Literature DB >> 32083287

A qualitative study of patient preferences for prompts and reminders for a direct-mail fecal testing program.

Melinda M Davis1, Jennifer L Schneider2, Rose Gunn3, Jennifer S Rivelli2, Katherine A Vaughn2, Gloria D Coronado2.   

Abstract

Programs that directly mail fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) to patients can increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, especially in low-income and Latino populations. Few studies have explored patient reactions to prompts or reminders that accompany such programs. As part of the Participatory Research to Advance Colon Cancer Prevention pilot study, which tested prompts and reminders to a direct-mail FIT program in a large, urban health center, we conducted telephone interviews among English- and Spanish-speaking participants who were assigned to receive a series of text message prompts, automated phone call reminders, and/or live phone call reminders. We analyzed interviews using a qualitative content analysis approach. We interviewed 41 participants, including 25 responders (61%) and 16 nonresponders (39%) to the direct-mail program. Participants appreciated program ease and convenience. Few participants recalled receiving prompts or automated/live reminders; nevertheless, the vast majority (95%, n = 39) thought reminders were acceptable and helpful and suggested that 2-3 reminders delivered starting 1 week after the mailed FIT would optimally encourage completion. Prompts and reminders used with mailed-FIT programs are accepted by patients, and my help boost response rates. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Behavioral Medicine 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer screening; Direct-mailed fecal testing; Federally qualified health centers; Primary care; Qualitative research

Year:  2021        PMID: 32083287      PMCID: PMC7963281          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  36 in total

1.  Qualitative content analysis: a guide to paths not taken.

Authors:  D L Morgan
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  1993-02

2.  "Finding the Right FIT": Rural Patient Preferences for Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Characteristics.

Authors:  Robyn Pham; Suzanne Cross; Bianca Fernandez; Kathryn Corson; Kristen Dillon; Coco Yackley; Melinda M Davis
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 3.  Characteristics of Effective Colorectal Cancer Screening Navigation Programs in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jermy-Leigh B Domingo; Kathryn L Braun
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2017

4.  Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Study.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Jamie H Thompson; Amanda F Petrik; Denis B Nyongesa; Michael C Leo; Melissa Castillo; Brittany Younger; Anne Escaron; Alex Chen
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

5.  A conceptual framework and metrics for evaluating multicomponent interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening within an organized screening program.

Authors:  Sujha Subramanian; Sonja Hoover; Florence K L Tangka; Amy DeGroff; Cynthia S Soloe; Laura C Arena; Dara F Schlueter; Djenaba A Joseph; Faye L Wong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Patients' perceptions of colorectal cancer screening tests and preparatory education in federally qualified health centers.

Authors:  Clement K Gwede; Alexis M Koskan; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Stacy N Davis; Jamila Ealey; Rania Abdulla; Susan T Vadaparampil; Gloria Elliott; Diana Lopez; David Shibata; Richard G Roetzheim; Cathy D Meade
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 7.  Colorectal cancer disparities beyond biology: Screening, treatment, access.

Authors:  Casey L Daniel; Kelly Gilreath; Danielle Keyes
Journal:  Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)       Date:  2017-01-01

Review 8.  Interventions to Improve Follow-up of Positive Results on Fecal Blood Tests: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kevin Selby; Christine Baumgartner; Theodore R Levin; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Joanne Schottinger; Christopher D Jensen; Jeffrey K Lee; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Patient Navigation for Colonoscopy Completion: Results of an RCT.

Authors:  Amy DeGroff; Paul C Schroy; Kerry Grace Morrissey; Beth Slotman; Elizabeth A Rohan; James Bethel; Jennifer Murillo; Weijia Ren; Shelley Niwa; Steven Leadbetter; Djenaba Joseph
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 10.  A learning community approach to identifying interventions in health systems to reduce colorectal cancer screening disparities.

Authors:  Lillian C Man; Melissa DiCarlo; Emily Lambert; Randa Sifri; Martha Romney; Linda Fleisher; Ronald Myers
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-10-17
View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Jennifer L Schneider; Amanda F Petrik; Edward J Miech; Brittany Younger; Anne L Escaron; Jennifer S Rivelli; Jamie H Thompson; Denis Nyongesa; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.