Lauren H Williams1, Ann J Carrigan2,3,4, Megan Mills5, William F Auffermann5, Anina N Rich3,4,6, Trafton Drew7. 1. University of California, San Diego, Department of Psychology, San Diego, California, United States. 2. Macquarie University, Department of Psychology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Macquarie University, Perception in Action Research Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 4. Macquarie University, Centre for Elite Performance, Expertise, and Training, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 5. University of Utah, School of Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States. 6. Macquarie University, Department of Cognitive Science, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 7. University of Utah, Department of Psychology, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.
Abstract
Purpose: Experienced radiologists have enhanced global processing ability relative to novices, allowing experts to rapidly detect medical abnormalities without performing an exhaustive search. However, evidence for global processing models is primarily limited to two-dimensional image interpretation, and it is unclear whether these findings generalize to volumetric images, which are widely used in clinical practice. We examined whether radiologists searching volumetric images use methods consistent with global processing models of expertise. In addition, we investigated whether search strategy (scanning/drilling) differs with experience level. Approach: Fifty radiologists with a wide range of experience evaluated chest computed-tomography scans for lung nodules while their eye movements and scrolling behaviors were tracked. Multiple linear regressions were used to determine: (1) how search behaviors differed with years of experience and the number of chest CTs evaluated per week and (2) which search behaviors predicted better performance. Results: Contrary to global processing models based on 2D images, experience was unrelated to measures of global processing (saccadic amplitude, coverage, time to first fixation, search time, and depth passes) in this task. Drilling behavior was associated with better accuracy than scanning behavior when controlling for observer experience. Greater image coverage was a strong predictor of task accuracy. Conclusions: Global processing ability may play a relatively small role in volumetric image interpretation, where global scene statistics are not available to radiologists in a single glance. Rather, in volumetric images, it may be more important to engage in search strategies that support a more thorough search of the image.
Purpose: Experienced radiologists have enhanced global processing ability relative to novices, allowing experts to rapidly detect medical abnormalities without performing an exhaustive search. However, evidence for global processing models is primarily limited to two-dimensional image interpretation, and it is unclear whether these findings generalize to volumetric images, which are widely used in clinical practice. We examined whether radiologists searching volumetric images use methods consistent with global processing models of expertise. In addition, we investigated whether search strategy (scanning/drilling) differs with experience level. Approach: Fifty radiologists with a wide range of experience evaluated chest computed-tomography scans for lung nodules while their eye movements and scrolling behaviors were tracked. Multiple linear regressions were used to determine: (1) how search behaviors differed with years of experience and the number of chest CTs evaluated per week and (2) which search behaviors predicted better performance. Results: Contrary to global processing models based on 2D images, experience was unrelated to measures of global processing (saccadic amplitude, coverage, time to first fixation, search time, and depth passes) in this task. Drilling behavior was associated with better accuracy than scanning behavior when controlling for observer experience. Greater image coverage was a strong predictor of task accuracy. Conclusions: Global processing ability may play a relatively small role in volumetric image interpretation, where global scene statistics are not available to radiologists in a single glance. Rather, in volumetric images, it may be more important to engage in search strategies that support a more thorough search of the image.
Authors: Trafton Drew; Melissa Le-Hoa Vo; Alex Olwal; Francine Jacobson; Steven E Seltzer; Jeremy M Wolfe Journal: J Vis Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 2.240
Authors: Anouk van der Gijp; Koen L Vincken; Christy Boscardin; Emily M Webb; Olle Th J Ten Cate; David M Naeger Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Maram M Alakhras; Patrick C Brennan; Mary Rickard; Roger Bourne; Claudia Mello-Thoms Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Trafton Drew; Mark Lavelle; Kathleen F Kerr; Hannah Shucard; Tad T Brunyé; Donald L Weaver; Joann G Elmore Journal: J Vis Date: 2021-10-05 Impact factor: 2.240
Authors: Michael C Hout; Megan H Papesh; Saleem Masadeh; Hailey Sandin; Stephen C Walenchok; Phillip Post; Jessica Madrid; Bryan White; Juan D Guevara Pinto; Julian Welsh; Dre Goode; Rebecca Skulsky; Mariana Cazares Rodriguez Journal: Behav Res Methods Date: 2022-03-30