Literature DB >> 30715752

External Bone Size Is a Key Determinant of Strength-Decline Trajectories of Aging Male Radii.

Erin Mr Bigelow1, Daniella M Patton1,2, Ferrous S Ward1,2, Antonio Ciarelli1,3, Michael Casden4, Andrea Clark1, Robert W Goulet1, Michael D Morris5, Stephen H Schlecht3, Gurjit S Mandair6, Todd L Bredbenner7, David H Kohn2,6, Karl J Jepsen1,2.   

Abstract

Given prior work showing associations between remodeling and external bone size, we tested the hypothesis that wide bones would show a greater negative correlation between whole-bone strength and age compared with narrow bones. Cadaveric male radii (n = 37 pairs, 18 to 89 years old) were evaluated biomechanically, and samples were sorted into narrow and wide subgroups using height-adjusted robustness (total area/bone length). Strength was 54% greater (p < 0.0001) in wide compared with narrow radii for young adults (<40 years old). However, the greater strength of young-adult wide radii was not observed for older wide radii, as the wide (R2  = 0.565, p = 0.001), but not narrow (R2  = 0.0004, p = 0.944) subgroup showed a significant negative correlation between strength and age. Significant positive correlations between age and robustness (R2  = 0.269, p = 0.048), cortical area (Ct.Ar; R2  = 0.356, p = 0.019), and the mineral/matrix ratio (MMR; R2  = 0.293, p = 0.037) were observed for narrow, but not wide radii (robustness: R2  = 0.015, p = 0.217; Ct.Ar: R2  = 0.095, p = 0.245; MMR: R2  = 0.086, p = 0.271). Porosity increased with age for the narrow (R2  = 0.556, p = 0.001) and wide (R2  = 0.321, p = 0.022) subgroups. The wide subgroup (p < 0.0001) showed a significantly greater elevation of a new measure called the Cortical Pore Score, which quantifies the cumulative effect of pore size and location, indicating that porosity had a more deleterious effect on strength for wide compared with narrow radii. Thus, the divergent strength-age regressions implied that narrow radii maintained a low strength with aging by increasing external size and mineral content to mechanically offset increases in porosity. In contrast, the significant negative strength-age correlation for wide radii implied that the deleterious effect of greater porosity further from the centroid was not offset by changes in outer bone size or mineral content. Thus, the low strength of elderly male radii arose through different biomechanical mechanisms. Consideration of different strength-age regressions (trajectories) may inform clinical decisions on how best to treat individuals to reduce fracture risk.
© 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AGING; BIOMECHANICAL MECHANISMS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE; MALE; PERIOSTEAL EXPANSION; RADII; STRENGTH

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30715752      PMCID: PMC6536328          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  72 in total

1.  Periosteal bone formation--a neglected determinant of bone strength.

Authors:  Ego Seeman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Growth in bone strength, body size, and muscle size in a juvenile longitudinal sample.

Authors:  Christopher Ruff
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Effects of current and discontinued estrogen replacement therapy on hip structural geometry: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  T J Beck; K L Stone; T L Oreskovic; M C Hochberg; M C Nevitt; H K Genant; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Ground reaction forces, bone characteristics, and tibial stress fracture in male runners.

Authors:  K Crossley; K L Bennell; T Wrigley; B W Oakes
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Does body size account for gender differences in femur bone density and geometry?

Authors:  A C Looker; T J Beck; E S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Stress fracture in military recruits: gender differences in muscle and bone susceptibility factors.

Authors:  T J Beck; C B Ruff; R A Shaffer; K Betsinger; D W Trone; S K Brodine
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Structural trends in the aging femoral neck and proximal shaft: analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data.

Authors:  T J Beck; A C Looker; C B Ruff; H Sievanen; H W Wahner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  FEMORAL EXPANSION IN AGING WOMEN: IMPLICATIONS FOR OSTEOPOROSIS AND FRACTURES.

Authors:  R W SMITH; R R WALKER
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-07-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Bone loss and bone size after menopause.

Authors:  Henrik G Ahlborg; Olof Johnell; Charles H Turner; Gunnar Rannevik; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know.

Authors:  Donald P Frush; Lane F Donnelly; Nancy S Rosen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  5 in total

1.  External bone size identifies different strength-decline trajectories for the male human femora.

Authors:  Morgan W Bolger; Genevieve E Romanowicz; Erin M R Bigelow; Ferrous S Ward; Antonio Ciarelli; Karl J Jepsen; David H Kohn
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.867

2.  Axial Transmission: Techniques, Devices and Clinical Results.

Authors:  Nicolas Bochud; Pascal Laugier
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Bone Microarchitecture Phenotypes Identified in Older Adults Are Associated With Different Levels of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Danielle E Whittier; Elizabeth J Samelson; Marian T Hannan; Lauren A Burt; David A Hanley; Emmanuel Biver; Pawel Szulc; Elisabeth Sornay-Rendu; Blandine Merle; Roland Chapurlat; Eric Lespessailles; Andy Kin On Wong; David Goltzman; Sundeep Khosla; Serge Ferrari; Mary L Bouxsein; Douglas P Kiel; Steven K Boyd
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.390

4.  Sex and External Size Specific Limitations in Assessing Bone Health From Adult Hand Radiographs.

Authors:  Erin M R Bigelow; Robert W Goulet; Antonio Ciarelli; Stephen H Schlecht; David H Kohn; Todd L Bredbenner; Sioban D Harlow; Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2022-06-29

5.  Therapeutic Interventions to Reduce Radiation Induced Dermal Injury in a Murine Model of Tissue Expander Based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Alexandra O Luby; Alicia E Snider; Gurjit S Mandair; Kevin M Urlaub; Jeremy V Lynn; Noah S Nelson; Alexis Donneys; Russell E Ettinger; Geoffrey C Gurtner; David Kohn; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.763

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.