Literature DB >> 34906471

Motivations and concerns of patients considering participation in an implementation study of a hereditary cancer risk assessment program in diverse primary care settings.

Devan M Duenas1, Kelly J Shipman2, Kathryn M Porter3, Elizabeth Shuster4, Claudia Guerra5, Ana Reyes4, Tia L Kauffman4, Jessica Ezzell Hunter4, Katrina A B Goddard6, Benjamin S Wilfond7, Stephanie A Kraft7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Understanding the motivations and concerns of patients from diverse populations regarding participation in implementation research provides the needed evidence about how to design and conduct studies for facilitating access to genetics services. Within a hereditary cancer screening study assessing a multifaceted intervention, we examined primary care patients' motivations and concerns about participation.
METHODS: We surveyed and interviewed study participants after they enrolled, surveyed those who did not complete enrollment, and used descriptive qualitative and quantitative methods to identify motivations and concerns regarding participation.
RESULTS: Survey respondents' most common motivations included a desire to learn about their future risk (81%), receiving information that may help family (58%), and a desire to advance research (34%). Interviews revealed 3 additional important factors: affordability of testing, convenience of participation, and clinical relationships supporting research decision-making. Survey data of those who declined enrollment showed that the reasons for declining included concerns about privacy (38%), burdens of the research (19%), and their fear of not being able to cope with the genetic information (19%).
CONCLUSION: Understanding the facilitating factors and concerns that contribute to decisions about research may reveal ways to improve equity in access to care and research that could lead to greater uptake of genomic medicine across diverse primary care patient populations.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Concerns; Genetics; Motivations; Primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34906471      PMCID: PMC8939763          DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  31 in total

1.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  The Chinese and Korean American immigrant experience: a mixed-methods examination of facilitators and barriers of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Mary Y Jung; Cheryl L Holt; Diane Ng; Hwa J Sim; Xiaoxiao Lu; Daisy Le; Hee-Soon Juon; Jun Li; Sunmin Lee
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Motivators for participation in a whole-genome sequencing study: implications for translational genomics research.

Authors:  Flavia M Facio; Stephanie Brooks; Johanna Loewenstein; Susannah Green; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Identifying Barriers and Facilitators to Breast Cancer Early Detection and Subsequent Treatment Engagement in Kenya: A Qualitative Approach.

Authors:  Robai Gakunga; Asaph Kinyanjui; Zipporah Ali; Emily Ochieng'; Nancy Gikaara; Florence Maluni; David Wata; Mercy Kyeng'; Anne Korir; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-10-10

5.  Attitudes Toward Risk and Informed Consent for Research on Medical Practices: A Cross-sectional Survey.

Authors:  Mildred K Cho; David Magnus; Melissa Constantine; Sandra Soo-Jin Lee; Maureen Kelley; Stephanie Alessi; Diane Korngiebel; Cyan James; Ellen Kuwana; Thomas H Gallagher; Douglas Diekema; Alexander M Capron; Steven Joffe; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Barriers of colorectal cancer screening in rural USA: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hongmei Wang; Shreya Roy; Jungyoon Kim; Paraskevi A Farazi; Mohammad Siahpush; Dejun Su
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 1.759

Review 7.  Delving below the surface. Understanding how race and ethnicity influence relationships in health care.

Authors:  Lisa A Cooper; Mary Catherine Beach; Rachel L Johnson; Thomas S Inui
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  A comparison of institutional review board professionals' and patients' views on consent for research on medical practices.

Authors:  Stephanie Alessi Kraft; Mildred K Cho; Melissa Constantine; Sandra Soo-Jin Lee; Maureen Kelley; Diane Korngiebel; Cyan James; Ellen Kuwana; Adrienne Meyer; Kathryn Porter; Douglas Diekema; Alexander M Capron; Radica Alicic; Benjamin S Wilfond; David Magnus
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Michael D Linderman; Sabrina A Suckiel; George A Diaz; Randi E Zinberg; Kadija Ferryman; Melissa Wasserstein; Andrew Kasarskis; Eric E Schadt
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Adopting genetics: motivations and outcomes of personal genomic testing in adult adoptees.

Authors:  Natalie M Baptista; Kurt D Christensen; Deanna Alexis Carere; Simon A Broadley; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.