Literature DB >> 30527634

The relationship between whole bone stiffness and strength is age and sex dependent.

Daniella M Patton1, Erin M R Bigelow1, Stephen H Schlecht2, David H Kohn3, Todd L Bredbenner4, Karl J Jepsen5.   

Abstract

Accurately estimating whole bone strength is critical for identifying individuals that may benefit from prophylactic treatments aimed at reducing fracture risk. Strength is often estimated from stiffness, but it is not known whether the relationship between stiffness and strength varies with age and sex. Cadaveric proximal femurs (44 Male: 18-78 years; 40 Female: 24-95 years) and radial (36 Male: 18-89 years; 19 Female: 24-95 years) and femoral diaphyses (34 Male: 18-89 years; 19 Female: 24-95 years) were loaded to failure to evaluate how the stiffness-strength relationship varies with age and sex. Strength correlated significantly with stiffness at all sites and for both sexes, as expected. However, females exhibited significantly less strength for the proximal femur (58% difference, p < 0.001). Multivariate regressions revealed that stiffness, age and PYD were significant negative independent predictors of strength for the proximal femur (Age: M: p = 0.005, F: p < 0.001, PYD: M: p = 0.022, F: p = 0.025), radial diaphysis (Age: M = 0.055, PYD: F = 0.024), and femoral diaphysis (Age: M: p = 0.014, F: p = 0.097, PYD: M: p = 0.003, F: p = 0.091). These results indicated that older bones tended to be significantly weaker for a given stiffness than younger bones. These results suggested that human bones exhibit diminishing strength relative to stiffness with aging and with decreasing PYD. Incorporating these age- and sex-specific factors may help to improve the accuracy of strength estimates.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Biomechanics; Bone; Men; Sexual dimorphism; Strength; Women

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30527634      PMCID: PMC6338331          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.11.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  40 in total

1.  Bone stiffness predicts strength similarly for human vertebral cancellous bone in compression and for cortical bone in tension.

Authors:  D P Fyhrie; D Vashishth
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Bone strength at clinically relevant sites displays substantial heterogeneity and is best predicted from site-specific bone densitometry.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Christoph A Lill; Volker Kuhn; Erich Schneider; Günter Delling; Ralph Müller
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  The aging cortex: to crack or not to crack.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Males have larger skeletal size and bone mass than females, despite comparable body size.

Authors:  Jeri W Nieves; Carmelo Formica; Jamie Ruffing; Marsha Zion; Patricia Garrett; Robert Lindsay; Felicia Cosman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-10-11       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Human ulnar bending stiffness, mineral content, geometry and strength.

Authors:  J M Jurist; A S Foltz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Dynamic response of bone and muscle tissue.

Authors:  J H McElhaney
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 3.531

Review 7.  Gender differences in osteoporosis and fractures.

Authors:  Peggy M Cawthon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Femoral Strength Changes Faster With Age Than BMD in Both Women and Men: A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Dan Dragomir-Daescu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Biological constraints that limit compensation of a common skeletal trait variant lead to inequivalence of tibial function among healthy young adults.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Amanda Centi; G Felipe Duarte; Kathleen Galloway; Haviva Goldman; Naomi Hampson; Joan M Lappe; Diane M Cullen; Julie Greeves; Rachel Izard; Bradley C Nindl; William J Kraemer; Charles H Negus; Rachel K Evans
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Bone strength at the distal radius can be estimated from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography and the finite element method.

Authors:  Joshua A Macneil; Steven K Boyd
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  10 in total

1.  External Bone Size Is a Key Determinant of Strength-Decline Trajectories of Aging Male Radii.

Authors:  Erin Mr Bigelow; Daniella M Patton; Ferrous S Ward; Antonio Ciarelli; Michael Casden; Andrea Clark; Robert W Goulet; Michael D Morris; Stephen H Schlecht; Gurjit S Mandair; Todd L Bredbenner; David H Kohn; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  External bone size identifies different strength-decline trajectories for the male human femora.

Authors:  Morgan W Bolger; Genevieve E Romanowicz; Erin M R Bigelow; Ferrous S Ward; Antonio Ciarelli; Karl J Jepsen; David H Kohn
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  Assessing the Elasticity of Child Cortical Bone.

Authors:  Cécile Baron; Hélène Follet; Martine Pithioux; Cédric Payan; Philippe Lasaygues
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 4.  How Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Is Assisting Us to Extract Meaning from Data on Bone Mechanics?

Authors:  Saeed Mouloodi; Hadi Rahmanpanah; Colin Martin; Soheil Gohari; Helen M S Davies
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 5.  MRI-based mechanical competence assessment of bone using micro finite element analysis (micro-FEA): Review.

Authors:  Saeed Jerban; Salem Alenezi; Amir Masoud Afsahi; Yajun Ma; Jiang Du; Christine B Chung; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  One-Year Mean A1c of > 7% is Associated with Poor Bone Microarchitecture and Strength in Men with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Elliot Ballato; F N U Deepika; Vittoria Russo; Alcibiades Fleires-Gutiérrez; Georgia Colleluori; Virginia Fuenmayor; Rui Chen; Dennis T Villareal; Clifford Qualls; Reina Armamento-Villareal
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Computed Tomography-Based Stiffness Measures of Trabecular Bone Microstructure: Cadaveric Validation and In Vivo Application.

Authors:  Indranil Guha; Xialiou Zhang; Chamith S Rajapakse; Elena M Letuchy; Gregory Chang; Kathleen F Janz; James C Torner; Steven M Levy; Punam K Saha
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2022-05-05

8.  Cortical bone relationships are maintained regardless of sex and diet in a large population of LGXSM advanced intercross mice.

Authors:  Nicole Migotsky; Michael D Brodt; James M Cheverud; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2022-08-26

9.  Sex and External Size Specific Limitations in Assessing Bone Health From Adult Hand Radiographs.

Authors:  Erin M R Bigelow; Robert W Goulet; Antonio Ciarelli; Stephen H Schlecht; David H Kohn; Todd L Bredbenner; Sioban D Harlow; Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2022-06-29

10.  Mechanical metric for skeletal biomechanics derived from spectral analysis of stiffness matrix.

Authors:  Petr Henyš; Michal Kuchař; Petr Hájek; Niels Hammer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.