Literature DB >> 30531259

Development of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Item Bank.

Theodore R McRackan1, Brittany N Hand2, Craig A Velozo2, Judy R Dubno1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Functional outcomes following cochlear implantation have traditionally been focused on word and sentence recognition, which, although important, do not capture the varied communication and other experiences of adult cochlear implant (CI) users. Although the inadequacies of speech recognition to quantify CI user benefits are widely acknowledged, rarely have adult CI user outcomes been comprehensively assessed beyond these conventional measures. An important limitation in addressing this knowledge gap is that patient-reported outcome measures have not been developed and validated in adult CI patients using rigorous scientific methods. The purpose of the present study is to build on our previous work and create an item bank that can be used to develop new patient-reported outcome measures that assess CI quality of life (QOL) in the adult CI population.
DESIGN: An online questionnaire was made available to 500 adult CI users who represented the adult CI population and were recruited through a consortium of 20 CI centers in the United States. The questionnaire included the 101 question CIQOL item pool and additional questions related to demographics, hearing and CI history, and speech recognition scores. In accordance with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, responses were psychometrically analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory.
RESULTS: Of the 500 questionnaires sent, 371 (74.2%) subjects completed the questionnaire. Subjects represented the full range of age, durations of CI use, speech recognition abilities, and listening modalities of the adult CI population; subjects were implanted with each of the three CI manufacturers' devices. The initial item pool consisted of the following domain constructs: communication, emotional, entertainment, environment, independence, listening effort, and social. Through psychometric analysis, after removing locally dependent and misfitting items, all of the domains were found to have sound psychometric properties, with the exception of the independence domain. This resulted in a final CIQOL item bank of 81 items in 6 domains with good psychometric properties.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal that hypothesis-driven quantitative analyses result in a psychometrically sound CIQOL item bank, organized into unique domains comprised of independent items which measure the full ability range of the adult CI population. The final item bank will now be used to develop new instruments that evaluate and differentiate adult CIQOL across the patient ability spectrum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30531259      PMCID: PMC6749825          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  47 in total

1.  Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire.

Authors:  J B Hinderink; P F Krabbe; P Van Den Broek
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness.

Authors:  John M Linacre
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2002

3.  Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Ron D Hays; Jakob B Bjorner; Karon F Cook; Paul K Crane; Jeanne A Teresi; David Thissen; Dennis A Revicki; David J Weiss; Ronald K Hambleton; Honghu Liu; Richard Gershon; Steven P Reise; Jin-shei Lai; David Cella
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Cochlear implantation and quality of life in postlingually deaf adults: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Godelieve W J A Damen; Andy J Beynon; Paul F M Krabbe; Jef J S Mulder; Emmanuel A M Mylanus
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests.

Authors:  G E PETERSON; I LEHISTE
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1962-02

6.  Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly.

Authors:  Katrien Vermeire; Jan P L Brokx; Floris L Wuyts; Ellen Cochet; Anouk Hofkens; Paul H Van de Heyning
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS qualitative item review.

Authors:  Darren A DeWalt; Nan Rothrock; Susan Yount; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years.

Authors:  David Cella; Susan Yount; Nan Rothrock; Richard Gershon; Karon Cook; Bryce Reeve; Deborah Ader; James F Fries; Bonnie Bruce; Mattias Rose
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Classical Test Theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction.

Authors:  Luis Prieto; Jordi Alonso; Rosa Lamarca
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-07-28       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; William Noble
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  16 in total

1.  The Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory and Screening Tool Based on Psychometric Reevaluation of the Hearing Handicap Inventories for the Elderly and Adults.

Authors:  Christy Cassarly; Lois J Matthews; Annie N Simpson; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  General Health Quality of Life Instruments Underestimate the Impact of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Joshua E Fabie; Prashant N Bhenswala; Shaun A Nguyen; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL): Development of a Profile Instrument (CIQOL-35 Profile) and a Global Measure (CIQOL-10 Global).

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Health-Related Quality of Life Changes Associated With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Peter R Dixon; David Feeny; George Tomlinson; Sharon Cushing; Joseph M Chen; Murray D Krahn
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.223

5.  Normative Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global Scores for Experienced Cochlear Implant Users from a Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Shreya Chidarala; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.619

6.  Understanding Patient Expectations Before Implantation Using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-Expectations Instrument.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Shreya Chidarala; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 8.961

7.  Association of Demographic and Hearing-Related Factors With Cochlear Implant-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.223

8.  A Longitudinal Comparison of Environmental Sound Recognition in Adults With Hearing Aids Before and After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Michael S Harris; Aaron C Moberly; Ben L Hamel; Kara Vasil; Christina L Runge; William J Riggs; Valeriy Shafiro
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.674

9.  Validity and reliability of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global instruments in comparison to legacy instruments.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Development of New Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Instruments for Adults.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2019-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.