Literature DB >> 7862998

Mechanism of satisfaction of search: eye position recordings in the reading of chest radiographs.

S Samuel1, H L Kundel, C F Nodine, L C Toto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To use the eye position recordings of observers as they read chest images to advance understanding of the mechanism of "satisfaction of search," a phenomenon in which the detection of one abnormality interferes with the detection of other abnormalities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight radiologists examined chest images that contained simulated pulmonary nodules and native abnormalities. Accuracy in detecting nodules and native abnormalities and eye position, gaze duration, and total search time were recorded.
RESULTS: Nodule detectability was lower on native abnormality-containing images than it was on normal images (P < .005). Native-abnormality detectability was not negatively affected by the nodules. Most missed nodules were fixated; only those on images without native abnormalities, however, received prolonged visual attention.
CONCLUSION: The satisfaction of search phenomenon is an important source of error in the detection of subtle abnormalities but not of obvious abnormalities. Obvious abnormalities capture visual attention and decrease vigilance for more subtle abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7862998     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.194.3.7862998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  31 in total

1.  Quality control in neuroradiology: discrepancies in image interpretation among academic neuroradiologists.

Authors:  L S Babiarz; D M Yousem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Systematic review: bias in imaging studies - the effect of manipulating clinical context, recall bias and reporting intensity.

Authors:  Darren Boone; Steve Halligan; Susan Mallett; Stuart A Taylor; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Efficacy of x-ray assessment in emergency surgical departments: an evaluation in a level I trauma center].

Authors:  O Ackermann; A Wetter; E Chelangattucherry; I Emmanouilidis; C Rülander
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology.

Authors:  Antonio Pinto; Luca Brunese
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-28

Review 5.  Errors in imaging patients in the emergency setting.

Authors:  Antonio Pinto; Alfonso Reginelli; Fabio Pinto; Giuseppe Lo Re; Federico Midiri; Carlo Muzj; Luigia Romano; Luca Brunese
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Michael J Van Wert; Naomi M Kenner; Skyler S Place; Nour Kibbi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

7.  Does computer-aided diagnosis for lung tumors change satisfaction of search in chest radiography?

Authors:  Kevin S Berbaum; Robert T Caldwell; Kevin M Schartz; Brad H Thompson; E A Franken
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Medico-legal claims against English radiologists: 1995-2006.

Authors:  S F S Halpin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Investigating the link between radiologists' gaze, diagnostic decision, and image content.

Authors:  Georgia Tourassi; Sophie Voisin; Vincent Paquit; Elizabeth Krupinski
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners: trained observers miss rare targets, too.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; David N Brunelli; Joshua Rubinstein; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.