Literature DB >> 30896742

Association of Demographic and Hearing-Related Factors With Cochlear Implant-Related Quality of Life.

Theodore R McRackan1, Brittany N Hand2, Craig A Velozo3, Judy R Dubno1.   

Abstract

Importance: Only limited evidence is available describing the contribution of patient-related factors to quality of life in adults with cochlear implants. Objective: Assess the association between demographic, hearing-related, and cochlear implant-related factors and quality of life by using a new Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) item bank, which was developed to meet rigorous psychometric standards. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter cross-sectional study of adults 18 to 89 years of age who had at least 1 year of cochlear implant use and who were recruited through a consortium of 20 cochlear implant centers in the United States. Using an online format, questionnaires were sent to the first 500 participants who contacted the research team. Of these participants, 371 (74.2%) completed the questionnaire. Demographic, hearing-related, and cochlear implant-related data were obtained along with responses to each of the 81 items in the CIQOL item bank. Multivariable linear regression was used to examine demographic, hearing-related, and cochlear implant-related factors associated with scores in each of the 6 CIQOL domains (communication, emotional, entertainment, environment, listening effort, and social). Main Outcomes and Measures: Association among demographic, hearing-related, and cochlear implant-related factors and CIQOL scores for each of 6 domains.
Results: Of the 371 participants who completed the questionnaire, 222 (59.8%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 59.5 (14.9) years. The CIQOL scores were normally distributed across the 6 domains. Being employed, having higher household income, longer duration of hearing loss prior to cochlear implantation, and having bilateral rather than unilateral cochlear implantation were associated with higher CIQOL scores in 1 or more domains, but the effect size varied widely (β, 0.1-6.9). Better sentence recognition ability (using AzBio to measure speech recognition) was associated with only a small positive effect size for the communication (β, 0.0 [95% CI, 0.0-0.1]), entertainment (β, 0.0 [95% CI, 0.0-0.1]), and environmental (β, 0.0 [95% CI, 0.0-0.0]) domains. Increased age was associated with lower CIQOL in the entertainment domain (β, -0.3 [95% CI, -1.5 to -0.4]). The demographic, hearing-related, and cochlear implant-related factors included in the multivariable regression models accounted for only a small percentage of the variance in CIQOL domain scores (R2, 0.08-0.17). Conclusions and Relevance: Several factors were found to predict higher or lower CIQOL scores in specific domains, with speech-recognition ability having only a minimal association. Despite evaluating a large number of demographic, hearing-related, and cochlear implant-related factors, the multivariable models accounted for only a small amount of CIQOL variance. This suggests that patient or other characteristics that contribute to cochlear implant-related quality of life remain largely unknown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30896742      PMCID: PMC6537791          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.0055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  32 in total

1.  Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant.

Authors:  P Schleich; P Nopp; P D'Haese
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Development of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Item Bank.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of quality-of-life improvement after cochlear implantation and associations with speech recognition abilities.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Michael Bauschard; Jonathan L Hatch; Emily Franko-Tobin; H Richard Droghini; Shaun A Nguyen; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly.

Authors:  Katrien Vermeire; Jan P L Brokx; Floris L Wuyts; Ellen Cochet; Anouk Hofkens; Paul H Van de Heyning
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Meta-analysis of Cochlear Implantation Outcomes Evaluated With General Health-related Patient-reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Michael Bauschard; Jonathan L Hatch; Emily Franko-Tobin; Harris Richard Droghini; Craig A Velozo; Shaun A Nguyen; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?

Authors:  Natalie R Capretta; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Differential cochlear implant outcomes in older adults.

Authors:  Daniel S Roberts; Harrison W Lin; Barbara S Herrmann; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Auditory performance after cochlear implantation in late septuagenarians and octogenarians.

Authors:  Robert A Williamson; Kristen Pytynia; John S Oghalai; Jeffrey T Vrabec
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.

Authors:  Roland Laszig; Antje Aschendorff; Matthias Stecker; Joachim Müller-Deile; Steffen Maune; Norbert Dillier; Benno Weber; Matthias Hey; Klaus Begall; Thomas Lenarz; Rolf-D Battmer; Melanie Böhm; Thomas Steffens; Juergen Strutz; Thomas Linder; Rudolf Probst; John Allum; Martin Westhofen; Wolfgang Doering
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  10 in total

1.  Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL): Development of a Profile Instrument (CIQOL-35 Profile) and a Global Measure (CIQOL-10 Global).

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Caregiver Quality of Life After Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults.

Authors:  Alana Aylward; Steven A Gordon; Morganne Murphy-Meyers; Chelsea McCarty Allen; Neil S Patel; Richard K Gurgel
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Normative Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global Scores for Experienced Cochlear Implant Users from a Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Shreya Chidarala; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.619

4.  Understanding Patient Expectations Before Implantation Using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-Expectations Instrument.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Shreya Chidarala; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 8.961

5.  The Effectiveness of Unilateral Cochlear Implantation on Performance-Based and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Finnish Recipients.

Authors:  Aarno Dietz; Antje Heinrich; Timo Törmäkangas; Matti Iso-Mustajärvi; Petrus Miettinen; Tytti Willberg; Pia H Linder
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.152

6.  Validity and reliability of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global instruments in comparison to legacy instruments.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Quality of Life in Older Adults with Cochlear Implantation: Can It Be Equal to That of Healthy Older Adults?

Authors:  Taskin Tokat; Togay Müderris; Ergul Basaran Bozkurt; Uğurtan Ergun; Abdulhalim Aysel; Tolgahan Catli
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2021-04-16

Review 8.  The Impact of Cochlear Implantation: Cognitive Function, Quality of Life, and Frailty in Older Adults.

Authors:  Eric E Babajanian; Neil S Patel; Richard K Gurgel
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2021-12-09

9.  Role of Preoperative Patient Expectations in Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Priyanka Reddy; Mark S Costello; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Using Generic and Disease-Specific Measures to Assess Quality of Life before and after 12 Months of Hearing Implant Use: A Prospective, Longitudinal, Multicenter, Observational Clinical Study.

Authors:  Luis Lassaletta; Miryam Calvino; Isabel Sanchez-Cuadrado; Piotr Henryk Skarzynski; Katarzyna B Cywka; Natalia Czajka; Justyna Kutyba; Dayse Tavora-Vieira; Paul van de Heyning; Griet Mertens; Hinrich Staecker; Bryan Humphrey; Mario Zernotti; Maximo Zernotti; Astrid Magele; Marlene Ploder; Julia Speranza Zabeu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.