Literature DB >> 23794263

Willingness to participate in genomics research and desire for personal results among underrepresented minority patients: a structured interview study.

Saskia C Sanderson1, Michael A Diefenbach, Randi Zinberg, Carol R Horowitz, Margaret Smirnoff, Micol Zweig, Samantha Streicher, Ethylin Wang Jabs, Lynne D Richardson.   

Abstract

Patients from traditionally underrepresented communities need to be involved in discussions around genomics research including attitudes towards participation and receiving personal results. Structured interviews, including open-ended and closed-ended questions, were conducted with 205 patients in an inner-city hospital outpatient clinic: 48 % of participants self-identified as Black or African American, 29 % Hispanic, 10 % White; 49 % had an annual household income of <$20,000. When the potential for personal results to be returned was not mentioned, 82 % of participants were willing to participate in genomics research. Reasons for willingness fell into four themes: altruism; benefit to family members; personal health benefit; personal curiosity and improving understanding. Reasons for being unwilling fell into five themes: negative perception of research; not personally relevant; negative feelings about procedures (e.g., blood draws); practical barriers; and fear of results. Participants were more likely to report that they would participate in genomics research if personal results were offered than if they were not offered (89 vs. 62 % respectively, p < 0.001). Participants were more interested in receiving personal genomic risk results for cancer, heart disease and type 2 diabetes than obesity (89, 89, 91, 80 % respectively, all p < 0.001). The only characteristic consistently associated with interest in receiving personal results was disease-specific worry. There was considerable willingness to participate in and desire for personal results from genomics research in this sample of predominantly low-income, Hispanic and African American patients. When returning results is not practical, or even when it is, alternatively or additionally providing generic information about genomics and health may also be a valuable commodity to underrepresented minority and other populations considering participating in genomics research.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23794263      PMCID: PMC3773313          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-013-0154-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  57 in total

Review 1.  Medical consequences of obesity.

Authors:  George A Bray
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Recruitment for genetic studies of epilepsy.

Authors:  Sylwia Misiewicz; Melodie R Winawer
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.045

3.  Reasons for participating and genetic information needs among racially and ethnically diverse biobank participants: a focus group study.

Authors:  Samantha A Streicher; Saskia C Sanderson; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Michael Diefenbach; Meg Smirnoff; Inga Peter; Carol R Horowitz; Barbara Brenner; Lynne D Richardson
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-06-07

4.  The effects of a genetic information leaflet on public attitudes towards genetic testing.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Jane Wardle; Susan Michie
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2005-04

5.  Race, medical researcher distrust, perceived harm, and willingness to participate in cardiovascular prevention trials.

Authors:  Joel B Braunstein; Noëlle S Sherber; Steven P Schulman; Eric L Ding; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Public interest in genetic testing for susceptibility to heart disease and cancer: a population-based survey in the UK.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Jane Wardle; Martin J Jarvis; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Potential bias in the bank: what distinguishes refusers, nonresponders and participants in a clinic-based biobank?

Authors:  J L Ridgeway; L C Han; J E Olson; K A Lackore; B A Koenig; T J Beebe; J Y Ziegenfuss
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 8.  Strategies and stakeholders: minority recruitment in cancer genetics research.

Authors:  Rosalina D James; Joon-Ho Yu; Nora B Henrikson; Deborah J Bowen; Stephanie M Fullerton
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2008-04-14

9.  Associations between anticipated reactions to genetic test results and interest in genetic testing: will self-selection reduce the potential for harm?

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2008-03

10.  Association analysis in african americans of European-derived type 2 diabetes single nucleotide polymorphisms from whole-genome association studies.

Authors:  Joshua P Lewis; Nicholette D Palmer; Pamela J Hicks; Michele M Sale; Carl D Langefeld; Barry I Freedman; Jasmin Divers; Donald W Bowden
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 9.461

View more
  30 in total

1.  Leaves imitate trees: Minnesota Hmong concepts of heredity and applications to genomics research.

Authors:  Kathleen A Culhane-Pera; MaiKia Moua; Pachia Vue; Kang Xiaaj; May Xia Lo; Robert J Straka
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-11-07

2.  Establishment of a cohort for deep phenotyping of the immune response to influenza vaccination among elderly individuals recruited from the general population.

Authors:  Manas K Akmatov; Peggy Riese; Marcus May; Leonhard Jentsch; Malik W Ahmed; Damaris Werner; Anja Rösel; Megan Tyler; Kevin Pessler; Jana Prokein; Inga Bernemann; Norman Klopp; Blair Prochnow; Stephanie Trittel; Aravind Tallam; Thomas Illig; Christoph Schindler; Carlos A Guzmán; Frank Pessler
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Participant-Centered Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Biospecimen Collection among Spanish-Speaking Latina Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Cathy Samayoa; Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson; Cristian Escalera; Anita L Stewart; Carmen Ortiz; Leticia Márquez-Magaña; Aday Urias; Nayeli Gonzalez; Silvia A Cervantes; Alma Torres-Nguyen; Lorenia Parada-Ampudia; Anna M Nápoles
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Community Perceptions of Biobanking Participation: A Qualitative Study among Mexican-Americans in Three Texas Cities.

Authors:  Natalia I Heredia; Sarah Krasny; Larkin L Strong; Laura Von Hatten; Lynne Nguyen; Belinda M Reininger; Lorna H McNeill; María E Fernández
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  The design and conduct of a community-based registry and biorepository: a focus on cardiometabolic health in Latinos.

Authors:  Gabriel Q Shaibi; Dawn K Coletta; Veronica Vital; Lawrence J Mandarino
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.689

6.  Genetic research participation in a young adult community sample.

Authors:  Carla L Storr; Flora Or; William W Eaton; Nicholas Ialongo
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-06-20

Review 7.  Toward the implementation of genomic applications for smoking cessation and smoking-related diseases.

Authors:  Alex T Ramsey; Li-Shiun Chen; Sarah M Hartz; Nancy L Saccone; Sherri L Fisher; Enola K Proctor; Laura J Bierut
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Impact of Genomic Counseling on Informed Decision-Making among ostensibly Healthy Individuals Seeking Personal Genome Sequencing: the HealthSeq Project.

Authors:  Sabrina A Suckiel; Michael D Linderman; Saskia C Sanderson; George A Diaz; Melissa Wasserstein; Andrew Kasarskis; Eric E Schadt; Randi E Zinberg
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Was it worth it? Patients' perspectives on the perceived value of genomic-based individualized medicine.

Authors:  Colin Me Halverson; Kristin E Clift; Jennifer B McCormick
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-02-09

10.  Learning from Latino voices: Focus Groups' Insights on Participation in Genetic Research.

Authors:  Priscilla Martinez; Cory Cummings; Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe; Karen G Chartier
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2017-04-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.