Literature DB >> 26362405

Outreach for Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Budget Impact Analysis for Community Health Centers.

David T Liss1, Dustin D French2, David R Buchanan3, Tiffany Brown4, Bridget G Magner3, Stephanie Kollar3, David W Baker4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is an attractive approach for colorectal cancer screening at community health centers. This budget impact analysis investigated benefits and costs of FIT outreach-with FIT kits mailed to patients, followed by reminders and phone calls-compared with point-of-care (POC) strategies.
METHODS: Five screening and cost outcomes were simulated over 1 year at a "base case" community health center serving 1000 screening-eligible patients: (1) FIT completion among patients due for screening; (2) proportion up-to-date on screening; (3) cost per patient due for screening; (4) cost per completed FIT; and (5) total organizational cost. Uncertainty analysis investigated potential savings from optimizing staff workflows during FIT outreach. Data were collected in 2012-2014, with analysis conducted 2014-2015.
RESULTS: Using POC strategies, 24.0% of patients due for screening completed FIT, versus 42.4% under outreach (18.4% absolute difference). When calculations included patients up-to-date on screening from prior colonoscopy, 41.7% were up-to-date via POC, versus 55.8% for outreach (14.1% absolute difference). POC cost $4.93 per patient, versus $30.43 for outreach ($25.50 difference). Cost per patient screened was $20.60 for POC and $71.84 for outreach ($51.24 difference). Total organizational cost was $3,779 for POC distribution and $23,315 for outreach ($19,536 difference). Outreach costs decreased by approximately one fourth under optimized workflows.
CONCLUSIONS: Outreach is an effective, practical, relatively low-cost strategy; costs could be reduced further by optimizing staff workflows. Despite its value, outreach costs more than POC distribution and may be difficult for community health centers to implement under current payment models.
Copyright © 2016 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26362405     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  11 in total

1.  Effect of Combined Patient Decision Aid and Patient Navigation vs Usual Care for Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Vulnerable Patient Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Daniel S Reuland; Alison T Brenner; Richard Hoffman; Andrew McWilliams; Robert L Rhyne; Christina Getrich; Hazel Tapp; Mark A Weaver; Danelle Callan; Laura Cubillos; Brisa Urquieta de Hernandez; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Effectiveness and Cost of Organized Outreach for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ma Somsouk; Carly Rachocki; Ajitha Mannalithara; Dianne Garcia; Victoria Laleau; Barbara Grimes; Rachel B Issaka; Ellen Chen; Eric Vittinghoff; Jean A Shapiro; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Effectiveness and cost of multilayered colorectal cancer screening promotion interventions at federally qualified health centers in Washington State.

Authors:  Kathryn E Kemper; Becky L Glaze; Casey L Eastman; Roxane C Waldron; Sonja Hoover; T'Ronda Flagg; Florence K L Tangka; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Colorectal cancer screening interventions in 2 health care systems serving disadvantaged populations: Screening uptake and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Christen L Lara; Kelly L Means; Krystal D Morwood; Westley R Lighthall; Sonja Hoover; Florence K L Tangka; Cynthia French; Krystal D Gayle; Amy DeGroff; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Economics of Multicomponent Interventions to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Community Guide Systematic Review.

Authors:  Giridhar Mohan; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Donatus U Ekwueme; Susan A Sabatino; Devon L Okasako-Schmucker; Yinan Peng; Shawna L Mercer; Anilkrishna B Thota
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 6.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of a colorectal cancer screening program in safety net clinics.

Authors:  Richard T Meenan; Gloria D Coronado; Amanda Petrik; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Factors Influencing Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Improvement Program in Community Health Centers: an Applied Use of Configurational Comparative Methods.

Authors:  Amanda F Petrik; Beverly Green; Jennifer Schneider; Edward J Miech; Jennifer Coury; Sally Retecki; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Cost and Effectiveness of Reminders to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Rural Federally Qualified Health Centers in West Virginia.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Conn; Stephenie Kennedy-Rea; Sujha Subramanian; Adam Baus; Sonja Hoover; Cheryl Cunningham; Florence K L Tangka
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2020-09-29

9.  Examining the Effectiveness of Provider Incentives to Increase CRC Screening Uptake in Neighborhood Healthcare: A California Federally Qualified Health Center.

Authors:  Melissa Barajas; Florence K L Tangka; James Schultz; Kulin Tantod; Ying Marilyn Kempster; Ndukaku Omelu; Sonja Hoover; Melonie Thomas; Valerie Richmond-Reese; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2020-09-29

10.  Clinical and Budget Impact of Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening by Blood- and Stool-Based Testing.

Authors:  Joshua A Roth; Theo deVos; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2019-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.