Literature DB >> 25729454

Reasons for non-response to a direct-mailed FIT kit program: lessons learned from a pragmatic colorectal-cancer screening study in a federally sponsored health center.

Gloria D Coronado1, Jennifer L Schneider1, Jennifer J Sanchez1, Amanda F Petrik1, Beverly Green2.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer screening rates are below optimal. As part of a pilot clinic-based pragmatic study aiming to raise rates of colorectal-cancer screening, we explored patients' reasons for not responding to a direct-mailed screening invitation. We conducted telephone interviews with patients who were mailed a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) but who did not return it to the lab. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded for thematic analysis. We met our goal of 20 interviews (10 in English and 10 Spanish; 75 % female). Reasons for not completing tests were fear of results or cost of follow-up colonoscopy (n = 9); not having received the test in the mail (n = 7); concerns about mailing fecal matter or that test results could be mixed up (n = 6); and being busy or forgetful (n = 4). Efforts to improve uptake of colorectal cancer screening in a direct-mailed program ought to address concerns identified in our study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer screening; Direct-mailed fecal testing; Federally qualified health centers; Implementation; Pragmatic research; Qualitative interviews

Year:  2015        PMID: 25729454      PMCID: PMC4332898          DOI: 10.1007/s13142-014-0276-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  26 in total

1.  Cancer screening - United States, 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Cultivating engaged leadership through a learning collaborative: lessons from primary care renewal in Oregon safety net clinics.

Authors:  Carmit K McMullen; Jennifer Schneider; Alison Firemark; James Davis; Mark Spofford
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Primary care colorectal cancer screening recommendation patterns: associated factors and screening outcomes.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; Elizabeth G Liles; David H Smith; Ana G Rosales; Jennifer L Schneider; Jennifer E Lafata; Ronald E Myers; David M Mosen; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Physician and staff perceptions of barriers to colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Clarenda M Phillips; Crystal Jenkins; Gretchen Norling; Carol White; Todd Jenkins; Debra Armstrong; Joe Petrik; Amy Steinkuhl; Regina Washington; Mark Dignan
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.302

5.  Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening among Mid-Atlantic Latinos: focus group findings.

Authors:  Michelle J Goodman; Alexis Ogdie; Mariano J Kanamori; Janet Cañar; Ann S O'Malley
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.847

6.  Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Alan M Zaslavsky; Richard Marshall; Robert H Fletcher; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-23

7.  What affects the uptake of screening for bowel cancer using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt): a qualitative study.

Authors:  Alison Chapple; Sue Ziebland; Paul Hewitson; Ann McPherson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Self-sampling in screening to reduce mortality from colorectal cancer: a qualitative exploration of the decision to complete a faecal occult blood test (FOBT).

Authors:  I O'Sullivan; S Orbell
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.136

9.  Health care worker perspectives inform optimization of patient panel-support tools: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Jennifer L Schneider; Robert Unitan; Nancy A Perrin; David H Smith; Gregory A Nichols; Nancy L Lee
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.459

10.  Attitudes and beliefs about colorectal cancer among Mexican Americans in communities along the US-Mexico border.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Argelia Farias; Beti Thompson; Ruby Godina; Wendell Oderkirk
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.847

View more
  18 in total

1.  Timeliness of Colonoscopy After Abnormal Fecal Test Results in a Safety Net Practice.

Authors:  Ann Oluloro; Amanda F Petrik; Ann Turner; Tanya Kapka; Jennifer Rivelli; Patricia A Carney; Somnath Saha; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-08

2.  Low Literacy Level Instructions and Reminder Calls Improve Patient Handling of Fecal Immunochemical Test Samples.

Authors:  Andrew Wang; Carly Rachocki; Jean A Shapiro; Rachel B Issaka; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  'Simple and easy:' providers' and latinos' perceptions of the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Claudia X Aguado Loi; Dinorah Martinez Tyson; Enmanuel A Chavarria; Liliana Gutierrez; Lynne Klasko; Stacy Davis; Diana Lopez; Tracy Johns; Cathy D Meade; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Two Medicaid health plans' models and motivations for improving colorectal cancer screening rates.

Authors:  Jennifer K Coury; Jennifer L Schneider; Beverly B Green; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Amanda F Petrik; Jennifer S Rivelli; Malaika R Schwartz; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Effect of a Digital Health Intervention on Decreasing Barriers and Increasing Facilitators for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Vulnerable Patients.

Authors:  Nancy M Denizard-Thompson; David P Miller; Anna C Snavely; John G Spangler; L Doug Case; Kathryn E Weaver
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Jennifer L Schneider; Amanda F Petrik; Edward J Miech; Brittany Younger; Anne L Escaron; Jennifer S Rivelli; Jamie H Thompson; Denis Nyongesa; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Effectiveness and cost of multilayered colorectal cancer screening promotion interventions at federally qualified health centers in Washington State.

Authors:  Kathryn E Kemper; Becky L Glaze; Casey L Eastman; Roxane C Waldron; Sonja Hoover; T'Ronda Flagg; Florence K L Tangka; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  A qualitative study of patient preferences for prompts and reminders for a direct-mail fecal testing program.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Jennifer L Schneider; Rose Gunn; Jennifer S Rivelli; Katherine A Vaughn; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Factors Influencing Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Improvement Program in Community Health Centers: an Applied Use of Configurational Comparative Methods.

Authors:  Amanda F Petrik; Beverly Green; Jennifer Schneider; Edward J Miech; Jennifer Coury; Sally Retecki; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Population health interventions to improve colorectal cancer screening by fecal immunochemical tests: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Patrick Avila; Evans Whitaker; Stephen Bent; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.