Literature DB >> 25441848

A passing glance? Differences in eye tracking and gaze patterns between trainees and experts reading plain film bunion radiographs.

Nicholas A Giovinco1, Steven M Sutton2, John D Miller3, Timothy M Rankin4, Grant W Gonzalez5, Bijan Najafi6, David G Armstrong7.   

Abstract

Eye tracking and gaze pattern studies have been used to evaluate human behavior for decades. This is because of its ability to reveal conscious and subconscious behaviors when subjects are tasked with observation, decision making, and surgical performance. Many have popularized the use of this technology for radiographic assessment while evaluating radiologist behaviors, but little has been described for surgeon behavior patterns when evaluating preoperative deformities by radiograph. Because the radiographic assessment strongly influences surgical selection, the present study was designed to evaluate the differences between groups of novice and experienced surgeons' gaze patterns when tasked to describe hallux valgus deformities. The subjects were asked to rate the deformity as "none," "mild," "moderate," or "severe." Using an externally mounted eye tracking system, our study assessed saccades, fixations, overall time spent per radiograph, and the subjects' chosen bunion rating. Both the novice and advanced groups of foot and ankle surgeons were tasked to evaluate 25 total anteroposterior radiographs from patients who presented with a primary complaint of bunion pain. These patients were chosen at random, such that all participating surgeons had no previous patient familiarization. Statistically significant differences were observed with regard to the activity and rating of the moderate bunion films. The experience of surgeons does appear to modify gaze behavior with respect to time and attention, such that less overall time spent per image is needed by the advanced group, with improved efficiency. Future academic curriculum and training techniques could be developed to reflect these potential technical differences in search behavior, diagnostic technique, and surgical selection strategy.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ergonomic; gaze; hallux valgus; radiograph; saccadic data; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25441848     DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1067-2516            Impact factor:   1.286


  8 in total

1.  Accuracy is in the eyes of the pathologist: The visual interpretive process and diagnostic accuracy with digital whole slide images.

Authors:  Tad T Brunyé; Ezgi Mercan; Donald L Weaver; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  The Radiologist's Gaze: Mapping Three-Dimensional Visual Search in Computed Tomography of the Abdomen and Pelvis.

Authors:  Linda C Kelahan; Allan Fong; Joseph Blumenthal; Swaminathan Kandaswamy; Raj M Ratwani; Ross W Filice
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Gaze entropy reflects surgical task load.

Authors:  Leandro L Di Stasi; Carolina Diaz-Piedra; Héctor Rieiro; José M Sánchez Carrión; Mercedes Martin Berrido; Gonzalo Olivares; Andrés Catena
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  How visual search relates to visual diagnostic performance: a narrative systematic review of eye-tracking research in radiology.

Authors:  A van der Gijp; C J Ravesloot; H Jarodzka; M F van der Schaaf; I C van der Schaaf; J P J van Schaik; Th J Ten Cate
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.853

Review 5.  The Holistic Processing Account of Visual Expertise in Medical Image Perception: A Review.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-28

6.  Differences in Gaze Fixation Location and Duration Between Resident and Fellowship Sonographers Interpreting a Focused Assessment With Sonography in Trauma.

Authors:  Colin R Bell; Adam Szulewski; Melanie Walker; Conor McKaigney; Graeme Ross; Louise Rang; Joseph Newbigging; John Kendall
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-02-28

7.  A comparison of visual identification of dental radiographic and nonradiographic images using eye tracking technology.

Authors:  Michael G Botelho; Manikandan Ekambaram; Sangeeta Y Bhuyan; Andy Wai Kan Yeung; Ray Tanaka; Michael M Bornstein; Kar Yan Li
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2019-10-18

8.  Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers.

Authors:  David Roy Anderson; Sarah Blissett; Patricia O'Sullivan; Atif Qasim
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2021-05-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.