Literature DB >> 35878634

Normative Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global Scores for Experienced Cochlear Implant Users from a Multi-Institutional Study.

Theodore R McRackan1, Brittany N Hand2, Shreya Chidarala1, Craig A Velozo2, Judy R Dubno1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although adult cochlear implant (CI) outcomes have primarily focused on speech recognition scores, the rigorous development of a CI-specific patient-reported outcome measure provides an opportunity for a more comprehensive and ecologically valid approach to measure the real-world functional abilities of adult CI users. Here, we report for the first time normative Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and global scores and variance for a large, multi-institutional sample of adult CI users. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study design.
SETTING: CI centers in the United States. PATIENTS: Seven hundred five adults with bilateral moderate to profound hearing loss with at least 1 year of CI use.
INTERVENTIONS: Cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CIQOL-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global scores.
RESULTS: During the development of the CIQOL instruments, 1,000 CI users from all regions of the United States were invited to participate in studies. Of these, 705 (70.5%) completed all portions of the study, and their data are reported here. Mean CIQOL domain scores were highest (indicating better function) for the emotional and social domains and lowest for listening effort. The entertainment and social domains demonstrated the widest distribution of scores and largest standard deviations, indicating greatest variability in function. Overall, there were minimal ceiling and floor effects for all domains.
CONCLUSION: Normative scores from a large sample of experienced adult CI users are consistent with clinical observations, showing large differences in functional abilities and large variability. Normative CIQOL data for adult CI users have the potential to enhance preoperative discussions with CI candidates, improve post-CI activation monitoring, and establish standards for CI centers.
Copyright © 2022, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35878634      PMCID: PMC9335896          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.619


  23 in total

1.  Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire.

Authors:  J B Hinderink; P F Krabbe; P Van Den Broek
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 2.  Current research on music perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Charles J Limb; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of quality-of-life improvement after cochlear implantation and associations with speech recognition abilities.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Michael Bauschard; Jonathan L Hatch; Emily Franko-Tobin; H Richard Droghini; Shaun A Nguyen; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  General Health Quality of Life Instruments Underestimate the Impact of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Joshua E Fabie; Prashant N Bhenswala; Shaun A Nguyen; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL): Development of a Profile Instrument (CIQOL-35 Profile) and a Global Measure (CIQOL-10 Global).

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Meta-analysis of Cochlear Implantation Outcomes Evaluated With General Health-related Patient-reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Michael Bauschard; Jonathan L Hatch; Emily Franko-Tobin; Harris Richard Droghini; Craig A Velozo; Shaun A Nguyen; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Music Appreciation after Cochlear Implantation in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Phoebe E Riley; Douglas S Ruhl; Macario Camacho; Anthony M Tolisano
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 9.  Assessment of music experience after cochlear implantation: A review of current tools and their utilization.

Authors:  Tiffany P Hwa; Christopher Z Wen; Michael J Ruckenstein
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-04-03

10.  Validity and reliability of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global instruments in comparison to legacy instruments.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

View more
  1 in total

1.  Understanding Patient Expectations Before Implantation Using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-Expectations Instrument.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Shreya Chidarala; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 8.961

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.