Literature DB >> 17255410

Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study.

Harold L Kundel1, Calvin F Nodine, Emily F Conant, Susan P Weinstein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that rapid and accurate performance of the proficient observer in mammogram interpretation involves a shift in the mechanism of image perception from a relatively slow search-to-find mode to a relatively fast holistic mode.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval, and participant informed consent was obtained; patient informed consent was not required. The eye positions of three full-time mammographers, one attending radiologist, two mammography fellows, and three radiology residents were recorded during the interpretation of 20 normal and 20 subtly abnormal mammograms. The search time required to first locate a cancer, as well as the initial eye scan path, was determined and compared with diagnostic performance as measured with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: The median time for all observers to fixate a cancer, regardless of the decision outcome, was 1.13 seconds, with a range of 0.68 second to 3.06 seconds. Even though most of the lesions were fixated, recognition of them as cancerous ranged from 85% (17 of 20) to 10% (two of 20), with corresponding areas under the ROC curve of 0.87-0.40. The ROC index of detectability, d(a), was linearly related to the time to first fixate a cancer with a correlation (r(2)) of 0.81.
CONCLUSION: The rapid initial fixation of a true abnormality is evidence for a global perceptual process capable of analyzing the visual input of the entire retinal image and pinpointing the spatial location of an abnormality. It appears to be more highly developed in the most proficient observers, replacing the less efficient initial search-to-find strategies. (c) RSNA, 2007.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17255410     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2422051997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  81 in total

1.  Computational assessment of visual search strategies in volumetric medical images.

Authors:  Gezheng Wen; Avigael Aizenman; Trafton Drew; Jeremy M Wolfe; Tamara Miner Haygood; Mia K Markey
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-01-06

2.  Teaching search patterns to medical trainees in an educational laboratory to improve perception of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  William F Auffermann; Brent P Little; Srini Tridandapani
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-11-06

3.  Enhancement of breast CADx with unlabeled data.

Authors:  Andrew R Jamieson; Maryellen L Giger; Karen Drukker; Lorenzo L Pesce
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A visual-search model observer for multislice-multiview SPECT images.

Authors:  Howard C Gifford
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Scanners and drillers: characterizing expert visual search through volumetric images.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Melissa Le-Hoa Vo; Alex Olwal; Francine Jacobson; Steven E Seltzer; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Through the eyes of the expert: Evaluating holistic processing in architects through gaze-contingent viewing.

Authors:  Spencer Ivy; Taren Rohovit; Mark Lavelle; Lace Padilla; Jeanine Stefanucci; Dustin Stokes; Trafton Drew
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-01-29

7.  The Radiologist's Gaze: Mapping Three-Dimensional Visual Search in Computed Tomography of the Abdomen and Pelvis.

Authors:  Linda C Kelahan; Allan Fong; Joseph Blumenthal; Swaminathan Kandaswamy; Raj M Ratwani; Ross W Filice
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  A half-second glimpse often lets radiologists identify breast cancer cases even when viewing the mammogram of the opposite breast.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Tamara Miner Haygood; Julie Cooper; Anne-Marie Culpan; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A status report on free-response analysis.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty; Hong-Jun Yoon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.