PURPOSE: Racial minority populations are underrepresented in genomics research. This study enrolled African-descended individuals in a sequencing study and reported their characteristics. METHODS: We purposively recruited 467 individuals self-identified as African, African American, or Afro-Caribbean to the ClinSeq® study and surveyed them about knowledge, motivations, expectations, and traits. Summary statistics were calculated and compared with data from the study's original cohort, which was primarily White and self-referred. RESULTS: Recruitment took five years and 83% of enrollees completed the survey. Participants had modest knowledge about benefits and limitations of sequencing (x̅s = 5.1, ranges: 0-10), and less than the original cohort (x̅ = 7.5 and 7.7, respectively). Common motivations to enroll were learning information relevant to personal health (49%) or family members' health (33%), and most had realistic expectations of sequencing. Like the original cohort, they had high levels of optimism, openness, and resilience. CONCLUSION: Early adopters may have relatively consistent personality traits irrespective of majority/minority status and recruitment methods, but high levels of genomics knowledge are not universal. Research should determine whether recruitment and consent procedures provide adequate education to promote informed choices and realistic expectations, which are vital to ethical research and increasing genomics research participation in underrepresented communities.
PURPOSE: Racial minority populations are underrepresented in genomics research. This study enrolled African-descended individuals in a sequencing study and reported their characteristics. METHODS: We purposively recruited 467 individuals self-identified as African, African American, or Afro-Caribbean to the ClinSeq® study and surveyed them about knowledge, motivations, expectations, and traits. Summary statistics were calculated and compared with data from the study's original cohort, which was primarily White and self-referred. RESULTS: Recruitment took five years and 83% of enrollees completed the survey. Participants had modest knowledge about benefits and limitations of sequencing (x̅s = 5.1, ranges: 0-10), and less than the original cohort (x̅ = 7.5 and 7.7, respectively). Common motivations to enroll were learning information relevant to personal health (49%) or family members' health (33%), and most had realistic expectations of sequencing. Like the original cohort, they had high levels of optimism, openness, and resilience. CONCLUSION: Early adopters may have relatively consistent personality traits irrespective of majority/minority status and recruitment methods, but high levels of genomics knowledge are not universal. Research should determine whether recruitment and consent procedures provide adequate education to promote informed choices and realistic expectations, which are vital to ethical research and increasing genomics research participation in underrepresented communities.
Entities:
Keywords:
diversity; early adopters; genome sequencing; informed choice; recruitment
Authors: Saskia C Sanderson; Michael A Diefenbach; Randi Zinberg; Carol R Horowitz; Margaret Smirnoff; Micol Zweig; Samantha Streicher; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Lynne D Richardson Journal: J Community Genet Date: 2013-06-22
Authors: K A Kaphingst; F M Facio; M-R Cheng; S Brooks; H Eidem; A Linn; B B Biesecker; L G Biesecker Journal: Clin Genet Date: 2012-08-07 Impact factor: 4.438
Authors: Katie L Lewis; Paul K J Han; Gillian W Hooker; William M P Klein; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Stacy W Gray; Elyse R Park; Julie Najita; Yolanda Martins; Lara Traeger; Elizabeth Bair; Joshua Gagne; Judy Garber; Pasi A Jänne; Neal Lindeman; Carol Lowenstein; Nelly Oliver; Lynette Sholl; Eliezer M Van Allen; Nikhil Wagle; Sam Wood; Levi Garraway; Steven Joffe Journal: Genet Med Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Tia L Kauffman; Stephanie A Irving; Michael C Leo; Marian J Gilmore; Patricia Himes; Carmit K McMullen; Elissa Morris; Jennifer Schneider; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med Date: 2017-07-02 Impact factor: 2.183
Authors: Katherine W Saylor; Lynette Ekunwe; Donna Antoine-LaVigne; Deborah E Sellers; Sarah McGraw; Daniel Levy; Greta Lee Splansky; Steven Joffe Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 1.742
Authors: Devan M Duenas; Kelly J Shipman; Kathryn M Porter; Elizabeth Shuster; Claudia Guerra; Ana Reyes; Tia L Kauffman; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Katrina A B Goddard; Benjamin S Wilfond; Stephanie A Kraft Journal: Genet Med Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Danya F Vears; Joel T Minion; Stephanie J Roberts; James Cummings; Mavis Machirori; Mwenza Blell; Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Lorraine Cowley; Stephanie O M Dyke; Clara Gaff; Robert Green; Alison Hall; Amber L Johns; Bartha M Knoppers; Stephanie Mulrine; Christine Patch; Eva Winkler; Madeleine J Murtagh Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-11-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Priscilla A Chan; Katie L Lewis; Barbara B Biesecker; Lori H Erby; Grace-Ann Fasaye; Sandra Epps; Leslie G Biesecker; Erin Turbitt Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 2.717
Authors: Amanda M Gutierrez; Jill O Robinson; Simon M Outram; Hadley S Smith; Stephanie A Kraft; Katherine E Donohue; Barbara B Biesecker; Kyle B Brothers; Flavia Chen; Benyam Hailu; Lucia A Hindorff; Hannah Hoban; Rebecca L Hsu; Sara J Knight; Barbara A Koenig; Katie L Lewis; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Julianne M O'Daniel; Sonia Okuyama; Gail E Tomlinson; Margaret Waltz; Benjamin S Wilfond; Sara L Ackerman; Mary A Majumder Journal: J Clin Transl Sci Date: 2021-09-14
Authors: Chloe O Huelsnitz; Erin Turbitt; Jennifer M Taber; Katie L Lewis; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker; William M P Klein Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2021-05-13
Authors: Rohini Chakravarthy; Sarah C Stallings; Michael Williams; Megan Hollister; Mario Davidson; Juan Canedo; Consuelo H Wilkins Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 3.752