| Literature DB >> 30353069 |
Fei Liu1,2, Meichun Xiang3, Yanlei Guo2, Xiaoli Wu2, Guangxin Lu4, Yong Yang2, Xingzhong Liu3, Shijiang Chen2, Guozhen Zhang1, Wangpeng Shi5.
Abstract
Isaria farinosa is a pathogen ofEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30353069 PMCID: PMC6199337 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33965-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Effect of bottling capacity on the mycelial growth of Isaria farinosa.
| Bottling capacity (mL) | Mycelial dry weight (g L−1)* |
|---|---|
| 50/250 mL | 7.28 ± 0.28 a |
| 100/250 mL | 5.96 ± 0.14 b |
| 150/250 mL | 5.59 ± 0.37 b |
| 200/250 mL | 3.48 ± 0.71 c |
| 100/500 mL | 5.90 ± 0.24 b |
*Mean ± SE. Values followed by the same letters within a column do not differ significantly (ANOVA, P = 0.05).
Effect of inoculum concentration on the mycelial growth of Isaria farinosa.
| Inoculum concentration (%, v v−1) | Mycelial dry weight (g L−1)* |
|---|---|
| 2 | 6.25 ± 0.46 b |
| 5 | 6.90 ± 0.70 b |
| 10 | 7.91 ± 2.06 ab |
| 15 | 7.55 ± 0.37 ab |
| 20 | 9.28 ± 0.92 a |
*Mean ± SE. Values followed by the same letters within a column do not differ significantly (ANOVA, P = 0.05).
Effect of rotation speed on the mycelial growth of Isaria farinosa.
| Rotation speed (rpm) | Mycelial dry weight (g L−1)* |
|---|---|
| 0 | 2.14 ± 0.54 b |
| 100 | 7.33 ± 2.22 a |
| 120 | 7.95 ± 2.22 a |
| 150 | 7.32 ± 0.47 a |
| 180 | 6.97 ± 0.58 a |
*Mean ± SE. Values followed by the same letters within a column do not differ significantly (ANOVA, P = 0.05).
Effect of illumination on the mycelial growth of Isaria farinosa.
| Illumination | Mycelial dry weight (g L−1)* |
|---|---|
| 12 h of light/12 h of darkness | 5.96 ± 0.28 a |
| 24 h of light | 5.74 ± 0.49 a |
| 24 h of darkness | 6.00 ± 0.41 a |
*Mean ± SE. Values followed by the same letters within a column do not differ significantly (ANOVA, P = 0.05).
Effect of temperature on the mycelial growth of Isaria farinosa.
| Temperature (°C) | Growth rate 5 d later (mm/d)* | Mycelial dry weight 5 d later (g L−1)* |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 d | — |
| 5 | 0.93 ± 0.08 b | — |
| 10 | 1.28 ± 0.12 b | — |
| 15 | 1.82 ± 0.16 a | 5.87 ± 0.19 a |
| 20 | 2.25 ± 0.18 a | 5.92 ± 0.08 a |
| 25 | 2.10 ± 0.78 a | 5.83 ± 0.06 a |
| 30 | 1.10 ± 0.1 b | — |
| 35 | 0 c | — |
*Mean ± SE. Values followed by the same letters within a column do not differ significantly (ANOVA, P = 0.05).
—No experiment to verify.
Effect of carbon source on the mycelial growth of Isaria farinosa.
| Carbon source | Mycelial dry weight (g L−1)* | |
|---|---|---|
| Monosaccharides | D-(+)-Galactose | 3.45 ± 0.41 a |
| D-(−)-Fructose | 3.43 ± 0.49 a | |
| D-(+)-Glucose | 2.79 ± 0.11 abc | |
| D-(+)-Xylose | 1.78 ± 0.40 d | |
| D-(+)-Trehalose | 3.13 ± 0.23 ab | |
| Mannose | 2.50 ± 0.96 bc | |
| D-(−)-Ribose | 2.24 ± 0.22 cd | |
| L-(−)-Sorbose | 1.74 ± 0.16 d | |
| Disaccharides | D-(+)-Cellobiose | 3.06 ± 0.27 ab |
| Maltose | 2.66 ± 0.09 bc | |
| Sucrose | 2.99 ± 0.59 abc | |
| Polysaccharides | Soluble starch | 3.19 ± 0.26 ab |
| Cellulose | ND | |
| Alditols | D-Mannitol | 2.55 ± 0.65 bc |
| Glucitol | 0.20 ± 0.11 e | |
| Control | 0.11 ± 0.14 e | |
| Organic acid | Citric acid | 0.10 ± 0.17 e |
*Mean ± SE. Values followed by the same letters within a column do not differ significantly (ANOVA, P = 0.05).
