Literature DB >> 11112975

Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire.

J B Hinderink1, P F Krabbe, P Van Den Broek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to develop a quantifiable, self-assessment health-related quality of life (QoL) instrument for use in cochlear implant (CI) users.
DESIGN: Three principal domains were distinguished: physical, psychological, and social. Forty-five postlingually deaf adult multichannel CI users and 46 deaf candidates on the waiting list for CIs (control group) participated in the study.
RESULTS: Retrospective scores for the CI group corresponded very well with the scores for the control group. Current QoL scores were substantially higher for all 6 subdomains. Internal consistency and testretest reliability coefficients proved to be satisfactory, and the ability to detect clinical changes with the Nijmegen Cochlear Implantation Questionnaire (NCIQ) proved to be good.
CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric characteristics of the NCIQ proved to be reliable and probably valid and sensitive to clinical changes. The data obtained with the NCIQ reflected that the instrument was able to detect that a CI had significant effects on several health-related QoL aspects, including the social and psychological domains.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11112975     DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2000.108203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  75 in total

1.  Use of Adult Patient Focus Groups to Develop the Initial Item Bank for a Cochlear Implant Quality-of-Life Instrument.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Craig A Velozo; Meredith A Holcomb; Elizabeth L Camposeo; Jonathan L Hatch; Ted A Meyer; Paul R Lambert; Cathy L Melvin; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things?

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Michael S Harris; Lauren Boyce; Kara Vasil; Taylor Wucinich; David B Pisoni; Jodi Baxter; Christin Ray; Valeriy Shafiro
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire into Italian.

Authors:  F Ottaviani; E Iacona; V Sykopetrites; A Schindler; F Mozzanica
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Quality of life in postlingually deaf patients following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Luis Lassaletta; Alejandro Castro; Marta Bastarrica; Maria José de Sarriá; Javier Gavilán
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-07-16       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Development of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Item Bank.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Meta-analysis of quality-of-life improvement after cochlear implantation and associations with speech recognition abilities.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Michael Bauschard; Jonathan L Hatch; Emily Franko-Tobin; H Richard Droghini; Shaun A Nguyen; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Quality of life and audiologic performance through the ability to phone of cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Cécile Rumeau; Julien Frère; Bettina Montaut-Verient; Alexis Lion; Gérome Gauchard; Cécile Parietti-Winkler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Quality of life in bimodal hearing users (unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aids).

Authors:  A Farinetti; S Roman; J Mancini; K Baumstarck-Barrau; R Meller; J P Lavieille; J M Triglia
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Late Cochlear Implantation in Early-Deafened Adults: A Detailed Analysis of Auditory and Self-Perceived Benefits.

Authors:  Joke Debruyne; Miranda Janssen; Jan Brokx
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 1.854

10.  Benefit of Baha in the elderly with single-sided deafness.

Authors:  Hubert T Faber; Maarten J F de Wolf; Cor W R J Cremers; Ad F M Snik; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.