Literature DB >> 33651956

A Longitudinal Comparison of Environmental Sound Recognition in Adults With Hearing Aids Before and After Cochlear Implantation.

Michael S Harris1,2, Aaron C Moberly3, Ben L Hamel4, Kara Vasil3, Christina L Runge1, William J Riggs3, Valeriy Shafiro5.   

Abstract

Purpose The aims of this study were (a) to longitudinally assess environmental sound recognition (ESR) before and after cochlear implantation in a sample of postlingually deafened adults and (b) to assess the extent to which spectro-temporal processing abilities influence ESR with cochlear implants (CIs). Method In a longitudinal cohort study, 20 postlingually deafened adults were tested with hearing aids on the Familiar Environmental Sound Test-Identification and AzBio sentences in quiet pre-CI and 6 months post-CI. A subset of 11 participants were also tested 12 months post-CI. Pre-CI spectro-temporal processing was assessed using the Spectral-temporally Modulated Ripple Test. Results Average ESR accuracy pre-CI (M = 63.60%) was not significantly different from ESR accuracy at 6 months (M = 65.40%) or 12 months (M = 69.09%) post-CI. In 11 participants (55%), however, ESR improved following implantation by 10.91 percentage points, on average. Pre-CI ESR correlated moderately and significantly with pre-CI and 12-month post-CI AzBio scores, with a trend toward significance for AzBio performance at 6 months. Pre-CI spectro-temporal processing was moderately associated with ESR at 6 and 12 months post-CI but not with speech recognition post-CI. Conclusions The present findings failed to demonstrate an overall significant improvement in ESR following implantation. Nevertheless, more than half of our sample showed some degree of improvement in ESR. Several environmental sounds were poorly identified both before and after implantation. Spectro-temporal processing ability prior to implantation appears to predict postimplantation performance for ESR. These findings indicate the need for greater attention to ESR following cochlear implantation and for developing individualized targets for ESR rehabilitation. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.13876745.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33651956      PMCID: PMC8608242          DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.674


  41 in total

1.  Spectral-temporal factors in the identification of environmental sounds.

Authors:  Brian Gygi; Gary R Kidd; Charles S Watson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A psychophysical method for measuring spatial resolution in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Mahan Azadpour; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-15

3.  Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Belinda A Henry; Christopher W Turner; Amy Behrens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials.

Authors:  G A MILLER; G A HEISE; W LICHTEN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1951-05

5.  Environmental sound perception of cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Janna Arnephy
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2010-12

6.  Dynamic current focusing for loudness encoding in cochlear implants: a take-home trial.

Authors:  Monique A M de Jong; Jeroen J Briaire; Séline F S van der Woude; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Leonid M Litvak; Susan Van Wie; Rene H Gifford; Philipos C Loizou; Louise M Loiselle; Tyler Oakes; Sarah Cook
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 8.  Cochlear implants in adults and children.

Authors: 
Journal:  NIH Consens Statement       Date:  1995 May 15-17

9.  Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Speech Perception by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Il Joon Moon; Sunhwa Jin; Heesung Park; Jihwan Woo; Yang-Sun Cho; Won-Ho Chung; Sung Hwa Hong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Relationship between Auditory and Cognitive Abilities in Older Adults.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; Valeriy Shafiro; Emily Wang; Lisa L Barnes; Raj C Shah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Perception of Environmental Sounds in Cochlear Implant Users: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Nathan Luzum; Aaron C Moberly; Michael S Harris
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 5.152

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.