journal: MAGMA Date: 2012-09-21 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Vincent Keereman; Yves Fierens; Tom Broux; Yves De Deene; Max Lonneux; Stefaan Vandenberghe Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Axel Martinez-Möller; Michael Souvatzoglou; Gaspar Delso; Ralph A Bundschuh; Christophe Chefd'hotel; Sibylle I Ziegler; Nassir Navab; Markus Schwaiger; Stephan G Nekolla Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-03-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Harry R Marshall; Frank S Prato; Lela Deans; Jean Théberge; R Terry Thompson; Robert Z Stodilka Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-05-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Mahsa Torkaman; Jaewon Yang; Luyao Shi; Rui Wang; Edward J Miller; Albert J Sinusas; Chi Liu; Grant T Gullberg; Youngho Seo Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2021-02-15
Authors: Dimitris Visvikis; Philippe Lambin; Kim Beuschau Mauridsen; Roland Hustinx; Michael Lassmann; Christoph Rischpler; Kuangyu Shi; Jan Pruim Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-07-09 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Yabo Fu; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Jonathon A Nye; Xiaofeng Yang Journal: Phys Med Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 2.685
Authors: Kuang Gong; Jaewon Yang; Peder E Z Larson; Spencer C Behr; Thomas A Hope; Youngho Seo; Quanzheng Li Journal: IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci Date: 2020-07-03