Literature DB >> 31124792

The Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory and Screening Tool Based on Psychometric Reevaluation of the Hearing Handicap Inventories for the Elderly and Adults.

Christy Cassarly1,2,3, Lois J Matthews2, Annie N Simpson2,3, Judy R Dubno2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluates the items of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly and Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHIE/A) using Mokken scale analysis (MSA), a type of nonparametric item response theory, and develops updated tools with optimal psychometric properties.
DESIGN: In a longitudinal study of age-related hearing loss, 1447 adults completed the HHIE/A and audiometric testing at baseline. Discriminant validity of the emotional consequences and social/situational effects subscales of the HHIE/A was assessed, and nonparametric item response theory was used to explore dimensionality of the items of the HHIE/A and to refine the scales.
RESULTS: The HHIE/A items form strong unidimensional scales measuring self-perceived hearing handicap, but with a lack of discriminant validity of the two distinct subscales. Two revised scales, the 18-item Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory and the 10-item Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory-Screening, were developed from the common items of the original HHIE/A that met the assumptions of MSA. The items on both of the revised scales can be ordered in terms of increasing difficulty.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that the newly developed Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory and Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory-Screening are strong unidimensional, clinically informative measures of self-perceived hearing handicap that can be used for adults of all ages. The real-data example also demonstrates that MSA is a valuable alternative to classical psychometric analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31124792      PMCID: PMC6864238          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  22 in total

1.  Development of the screening test for hearing problems.

Authors:  Marilyn E Demorest; David J Wark; Sue Ann Erdman
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Improving the quality and applicability of the Dutch scales of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired using item response theory.

Authors:  Lidwine B Mokkink; Dirk L Knol; Ruth M A van Nispen; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Hearing handicap ratings among different profiles of adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  William Noble; Richard Tyler; Camille Dunn; Navjot Bhullar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Index for rating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W J YOUDEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Development of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Item Bank.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Identification of elderly people with hearing problems.

Authors:  I M Ventry; B E Weinstein
Journal:  ASHA       Date:  1983-07

7.  Refinement and Validation of the Social Participation Restrictions Questionnaire: An Application of Rasch Analysis and Traditional Psychometric Analysis Techniques.

Authors:  Eithne Heffernan; David W Maidment; Johanna G Barry; Melanie A Ferguson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool.

Authors:  I M Ventry; B E Weinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study.

Authors:  K J Cruickshanks; T L Wiley; T S Tweed; B E Klein; R Klein; J A Mares-Perlman; D M Nondahl
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Risky business: factor analysis of survey data - assessing the probability of incorrect dimensionalisation.

Authors:  Cees van der Eijk; Jonathan Rose
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  12 in total

1.  Development and Refinement of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hearing: A Brief Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory.

Authors:  Christy Cassarly; Lois J Matthews; Annie N Simpson; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.493

Review 2.  Using Sox2 to alleviate the hallmarks of age-related hearing loss.

Authors:  Ebenezer N Yamoah; Mark Li; Anit Shah; Karen L Elliott; Kathy Cheah; Pin-Xian Xu; Stacia Phillips; Samuel M Young; Daniel F Eberl; Bernd Fritzsch
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 10.895

3.  The need for translation and cultural adaptation of audiology questionnaires to enable the development of hearing healthcare policies in the Pacific Islands: a Samoan perspective.

Authors:  Annette Kaspar; Sione Pifeleti; Carlie Driscoll
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2021-05-18

4.  Semantic context and stimulus variability independently affect rapid adaptation to non-native English speech in young adults.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Validity and reliability of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global instruments in comparison to legacy instruments.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  Sensitivity and Specificity of Pure-Tone and Subjective Hearing Screenings Using Spanish-Language Questions.

Authors:  Alyssa Everett; Aileen Wong; Rosie Piper; Barbara Cone; Nicole Marrone
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  An Approach to Self-Assessed Auditory Wellness in Older Adults.

Authors:  Larry E Humes
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Best Practices in the Development, Translation, and Cultural Adaptation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adults With Hearing Impairment: Lessons From the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Instruments.

Authors:  Ariane Laplante-Lévesque; Judy R Dubno; Isabelle Mosnier; Evelyne Ferrary; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 9.  Age-Related Hearing Loss: Sensory and Neural Etiology and Their Interdependence.

Authors:  Karen L Elliott; Bernd Fritzsch; Ebenezer N Yamoah; Azel Zine
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 5.750

10.  Development of the SWB-HL: A Scale of the Subjective Well-Being of Older Adults With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Larry E Humes
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.