Literature DB >> 11997586

Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness.

John M Linacre1.   

Abstract

Rating scales are employed as a means of extracting more information out of an item than would be obtained from a mere "yes/no", "right/wrong" or other dichotomy. But does this additional information increase measurement accuracy and precision? Eight guidelines are suggested to aid the analyst in optimizing the manner in which rating scales categories cooperate in order to improve the utility of the resultant measures. Though these guidelines are presented within the context of Rasch analysis, they reflect aspects of rating scale functioning which impact all methods of analysis. The guidelines feature rating-scale-based data such as category frequency, ordering, rating-to-measure inferential coherence, and the quality of the scale from measurement and statistical perspectives. The manner in which the guidelines prompt recategorization or reconceptualization of the rating scale is indicated. Utilization of the guidelines is illustrated through their application to two published data sets.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11997586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Meas        ISSN: 1529-7713


  206 in total

1.  Validation of the FACT-G scale for evaluating quality of life in cancer patients in Colombia.

Authors:  Ricardo Sánchez; Monica Ballesteros; Benjamin J Arnold
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Developing a Measure of Therapist Adherence to Contingency Management: An Application of the Many-Facet Rasch Model.

Authors:  Jason E Chapman; Ashli J Sheidow; Scott W Henggeler; Colleen Halliday-Boykins; Phillippe B Cunningham
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse       Date:  2008-06-01

3.  A new look at the WHOQOL as health-related quality of life instrument among visually impaired people using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Vijaya K Gothwal; Marmamula Srinivas; Gullapalli N Rao
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Dimensionality and Item-Difficulty Hierarchy of the Lower Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment in Individuals With Subacute and Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Chitralakshmi K Balasubramanian; Chih-Ying Li; Mark G Bowden; Pamela W Duncan; Steven A Kautz; Craig A Velozo
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Computer-adaptive balance testing improves discrimination between community-dwelling elderly fallers and nonfallers.

Authors:  Poonam K Pardasaney; Pengsheng Ni; Mary D Slavin; Nancy K Latham; Robert C Wagenaar; Jonathan Bean; Alan M Jette
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Measuring the concerns of cancer patients with low platelet counts: the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy--thrombocytopenia (FACT-Th) questionnaire.

Authors:  David Cella; Jennifer L Beaumont; Kimberly A Webster; Jin-Shei Lai; Linda Elting
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Assessing measurement properties of two single-item general health measures.

Authors:  Karen B DeSalvo; William P Fisher; Ky Tran; Nicole Bloser; William Merrill; John Peabody
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Is Rasch model analysis applicable in small sample size pilot studies for assessing item characteristics? An example using PROMIS pain behavior item bank data.

Authors:  Wen-Hung Chen; William Lenderking; Ying Jin; Kathleen W Wyrwich; Heather Gelhorn; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Measurement Properties of the Motivation for Youth Treatment Scale with a Residential Group Home Population.

Authors:  Matthew C Lambert; Kristin Duppong Hurley; M Michele Athay Tomlinson; Amy L Stevens
Journal:  Child Youth Care Forum       Date:  2013-12-01

10.  Development of the KOOSglobal Platform to Measure Patient-Reported Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Cale A Jacobs; Michael R Peabody; Christian Lattermann; Jose F Vega; Laura J Huston; Kurt P Spindler; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Robert H Brophy; Warren R Dunn; David C Flanigan; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Emily K Reinke; Michelle L Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Rick W Wright; Armando F Vidal
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.