| Literature DB >> 30308948 |
Danielle H Demers1, Matthew A Knestrick2, Renee Fleeman3, Rahmy Tawfik4, Ala Azhari5, Ashley Souza6, Brian Vesely7, Mandy Netherton8, Rashmi Gupta9, Beatrice L Colon10, Christopher A Rice11, Mario A Rodríguez-Pérez12, Kyle H Rohde13, Dennis E Kyle14, Lindsey N Shaw15, Bill J Baker16.
Abstract
There is an acute need for new and effective agents to treat infectious diseases. We conducted a screening program to assess the potential of mangrove-derived endophytic fungi as a source of new antibiotics. Fungi cultured in the presence and absence of small molecule epigenetic modulators were screened against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the ESKAPE panel of bacterial pathogens, as well as two eukaryotic infective agents, Leishmania donovani and Naegleria fowleri. By comparison of bioactivity data among treatments and targets, trends became evident, such as the result that more than 60% of active extracts were revealed to be selective to a single target. Validating the technique of using small molecules to dysregulate secondary metabolite production pathways, nearly half (44%) of those fungi producing active extracts only did so following histone deacetylase inhibitory (HDACi) or DNA methyltransferase inhibitory (DNMTi) treatment.Entities:
Keywords: endophytic fungi; epigenetic modification; infectious disease drug discovery; mangroves; screening
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30308948 PMCID: PMC6212984 DOI: 10.3390/md16100376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Structure of the screening campaign. Each fungal isolate was (A) grown under 3 culture conditions, (B) generating 3 extracts per organism. Each extract was (C) screened in 5 assay systems. The screening of 530 isolates resulted in the production of 1608 extracts, and comprehensive screening in multiple assays resulted in a total of 8040 data points.
Figure 2Geographic distribution of sampling sites in (A) Clearwater, Sarasota, Everglades City and Layton, Florida; and (B) Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
Figure 3Distribution of (A) lead extracts and (B) treatment method for lead extracts.
Figure 4Distribution of selectively active lead extracts in the screening subset, by target.