Effect of nitrogen source on the mycelial growth of Isaria farinosa.
| Nitrogen source | Mycelial dry weight (g L−1)* | |
|---|---|---|
| Inorganic nitrogen | Ammonium nitrate | 0.90 ± 0.07 ef |
| Sodium Nitrate | 1.38 ± 0.66 def | |
| Urea | 2.43 ± 0.49 bcd | |
| Amino acids | L-Cysteine | 3.20 ± 0.04 b |
| DL-Glutamic acid | 2.83 ± 0.51 bc | |
| L-Arginine | 2.70 ± 0.82 bcd | |
| Asparagine | 2.33 ± 0.18 bcd | |
| DL-Serine | 2.30 ± 0.12 bcd | |
| L-Proline | 1.78 ± 0.03 cde | |
| L-Phenylalanine | 1.76 ± 0.42 cde | |
| DL-Threonine | 1.69 ± 0.14 cde | |
| Methionine | 1.60 ± 0.26 cde | |
| L-Lysine | 1.41 ± 0.27 def | |
| Glycine | 0.72 ± 0.05 ef | |
| L-Histidine | 0.63 ± 0.07 ef | |
| L-Aspartic acid | 0.63 ± 0.95 ef | |
| Complex organic nitrogen | Yeast powder | 6.23 ± 0.55 a |
| Peptone | 6.10 ± 2.72 a | |
| Beef extract | 5.49 ± 0.38 a | |
| Controls | Control 1 | 0.76 ± 0.36 ef |
| Control 2 | 0.15 ± 0.08 f | |
*Mean ± SE. Values followed by the same letters within a column do not differ significantly (ANOVA, P = 0.05).
Effect of C/N ratio on the mycelial growth of Isaria farinosa.
| C/N ratio | D-(+)-glucose (g L−1) | C%α | beef extract (g L−1) | N%β | Total organic matter (g L−1)γ | Mycelial dry weight (g L−1)δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1:1 | 3.25 | 11.13 | 8.45 | 11.13 | 11.70 | 4.08 ± 0.06 a |
| 7:1 | 8.54 | 29.18 | 3.17 | 4.17 | 11.70 | 3.71 ± 0.21 a |
| 14:1 | 9.87 | 33.74 | 1.83 | 2.41 | 11.70 | 3.22 ± 0.19 b |
| 21:1 | 10.41 | 35.60 | 1.28 | 1.68 | 11.70 | 2.61 ± 0.12 c |
| 28:1 | 10.71 | 36.61 | 0.99 | 1.31 | 11.70 | 2.02 ± 0.17 de |
| 42:1 | 11.02 | 37.67 | 0.68 | 0.90 | 11.70 | 1.92 ± 0.35 de |
| 56:1 | 11.18 | 38.23 | 0.52 | 0.68 | 11.70 | 2.15 ± 0.39 d |
| 70:1 | 11.28 | 38.57 | 0.42 | 0.55 | 11.70 | 1.71 ± 0.10 e |
αThe carbon content of D-(+)-glucose was 40% based on the chemical formula of C6H12O6. C% equals the amount of D-(+)-glucose (g L−1) × 40%/total organic matter.
βThe nitrogen content of the beef extract was determined as 15.41% by the Kjeldahl method. N% equals the amount of beef extract (g L−1) × 15.41%/total organic matter.
γTotal organic matter represents the total dry weight (g) of D-(+)-glucose and beef extract in 1 L of medium.
δMean ± SE. Values followed by the same letters within a column do not differ significantly (ANOVA, P = 0.05).
