Literature DB >> 8231339

Measuring physicians' tolerance for ambiguity and its relationship to their reported practices regarding genetic testing.

G Geller1, E S Tambor, G A Chase, N A Holtzman.   

Abstract

Despite uncertainties in medicine, attempts to study physicians' tolerance for uncertainty have been few, and limited by the measurement instruments available. This paper describes development of a modified tolerance for ambiguity (TFA) scale, and correlates it with several physician characteristics and reported behaviors. Eighteen TFA items were included in a national survey of physicians' knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing. Sixty-five percent (n = 1,140) of 1,759 obstetricians, pediatricians, internists, family practitioners, and psychiatrists responded. After psychometric analyses, the scale was reduced to 7 items, demonstrating an acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .75). TFA was higher among psychiatrists than other specialties, among those who were older when they graduated from medical school, and among those willing to offer a new low-cost, accurate predictive test when none of their colleagues do. TFA was lower among those who indicated that attendance at religious services was important, among those who would make a recommendation to their patients regarding pregnancy termination after prenatal diagnosis, and among those who would withhold negative genetic test results. Future research is needed on the scale itself, and to assess factors affecting TFA, such as its susceptibility to modification, and its potential association with clinical practice in other areas of medicine that are characterized by ambiguity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8231339     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199311000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  55 in total

1.  The role of distress in uptake and response to predisposition genetic testing: the BMPR2 experience.

Authors:  Diana L Jones; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2011-11-15

2.  Parents' perspectives on participating in genetic research in autism.

Authors:  Magan Trottier; Wendy Roberts; Irene Drmic; Stephen W Scherer; Rosanna Weksberg; Cheryl Cytrynbaum; David Chitayat; Cheryl Shuman; Fiona A Miller
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-03

3.  Physicians' attitudes about communicating and managing scientific uncertainty differ by perceived ambiguity aversion of their patients.

Authors:  David B Portnoy; Paul K J Han; Rebecca A Ferrer; William M P Klein; Steven B Clauser
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Problem Knowledge Couplers: reengineering evidence-based medicine through interdisciplinary development, decision support, and research.

Authors:  J J McGowan; P Winstead-Fry
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1999-10

5.  Varieties of uncertainty in health care: a conceptual taxonomy.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; William M P Klein; Neeraj K Arora
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Cystic fibrosis carrier population screening in the primary care setting.

Authors:  S Loader; P Caldwell; A Kozyra; J C Levenkron; C D Boehm; H H Kazazian; P T Rowley
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Implicit bias among physicians.

Authors:  Neal V Dawson; Hal R Arkes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Perceived ambiguity as a barrier to intentions to learn genome sequencing results.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein; Rebecca A Ferrer; Paul K J Han; Katie L Lewis; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-05-24

9.  The process of deciding about prophylactic surgery for breast and ovarian cancer: Patient questions, uncertainties, and communication.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Wendy Chung
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Psychiatrists' views of the genetic bases of mental disorders and behavioral traits and their use of genetic tests.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Kristopher J Abbate; Wendy K Chung; Karen Marder; Ruth Ottman; Katherine Johansen Taber; Cheng-Shiun Leu; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.