Literature DB >> 26096829

Femoral Strength Changes Faster With Age Than BMD in Both Women and Men: A Biomechanical Study.

Asghar Rezaei1,2, Dan Dragomir-Daescu1,3.   

Abstract

Although a large number of studies have addressed the age-related changes in bone mineral density (BMD), there is a paucity of data for the assessment of femoral strength loss with age in both genders. We determined the variation of strength with age in femurs of women and men by mechanical tests on a cohort of 100 cadaveric femurs. In addition, the age-related neck BMD loss in our cadaveric cohort was found to be similar with BMD loss of four published population-based studies. Given the strong correlation found in our cadaveric study between BMD and femoral strength, we also estimated the femoral strength of the four populations based on their reported neck BMDs. Our study showed that men's femurs in our cadaveric cohort were stronger than women's femurs by about 800 N at the same BMD level, and by 1750 N at the same age. The strength differences were not explained satisfactorily by the size difference between men's and women's bones. Similar to the findings of clinical studies, the BMD values of men at all ages were larger than that of women. The age-related loss rates in BMD and strength were not statistically different between the two genders of our cadaveric cohort. After normalization, strength decreased more than 40% faster than BMD. On average, men reached a certain BMD value about 16 years later than women, and for strength about 23 years later, which may explain the higher rate of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. In patient population cohorts men reached a similar BMD value about 16 to 25 years later than women, whereas for estimated strength, sometimes more than 40 years later.
© 2015 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AGE-RELATED BONE LOSS; BONE MINERAL DENSITY; CADAVERIC TESTS; FEMORAL FRACTURE; HIP FRACTURE; OSTEOPOROSIS

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26096829     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  11 in total

1.  Optimizing Accuracy of Proximal Femur Elastic Modulus Equations.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Kent D Carlson; Hugo Giambini; Samad Javid; Dan Dragomir-Daescu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Factors associated with proximal femur fracture determined in a large cadaveric cohort.

Authors:  Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Timothy L Rossman; Asghar Rezaei; Kent D Carlson; David F Kallmes; John A Skinner; Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Are DXA/aBMD and QCT/FEA Stiffness and Strength Estimates Sensitive to Sex and Age?

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Hugo Giambini; Timothy Rossman; Kent D Carlson; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu; Dan Dragomir-Daescu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Asghar Rezaei; Susheil Uthamaraj; Timothy Rossman; James T Bronk; Mark Bolander; Vincent Lambert; Sean McEligot; Rachel Entwistle; Hugo Giambini; Iwona Jasiuk; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Method and Instrumented Fixture for Femoral Fracture Testing in a Sideways Fall-on-the-Hip Position.

Authors:  Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Asghar Rezaei; Timothy Rossman; Susheil Uthamaraj; Rachel Entwistle; Sean McEligot; Vincent Lambert; Hugo Giambini; Iwona Jasiuk; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  The relationship between whole bone stiffness and strength is age and sex dependent.

Authors:  Daniella M Patton; Erin M R Bigelow; Stephen H Schlecht; David H Kohn; Todd L Bredbenner; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  A systematic approach to the scale separation problem in the development of multiscale models.

Authors:  Pinaki Bhattacharya; Qiao Li; Damien Lacroix; Visakan Kadirkamanathan; Marco Viceconti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The trabecular effect: A population-based longitudinal study on age and sex differences in bone mineral density and vertebral load bearing capacity.

Authors:  Marianna L Oppenheimer-Velez; Hugo Giambini; Asghar Rezaei; Jon J Camp; Sundeep Khosla; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 9.  Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Ginu U Unnikrisnan; Amira I Hussein
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 9.590

10.  CT-based structural analyses of vertebral fractures with polymeric augmentation: A study of cadaveric three-level spine segments.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Hugo Giambini; Alan L Miller Ii; Hao Xu; Haocheng Xu; Yong Li; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 6.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.