Literature DB >> 31068049

Attitudes Toward Genetics and Genetic Testing Among Participants in the Jackson and Framingham Heart Studies.

Katherine W Saylor1, Lynette Ekunwe2, Donna Antoine-LaVigne2, Deborah E Sellers3, Sarah McGraw4, Daniel Levy5,6, Greta Lee Splansky5, Steven Joffe7,8.   

Abstract

Genetic analysis has become integral to many large cohort studies. However, little is known about longitudinal cohort study participants' attitudes toward genetics and genetic testing. We analyzed data from a survey of participants in the Jackson Heart Study (n = 960), Framingham Heart Study (n = 955), and Framingham Heart Study-Omni Cohort (n = 160). Based on a three-question attitude scale, most participants had positive attitudes toward genetic testing (median score = 4.3-5/5). Participants were also asked to select words to describe their attitudes toward genetics. More respondents endorsed the positive words "hopeful" (60%-70%), "optimistic" (44%-64%), "enthusiastic" (35%-43%), or "excited" (28%-30%) than the negative words "cautious" (35%-38%), "concerned" (25%-55%), "worried" (6%-13%), "pessimistic" (2%-5%), or "horrified" (1%-5%). Characteristics associated with favorable attitudes were greater genetics knowledge, higher subjective numeracy, experience with genetic testing, less frequent religious attendance, and not being employed. These findings demonstrate variation in attitudes even among participants in long-standing cohort studies, indicating a need for ongoing participant engagement and education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Framingham Heart Study; Jackson Heart Study; attitudes; genetics; research participants

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31068049      PMCID: PMC6565476          DOI: 10.1177/1556264619844851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  34 in total

1.  The Genetic Knowledge Index: developing a standard measure of genetic knowledge.

Authors:  L A Furr; S E Kelly
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  1999

2.  Genetic information leaflets: influencing attitudes towards genetic testing.

Authors:  Susan Michie; Elena di Lorenzo; Ruth Lane; Kevin Armstrong; Saskia Sanderson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  Recruiting African-American research participation in the Jackson Heart Study: methods, response rates, and sample description.

Authors:  Sonja R Fuqua; Sharon B Wyatt; Michael E Andrew; Daniel F Sarpong; Frances R Henderson; Margie F Cunningham; Herman A Taylor
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.847

4.  The association between knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing for cancer risk in the United States.

Authors:  Abigail Rose; Nikki Peters; Judy A Shea; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2005-06

5.  Public attitudes towards genetic testing revisited: comparing opinions between 2002 and 2010.

Authors:  Lidewij Henneman; Eric Vermeulen; Carla G van El; Liesbeth Claassen; Danielle R M Timmermans; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Attitude and knowledge about genetics and genetic testing.

Authors:  H Etchegary; M Cappelli; B Potter; M Vloet; I Graham; M Walker; B Wilson
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  A community-driven model of research participation: the Jackson Heart Study Participant Recruitment and Retention Study.

Authors:  Sharon B Wyatt; Nancy Diekelmann; Frances Henderson; Michael E Andrew; Gloria Billingsley; Sherry H Felder; Sonja Fuqua; Priscilla B Jackson
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.847

8.  Public attitudes towards preventive genomics and personal interest in genetic testing to prevent disease: a survey study.

Authors:  Eric Vermeulen; Lidewij Henneman; Carla G van El; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.367

9.  A Survey of U.S Adults' Opinions about Conduct of a Nationwide Precision Medicine Initiative® Cohort Study of Genes and Environment.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Rebecca Baker; Lauren C Milner; Stephanie Devaney; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Age and perceived risks and benefits of preventive genomic screening.

Authors:  Margaret Waltz; R Jean Cadigan; Anya E R Prince; Debra Skinner; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  3 in total

1.  Perspectives and preferences regarding genomic secondary findings in underrepresented prenatal and pediatric populations: A mixed-methods approach.

Authors:  Shannon Rego; Hannah Hoban; Simon Outram; Astrid N Zamora; Flavia Chen; Nuriye Sahin-Hodoglugil; Beatriz Anguiano; Matthew Norstad; Tiffany Yip; Billie Lianoglou; Teresa N Sparks; Mary E Norton; Barbara A Koenig; Anne M Slavotinek; Sara L Ackerman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 8.864

2.  Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes Concerning Genetic Testing Among Young Jordanians.

Authors:  Zaid Altaany; Omar F Khabour; Ghaith Al-Taani
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2019-12-11

Review 3.  Mini-Review: Genetic Literacy and Engagement With Genetic Testing for Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  India D Little; Chris Gunter
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.599

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.