Literature DB >> 33096230

External bone size identifies different strength-decline trajectories for the male human femora.

Morgan W Bolger1, Genevieve E Romanowicz2, Erin M R Bigelow3, Ferrous S Ward4, Antonio Ciarelli5, Karl J Jepsen4, David H Kohn6.   

Abstract

Understanding skeletal aging and predicting fracture risk is increasingly important with a growing elderly population. We hypothesized that when categorized by external bone size, the male femoral diaphysis would show different strength-age trajectories which can be explained by changes in morphology, composition and collagen cross-linking. Cadaveric male femora were sorted into narrow (n = 15, 26-89 years) and wide (n = 15, 29-82 years) groups based upon total cross-sectional area of the mid-shaft normalized to bone length (Tt.Ar/Le) and tested for whole bone strength, tissue-level strength, and tissue-level post-yield strain. Morphology, cortical TMD (Ct.TMD), porosity, direct measurements of enzymatic collagen cross-links, and pentosidine were obtained. The wide group alone showed significant negative correlations with age for tissue-level strength (R2 = 0.50, p = 0.002), tissue-level post-yield strain (R2 = 0.75, p < 0.001) and borderline significance for whole bone strength (R2 = 0.14, p = 0.108). Ct.TMD correlated with whole bone and tissue-level strength for both groups, but pentosidine normalized to enzymatic cross-links correlated negatively with all mechanical properties for the wide group only. The multivariate analysis showed that just three traits for each mechanical property explained the majority of the variance for whole bone strength (Ct.Area, Ct.TMD, Log(PEN/Mature; R2 = 0.75), tissue-level strength (Age, Ct.TMD, Log(DHLNL/HLNL); R2 = 0.56), and post-yield strain (Age, Log(Pyrrole), Ct.Area; R2 = 0.51). Overall, this highlights how inter-individual differences in bone structure, composition, and strength change with aging and that a one-size fits all understanding of skeletal aging is insufficient.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Bone; Collagen cross-links; Femora; Male; Strength

Year:  2020        PMID: 33096230      PMCID: PMC7744353          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2020.107650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Biol        ISSN: 1047-8477            Impact factor:   2.867


  35 in total

1.  Variation in childhood skeletal robustness is an important determinant of cortical area in young adults.

Authors:  Siddharth Bhola; Julia Chen; Joseph Fusco; G Felipe Duarte; Nelly Andarawis-Puri; Richard Ghillani; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Comparison of non-invasive assessments of strength of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Fjola Johannesdottir; Erica Thrall; John Muller; Tony M Keaveny; David L Kopperdahl; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Effects of Collagen Crosslinking on Bone Material Properties in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Mitsuru Saito; Keishi Marumo
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Lifetime sport and leisure activity participation is associated with greater bone size, quality and strength in older men.

Authors:  R M Daly; S L Bass
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Inter-sex differences in structural properties of aging femora: implications on differential bone fragility: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Danijela Djonic; Petar Milovanovic; Slobodan Nikolic; Miomira Ivovic; Jelena Marinkovic; Thomas Beck; Marija Djuric
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 6.  Changes in bone matrix properties with aging.

Authors:  David B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.

Authors:  Caroline A Schneider; Wayne S Rasband; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Intracortical remodeling parameters are associated with measures of bone robustness.

Authors:  Haviva M Goldman; Naomi A Hampson; J Jared Guth; David Lin; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  Biological co-adaptation of morphological and composition traits contributes to mechanical functionality and skeletal fragility.

Authors:  Steven M Tommasini; Philip Nasser; Bin Hu; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Bone fracture toughness and strength correlate with collagen cross-link maturity in a dose-controlled lathyrism mouse model.

Authors:  Erin M B McNerny; Bo Gong; Michael D Morris; David H Kohn
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bone Microarchitecture Phenotypes Identified in Older Adults Are Associated With Different Levels of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Danielle E Whittier; Elizabeth J Samelson; Marian T Hannan; Lauren A Burt; David A Hanley; Emmanuel Biver; Pawel Szulc; Elisabeth Sornay-Rendu; Blandine Merle; Roland Chapurlat; Eric Lespessailles; Andy Kin On Wong; David Goltzman; Sundeep Khosla; Serge Ferrari; Mary L Bouxsein; Douglas P Kiel; Steven K Boyd
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.390

2.  Preventive Care for Adults With Cerebral Palsy and Other Neurodevelopmental Disabilities: Are We Missing the Point?

Authors:  Daniel G Whitney; Michelle L Rabideau; Michael McKee; Edward A Hurvitz
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-07

Review 3.  Bringing Mechanical Context to Image-Based Measurements of Bone Integrity.

Authors:  Lindsay L Loundagain; Todd L Bredbenner; Karl J Jepsen; W Brent Edwards
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.096

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.