Literature DB >> 15746999

Males have larger skeletal size and bone mass than females, despite comparable body size.

Jeri W Nieves1, Carmelo Formica, Jamie Ruffing, Marsha Zion, Patricia Garrett, Robert Lindsay, Felicia Cosman.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Gender differences in fractures may be related to body size, bone size, geometry, or density. We studied this in 18-year-old males (n = 36) and females (n = 36) matched for height and weight. Despite comparable body size, males have greater BMC and BMD at the hip and distal tibia and greater tibial cortical thickness. This may confer greater skeletal integrity in males.
INTRODUCTION: Gender differences in fractures may be related to body size, bone size, geometry, or density. We studied this in males (n = 36) and females (n = 36; mean age = 18 years) pair-matched for height and weight.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: BMC, bone area (BA), and BMD were measured in the spine and hip using DXA. Distal tibia was measured by pQCT. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Males had a higher lean mass (92%) compared with females (79%). No gender differences were observed for vertebral BMC or vertebral height, although males had greater width and thus BA at the spine. Males had greater BMC and BA at the femoral neck and total femur (p < 0.02). Geometric variables of the hip including neck diameter and neck-axis length were also greater in males (p < 0.02). There was greater cross-sectional moment of inertia, safety factor, and fall index in males (all p < 0.02). Males had greater tibial BMC, volumetric BMD, and cortical area and thickness compared with females (p < 0.01), with both greater periosteal circumference (p = 0.011) and smaller endosteal circumference (p = 0.058). Statistically controlling for lean mass reduced gender differences, but males still had 8% higher hip BMD (p = 0.24) and 5.3% higher total tibial BMD (p = 0.05). A subset of males and females were matched (n = 14 pairs) for total hip BA. Males in this subset still had greater BMC and BMD at the total hip (p < 0.05) than females, despite similar BA. In summary, despite comparable body size, males have greater BMC and BMD than females at the hip and distal tibia but not at the spine. Differences in BMC and BMD were related to greater cortical thickness in the tibia. We conclude that differences in bone mass and geometry confer greater skeletal integrity in males, which may contribute to the lower incidence of stress and osteoporotic fractures in males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15746999     DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.041005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  75 in total

1.  Obesity augments calcium-induced increases in skeletal calcium retention in adolescents.

Authors:  Kathleen M Hill; Michelle M Braun; Kara A Egan; Berdine R Martin; Linda D McCabe; Munro Peacock; George P McCabe; Connie M Weaver
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Preservation and promotion of bone formation in the mandible as a response to a novel calcium-phosphate based biomaterial in mineral deficiency induced low bone mass male versus female rats.

Authors:  Kritika Srinivasan; Diana P Naula; Dindo Q Mijares; Malvin N Janal; Racquel Z LeGeros; Yu Zhang
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Total and regional bone mineral content in healthy Spanish subjects by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  S Aguado Henche; R Rodríguez Torres; C Clemente de Arriba; L Gómez Pellico
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  In vivo 3D reconstruction of human vertebrae with the three-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA) method.

Authors:  S Kolta; S Quiligotti; A Ruyssen-Witrand; A Amido; D Mitton; A Le Bras; W Skalli; C Roux
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Is the femoral lateral condyle's bone morphology the trochlea of the ACL?

Authors:  Margarida Sá Fernandes; Rogério Pereira; Renato Andrade; Sebastiano Vasta; Hélder Pereira; João Páscoa Pinheiro; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  A longitudinal comparison of appendicular bone growth and markers of strength through adolescence in a South African cohort using radiogrammetry and pQCT.

Authors:  A Magan; L K Micklesfield; L H Nyati; S A Norris; J M Pettifor
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Sex-Differences in Skeletal Growth and Aging.

Authors:  Jeri W Nieves
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Physical activity and inactivity and risk of hip fractures in men.

Authors:  Diane Feskanich; Alan J Flint; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Basic science considerations in primary total hip replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Saqeb B Mirza; Douglas G Dunlop; Sukhmeet S Panesar; Syed G Naqvi; Shafat Gangoo; Saif Salih
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-05-11

10.  Mapping the natural variation in whole bone stiffness and strength across skeletal sites.

Authors:  Stephen H Schlecht; Erin M R Bigelow; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.