Literature DB >> 30291478

The Radiologist's Gaze: Mapping Three-Dimensional Visual Search in Computed Tomography of the Abdomen and Pelvis.

Linda C Kelahan1,2, Allan Fong3, Joseph Blumenthal3, Swaminathan Kandaswamy4, Raj M Ratwani3, Ross W Filice5.   

Abstract

A radiologist's search pattern can directly influence patient management. A missed finding is a missed opportunity for intervention. Multiple studies have attempted to describe and quantify search patterns but have mainly focused on chest radiographs and chest CTs. Here, we describe and quantify the visual search patterns of 17 radiologists as they scroll through 6 CTs of the abdomen and pelvis. Search pattern tracings varied among individuals and remained relatively consistent per individual between cases. Attendings and trainees had similar eye metric statistics with respect to time to first fixation (TTFF), number of fixations in the region of interest (ROI), fixation duration in ROI, mean saccadic amplitude, or total number of fixations. Attendings had fewer numbers of fixations per second versus trainees (p < 0.001), suggesting efficiency due to expertise. In those cases that were accurately interpreted, TTFF was shorter (p = 0.04), the number of fixations per second and number of fixations in ROI were higher (p = 0.04, p = 0.02, respectively), and fixation duration in ROI was increased (p = 0.02). We subsequently categorized radiologists as "scanners" or "drillers" by both qualitative and quantitative methods and found no differences in accuracy with most radiologists being categorized as "drillers." This study describes visual search patterns of radiologists in interpretation of CTs of the abdomen and pelvis to better approach future endeavors in determining the effects of manipulations such as fatigue, interruptions, and computer-aided detection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body imaging; CT; Drillers; Eye tracking; Scanners; Visual search

Year:  2019        PMID: 30291478      PMCID: PMC6456635          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-018-0121-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  15 in total

1.  Searching for lung nodules. Visual dwell indicates locations of false-positive and false-negative decisions.

Authors:  H L Kundel; C F Nodine; E A Krupinski
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Thin-section CT of the lungs: eye-tracking analysis of the visual approach to reading tiled and stacked display formats.

Authors:  S M Ellis; X Hu; L Dempere-Marco; G Z Yang; A U Wells; D M Hansell
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study.

Authors:  Harold L Kundel; Calvin F Nodine; Emily F Conant; Susan P Weinstein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Role of faulty visual search in the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiography.

Authors:  K S Berbaum; E A Franken; D D Dorfman; E M Miller; R T Caldwell; D M Kuehn; M L Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Scanners and drillers: characterizing expert visual search through volumetric images.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Melissa Le-Hoa Vo; Alex Olwal; Francine Jacobson; Steven E Seltzer; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  A Human Factors Approach to Understanding the Types and Sources of Interruptions in Radiology Reading Rooms.

Authors:  Raj M Ratwani; Eric Wang; Allan Fong; Cirrelda J Cooper
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  A passing glance? Differences in eye tracking and gaze patterns between trainees and experts reading plain film bunion radiographs.

Authors:  Nicholas A Giovinco; Steven M Sutton; John D Miller; Timothy M Rankin; Grant W Gonzalez; Bijan Najafi; David G Armstrong
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 1.286

8.  Mechanism of satisfaction of search: eye position recordings in the reading of chest radiographs.

Authors:  S Samuel; H L Kundel; C F Nodine; L C Toto
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Towards a framework for analysis of eye-tracking studies in the three dimensional environment: a study of visual search by experienced readers of endoluminal CT colonography.

Authors:  E Helbren; S Halligan; P Phillips; D Boone; T R Fanshawe; S A Taylor; D Manning; A Gale; D G Altman; S Mallett
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  The effect of expertise on eye movement behaviour in medical image perception.

Authors:  Raymond Bertram; Laura Helle; Johanna K Kaakinen; Erkki Svedström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Mandating Limits on Workload, Duty, and Speed in Radiology.

Authors:  Robert Alexander; Stephen Waite; Michael A Bruno; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Leonard Berlin; Stephen Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 29.146

2.  Characteristics of expert search behavior in volumetric medical image interpretation.

Authors:  Lauren H Williams; Ann J Carrigan; Megan Mills; William F Auffermann; Anina N Rich; Trafton Drew
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-07-14

3.  The Search Patterns of Abdominal Imaging Subspecialists for Abdominal Computed Tomography: Toward a Foundational Pattern for New Radiology Residents.

Authors:  Mark A Kliewer; Michael Hartung; C Shawn Green
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2021-01-09

4.  The Back Alleys and Dark Corners of Abdomen and Pelvis Computed Tomography: The Most Frequent Sites of Missed Findings in the Multiplanar Era.

Authors:  Mark A Kliewer; Mikala R Brinkman; J Louis Hinshaw
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2020-11-02

Review 5.  What do radiologists look for? Advances and limitations of perceptual learning in radiologic search.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Stephen Waite; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.