Effects of macro-element on the mycelial growth of Isaria farinosa.
| Macro-element | Mycelial dry weight (g L−1)* |
|---|---|
| Control 1 (Complete medium) | 2.92 ± 0.35 a |
| Control 2 (No macro-elements) | 1.15 ± 0.16 c |
| Complete medium without potassium | 2.86 ± 0.25 a |
| Complete medium without sodium | 3.00 ± 0.26 a |
| Complete medium without magnesium | 2.22 ± 0.05 b |
| Complete medium without calcium | 2.60 ± 0.30 ab |
*Mean ± SE. Values followed by the same letters within a column do not differ significantly (ANOVA, P = 0.05).
Effects of trace element on the mycelial growth of Isaria farinosa.
| Trace element | Mycelial dry weight (g L−1)* |
|---|---|
| Control 1 (Complete medium) | 1.56 ± 0.19 ab |
| Control 2 (No trace elements) | 1.15 ± 0.16 c |
| Complete medium without copper | 1.87 ± 0.38 a |
| Complete medium without iron | 1.24 ± 0.14 bc |
| Complete medium without zinc | 1.28 ± 0.10 bc |
| Complete medium without manganese | 1.25 ± 0.06 bc |
*Mean ± SE. Values followed by the same letters within a column do not differ significantly (ANOVA, P = 0.05).
L8(27) orthogonal experiment.
| Run | A | B | A × B | C | A × C | B × C | D | Mycelial weight (g L−1)* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.84 ± 0.21 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4.04 ± 0.49 |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5.04 ± 0.15 |
| 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5.30 ± 0.17 |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4.16 ± 0.17 |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3.93 ± 0.86 |
| 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5.23 ± 1.22 |
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5.18 ± 0.35 |
| K1 | 4.56 | 3.99 | 4.57 | 4.57 | 4.50 | 4.62 | 4.58 | |
| K2 | 4.63 | 5.19 | 4.61 | 4.61 | 4.68 | 4.56 | 4.61 | |
| R | 0.07 | 1.20 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.06 | 0.03 |
A, B, C, D are D-(+)-glucose, beef extract, VB1, and experimental error, respectively.
A × B, A × C and B × C represent the interactions between the factors D-(+)-glucose and beef extract, D-(+)-glucose and VB1, and beef extract and VB1, respectively.
*Values are the mean ± SE of triplicate determinations.
K1 and K2 are the mean value of level 1 and level 2, respectively.
R is the maximum of K1 and K2 minus the minimum of K1 and K2, respectively.
Variance analysis of the L8(27) orthogonal experiment on the optimisation of the culture medium.
| Variance source | Sum of squaresα | F-ratio | Significance levelβ |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-(+)-glucose | 0.01 | 5.00 | |
| Beef extract | 2.86 | 1428.00 | *γ |
| D-(+)-glucose × Beef extract | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| VB1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | |
| D-(+)-glucose × VB1 | 0.07 | 34.00 | |
| Beef extract × VB1 | 0.01 | 3.50 | |
| Experimental error | 0.00 |
αThe degree of freedom in this experiment was 1, and the mean square of each factor was the same as the sum of squares.
βF0.05 (1, 1) = 161, F0.01 (1, 1) = 4052.
γF-ratio > F0.05
Figure 1Score plots obtained from the non-targeted Q-TOF/MS analysis. (A) Qualitative profiling of the LA and the HA was conducted through PCA. Their metabolic patterns showed apparent separation. (B) Score plots of PLS-DA in the UPLC and positive ESI ion mode. Their metabolic patterns were fully discriminated from one another (R2Y = 0.98; Q2 = 0.95). The X-axis and Y-axis represent the two highest X-scores of dimensions 1 and 2 for matrix X of the mass ion abundances, respectively (black squares: LA; red circles: HA).
Metabolites showing statistically significant differences between HA and LA.
