OBJECTIVE: To use eye-tracking analysis to identify the differences in approach to and efficiency of reading thin-section CT of the lungs presented tiled and stacked soft-copy displays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four chest radiologists read 16 thin-section CT examinations displayed in either a tiled (four images at once) or stacked (full screen cine) format. Eye-movements were recorded and analysed in terms of movement type; saccade distance (classified by the calculated range of useful peripheral vision), number of fixations, duration and direction of gaze-comparison of the areas of the images viewed. RESULTS: Cases presented in stacked format were read quicker than when presented in tiled format with a greater fixation frequency (5 fixations versus 4.5 fixations points per 100 data points; p<0.001) and a greater proportion of short saccades (97% versus 94%; p<0.005). The consistency with which the observers viewed equivalent areas of the scan images in different cases was greater when viewing in stacked format (mean kappa 0.45 versus 0.36; p<0.05) suggesting a more systematic approach to reading. CONCLUSION: Eye-tracking data demonstrates why thin-section CT examinations of the lungs are read more efficiently when displayed in a stack as opposed to a tiled format.
OBJECTIVE: To use eye-tracking analysis to identify the differences in approach to and efficiency of reading thin-section CT of the lungs presented tiled and stacked soft-copy displays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four chest radiologists read 16 thin-section CT examinations displayed in either a tiled (four images at once) or stacked (full screen cine) format. Eye-movements were recorded and analysed in terms of movement type; saccade distance (classified by the calculated range of useful peripheral vision), number of fixations, duration and direction of gaze-comparison of the areas of the images viewed. RESULTS: Cases presented in stacked format were read quicker than when presented in tiled format with a greater fixation frequency (5 fixations versus 4.5 fixations points per 100 data points; p<0.001) and a greater proportion of short saccades (97% versus 94%; p<0.005). The consistency with which the observers viewed equivalent areas of the scan images in different cases was greater when viewing in stacked format (mean kappa 0.45 versus 0.36; p<0.05) suggesting a more systematic approach to reading. CONCLUSION: Eye-tracking data demonstrates why thin-section CT examinations of the lungs are read more efficiently when displayed in a stack as opposed to a tiled format.
Authors: Andrew S A Chetwood; Ka-Wai Kwok; Loi-Wah Sun; George P Mylonas; James Clark; Ara Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Trafton Drew; Melissa Le-Hoa Vo; Alex Olwal; Francine Jacobson; Steven E Seltzer; Jeremy M Wolfe Journal: J Vis Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 2.240
Authors: Linda C Kelahan; Allan Fong; Joseph Blumenthal; Swaminathan Kandaswamy; Raj M Ratwani; Ross W Filice Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: E Helbren; S Halligan; P Phillips; D Boone; T R Fanshawe; S A Taylor; D Manning; A Gale; D G Altman; S Mallett Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 3.039