Literature DB >> 21726577

Feasibility and efficacy of pairing fecal immunochemical testing with mammography for increasing colorectal cancer screening among uninsured Latinas in northern Manhattan.

Grace Clarke Hillyer1, Charles E Basch, Karen M Schmitt, Alfred I Neugut.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of a program to promote colorectal cancer screening (CRC) among uninsured Latinas receiving mammography through a cancer screening clinic in northern Manhattan.
METHODS: Between August 2009 and March 2010, unscreened, average CRC risk, uninsured Latinas, aged 50-64 years, undergoing mammography received a screening recommendation, education, and fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Socio-demographic information and level of acculturation was collected. Screening compliance was assessed.
RESULTS: Of 651 Latinas evaluated, 210 were eligible and, of these, 94% (n=197) consented to participate; 441 were excluded because they were up-to-date with CRC screening (n=130), < 50 (n=285) or >64 (n=26) years of age. After intervention, 177 (90%) completed FIT. Within 2 weeks, 87% completed the FIT, and 69% did so with no reminder calls. Acculturation was significantly lower among screeners (p=0.014). Compared with non-screeners, screeners were more likely to be foreign-born (p=0.009), to speak only Spanish (p=0.043), and to prefer to read (p=0.037), and think (p=0.015) in Spanish.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that pairing CRC education and screening with mammography is both feasible and efficacious.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21726577     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  5 in total

1.  Geographic and population-level disparities in colorectal cancer testing: A multilevel analysis of Medicaid and commercial claims data.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Stephanie Renfro; Robyn Pham; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Jackilen Shannon; Gloria D Coronado; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Fecal-based colorectal cancer screening among the uninsured in northern Manhattan.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Karen M Schmitt; Daniel E Freedberg; Rachel A Kramer; Yin Su; Richard M Rosenberg; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Examining the Impact of Latino Nativity, Migration, and Acculturation Factors on Colonoscopy Screening.

Authors:  Rosario Costas-Muñiz; Lina Jandorf; Errol Philip; Noah Cohen; Cristina Villagra; Pathu Sriphanlop; Elizabeth Schofield; Katherine DuHamel
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-10

4.  Effectiveness and cost of multilayered colorectal cancer screening promotion interventions at federally qualified health centers in Washington State.

Authors:  Kathryn E Kemper; Becky L Glaze; Casey L Eastman; Roxane C Waldron; Sonja Hoover; T'Ronda Flagg; Florence K L Tangka; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Primary care colorectal cancer screening correlates with breast cancer screening: implications for colorectal cancer screening improvement interventions.

Authors:  Jennifer M Weiss; Nancy Pandhi; Sally Kraft; Aaron Potvien; Pascale Carayon; Maureen A Smith
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.488

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.