Literature DB >> 21898595

Biological constraints that limit compensation of a common skeletal trait variant lead to inequivalence of tibial function among healthy young adults.

Karl J Jepsen1, Amanda Centi, G Felipe Duarte, Kathleen Galloway, Haviva Goldman, Naomi Hampson, Joan M Lappe, Diane M Cullen, Julie Greeves, Rachel Izard, Bradley C Nindl, William J Kraemer, Charles H Negus, Rachel K Evans.   

Abstract

Having a better understanding of how complex systems like bone compensate for the natural variation in bone width to establish mechanical function will benefit efforts to identify traits contributing to fracture risk. Using a collection of pQCT images of the tibial diaphysis from 696 young adult women and men, we tested the hypothesis that bone cells cannot surmount the nonlinear relationship between bone width and whole bone stiffness to establish functional equivalence across a healthy population. Intrinsic cellular constraints limited the degree of compensation, leading to functional inequivalence relative to robustness, with slender tibias being as much as two to three times less stiff relative to body size compared with robust tibias. Using Path Analysis, we identified a network of compensatory trait interactions that explained 79% of the variation in whole-bone bending stiffness. Although slender tibias had significantly less cortical area relative to body size compared with robust tibias, it was the limited range in tissue modulus that was largely responsible for the functional inequivalence. Bone cells coordinately modulated mineralization as well as the cortical porosity associated with internal bone multicellular units (BMU)-based remodeling to adjust tissue modulus to compensate for robustness. Although anecdotal evidence suggests that functional inequivalence is tolerated under normal loading conditions, our concern is that the functional deficit of slender tibias may contribute to fracture susceptibility under extreme loading conditions, such as intense exercise during military training or falls in the elderly. Thus, we show the natural variation in bone robustness was associated with predictable functional deficits that were attributable to cellular constraints limiting the amount of compensation permissible in human long bone. Whether these cellular constraints can be circumvented prophylactically to better equilibrate function among individuals remains to be determined.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21898595     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  19 in total

1.  Zoledronate treatment has different effects in mouse strains with contrasting baseline bone mechanical phenotypes.

Authors:  M W Aref; E M B McNerny; D Brown; K J Jepsen; M R Allen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Femoral Neck External Size but not aBMD Predicts Structural and Mass Changes for Women Transitioning Through Menopause.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Andrew Kozminski; Erin Mr Bigelow; Stephen H Schlecht; Robert W Goulet; Sioban D Harlow; Jane A Cauley; Carrie Karvonen-Gutierrez
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  The amount of periosteal apposition required to maintain bone strength during aging depends on adult bone morphology and tissue-modulus degradation rate.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Nelly Andarawis-Puri
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  External Bone Size Is a Key Determinant of Strength-Decline Trajectories of Aging Male Radii.

Authors:  Erin Mr Bigelow; Daniella M Patton; Ferrous S Ward; Antonio Ciarelli; Michael Casden; Andrea Clark; Robert W Goulet; Michael D Morris; Stephen H Schlecht; Gurjit S Mandair; Todd L Bredbenner; David H Kohn; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Early-phase musculoskeletal adaptations to different levels of eccentric resistance after 8 weeks of lower body training.

Authors:  Kirk L English; James A Loehr; Stuart M C Lee; Scott M Smith
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Physiological employment standards IV: integration of women in combat units physiological and medical considerations.

Authors:  Yoram Epstein; Ran Yanovich; Daniel S Moran; Yuval Heled
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  The relationship between whole bone stiffness and strength is age and sex dependent.

Authors:  Daniella M Patton; Erin M R Bigelow; Stephen H Schlecht; David H Kohn; Todd L Bredbenner; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Mapping the natural variation in whole bone stiffness and strength across skeletal sites.

Authors:  Stephen H Schlecht; Erin M R Bigelow; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Intracortical remodeling parameters are associated with measures of bone robustness.

Authors:  Haviva M Goldman; Naomi A Hampson; J Jared Guth; David Lin; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 10.  Are we taking full advantage of the growing number of pharmacological treatment options for osteoporosis?

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Stephen H Schlecht; Kenneth M Kozloff
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.