Literature DB >> 12915277

The use of degrees of certainty to evaluate knowledge.

Daniela Bruttomesso1, Rémi Gagnayre, Dieudonné Leclercq, Dalia Crazzolara, Erica Busata, Jean-François d'Ivernois, Edoardo Casiglia, Antonio Tiengo, Aldo Baritussio.   

Abstract

In patients with chronic diseases education should improve knowledge about the disease and increase certainty in knowledge. We present here a technique to measure changes in certainty after an educational intervention. For this purpose, before and after a course, patients answer a questionnaire in which answers are accompanied by an estimate of the degree of certainty. Answers are then assigned to areas of knowledge defined a priori: mastered (certainty > or = 90%, correctness > or = 90%), hazardous (certainty > or = 90%, correctness < or = 50%), uncertain (certainty < or = 50%, correctness > or = 90%) and residual. Finally differences in the distribution of answers among different areas are analysed statistically. Using this technique in a group of patients with type I diabetes who followed a course on insulin use, we found significant changes in the distribution of answers among different areas of knowledge. Thus changes in certainty can be analysed quantitatively and used to evaluate better the effect of therapeutic education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12915277     DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00226-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  5 in total

1.  Helping GPs to extrapolate guideline recommendations to patients for whom there are no explicit recommendations, through the visualization of drug properties. The example of AntibioHelp® in bacterial diseases.

Authors:  Rosy Tsopra; Karima Sedki; Mélanie Courtine; Hector Falcoff; Antoine De Beco; Ronni Madar; Frédéric Mechaï; Jean-Baptiste Lamy
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Study protocol: Randomised controlled trial to evaluate the impact of an educational programme on Alzheimer's disease patients' quality of life.

Authors:  Hélène Villars; Virginie Gardette; Amélie Perrin; Christophe Hein; Sophie Elmalem; Eva de Peretti; Audrey Zueras; Bruno Vellas; Fati Nourhashémi
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 6.982

3.  Immunomodulatory drugs in multiple myeloma: Impact of the SCARMET (Self CARe and MEdication Toxicity) educational intervention on outpatients' knowledge to manage adverse effects.

Authors:  Juliette Périchou; Florence Ranchon; Chloé Herledan; Laure Huot; Virginie Larbre; Isabelle Carpentier; Anne Lazareth; Lionel Karlin; Karen Beny; Nicolas Vantard; Vérane Schwiertz; Anne Gaelle Caffin; Amandine Baudouin; Pierre Sesques; Gabriel Brisou; Hervé Ghesquières; Gilles Salles; Catherine Rioufol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Increasing Parental Knowledge About Child Feeding: Evaluation of the Effect of Public Health Policy Communication Media in France.

Authors:  Sofia De Rosso; Pauline Ducrot; Claire Chabanet; Sophie Nicklaus; Camille Schwartz
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-02-24

5.  Knowledge, motivations, expectations, and traits of an African, African-American, and Afro-Caribbean sequencing cohort and comparisons to the original ClinSeq® cohort.

Authors:  Katie L Lewis; Alexis R Heidlebaugh; Sandra Epps; Paul K J Han; Kristen P Fishler; William M P Klein; Ilana M Miller; David Ng; Charlotte Hepler; Barbara B Biesecker; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 8.822

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.