| Name of metabolite | Class | Quantitative ion (m/z) | Retention time (min) | Tα |
| VIP γ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| L-phenylalanine | Amino acid | 166.0872 | 2.655153 | −11.76 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| Pantothenic acid | Amino acid | 220.1185 | 2.733965 | −12.69 | 0.00 | 1.63 |
| L-leucine | Amino acid | 132.1027 | 2.002348 | −12.74 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Iminoaspartic acid | Amino acid | 149.0611 | 2.657355 | −7.81 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
|
| ||||||
| LPC | Fatty acid esters | 518.3328 | 9.181081 | 12.84 | 0.00 | 1.68 |
| Ganolucidic acid C | Fatty acid | 519.3334 | 9.166005 | 11.18 | 0.00 | 1.64 |
| Deterrol stearate | Prenol lipid | 496.4194 | 10.56405 | −8.47 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| LPE | Glycerophospholipid | 476.2734 | 9.506074 | 7.52 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| (S)-ureidoglycolic acid | Organic acid | 152.0587 | 1.889026 | 6.70 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Xanthurenic acid | Organic acid | 223.0645 | 7.879964 | −6.97 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
|
| ||||||
| Uridine 5′-diphosphate | Nucleoside | 405.0087 | 2.33118 | −11.19 | 0.00 | 1.59 |
| S-adenosylhomocys-teine | Nucleoside | 385.1298 | 4.039654 | −12.12 | 0.00 | 1.57 |
αRelative concentrations compared with LA: T > 0 indicates upregulated; T < 0 indicates downregulated.
βP value determined using Student’s t test.
γCorrelation coefficient and VIP values were obtained from orthogonal projection to the latent structures discriminant analysis.
Figure 2Metabolite profiles obtained from the quantitative analysis of the subjects. The figure was obtained using GraphPad Prism, and the names of metabolites are shown in the box plot. The box plot consists of the median (horizontal line) and the inter-quartile range, and the whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum values unless there were outliers, in which case the whiskers extend to a maximum of 1.5 times the inter-quartile range. The differences in LPC, ganolucidic acid C, LPE and (S)-ureidoglycolic acid between the LA and HA are displayed. “*” indicates P < 0.01.
Figure 3Metabolite profiles obtained from the quantitative analysis of the subjects. The figure was obtained in the same manner as Fig. 2. The differences in iminoaspartic acid, pantothenic acid, L-phenylalanine, L-leucine, deterrol stearate, xanthurenic acid, uridine 5′-diphosphate, and S-adenosylhomocysteine between the LA and HA are displayed. “*” indicates P < 0.01.
Basal medium and culture conditions for the mycelial growth of Isaria farinosa during some experiments.
| Experiment | Basal medium | Culture condition |
|---|---|---|
| Carbon and nitrogen source | 0.5 g L−1 of MgSO4 7H2O, 0.5 g L−1 of KH2PO4, 0.65 g L−1 of Na2HPO4, 0.5 g L−1 of KCl and 0.5 mg L−1 VB1. (11 g L−1 of glucose and 2 g L−1 of NaNO3). | 50 mL/250 mL, 5% inoculum, 150 rpm, 12 h light (The light intensity was 50–55 lux)/12 h darkness, initial pH = 6.5 and 20 °C. |
| C/N ratio | 0.5 g L−1 of MgSO4 7H2O, 0.5 g L−1 of KH2PO4, 0.65 g L−1 of Na2HPO4, 0.5 g L−1 of KCl and 0.5 mg L−1 of VB1. (D-(+)-glucose and beef extract). | 50 mL/250 mL, 10% inoculum, 120 rpm, 12 h light (The light intensity was 50–55 lux)/12 h darkness, initial pH = 6 and 20 °C. |
| Macro and trace element* | 11 g L−1 of D-(+)-glucose, 0.7050 g L−1 of CO(NH2)2 and 0.5 mg L−1 of VB1. | Same as that of C/N ratio except the natural pH value |
| Optimal combination by using orthogonal matrix method | 14.20 g L−1 of D-(+)-glucose, 4.00 g L−1 of beef extract, 1.50 mg L−1 of VB1, 0.5 g L−1 of MgSO4·7H2O, 0.0498 g L−1 of FeSO4·7H2O, 0.5 g L−1 of KH2PO4, 0.5 g L−1 of KCl and 0.65 g L−1 of Na2HPO4. | Same as that of C/N ratio. |
| Fermentation at different altitudes | Same as that for optimal combination by using orthogonal matrix method. | Same as that of C/N ratio except 24 h darkness. |
*The basal medium excluding the test factor (s).
L8(27) orthogonal design for optimisation of the culture medium.
| Level | D-(+)-glucose (g L−1) | Beef extract (g L−1) | VB1 (mg L−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | 8.50 | 2.00 | 0.50 |
| Level 2 | 14.20 | 4.00 | 1.50 |