Literature DB >> 33194312

The Back Alleys and Dark Corners of Abdomen and Pelvis Computed Tomography: The Most Frequent Sites of Missed Findings in the Multiplanar Era.

Mark A Kliewer1, Mikala R Brinkman2, J Louis Hinshaw3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Radiologists reading multiplanar abdominal/pelvic computed tomography (CT) are vulnerable to oversight of specific anatomic areas, leading to perceptual errors (misses). The aims of this study are to identify common sites of major perceptual error at our institution and then to put these in context with earlier studies to produce a comprehensive overview.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed our quality assurance database over an 8-year period for cases of major perceptual error on CT examinations of the abdomen and pelvis. A major perceptual error was defined as a missed finding that had altered management in a way potentially detrimental to the patient. Record was made of patient age, gender, study indication, study priority (stat/routine), and use of IV and/or oral contrast. Anatomic locations were subdivided as lung bases, liver, pancreas, kidneys, spleen, mesentery, peritoneum, retroperitoneum, small bowel, colon, appendix, vasculature, body wall, and bones.
RESULTS: A total of 216 missed findings were identified in 201 patients. The most common indication for the study was cancer follow-up (71%) followed by infection (11%) and abdominal pain (6%). The most common anatomic regions of error were the liver (15%), peritoneum (10%), body wall (9%), retroperitoneum (8%), and mesentery (6%). Data from other studies were reorganized into congruent categories for comparison.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the most common sites of significant missed findings on multiplanar abdominal/pelvic CT included the mesentery, peritoneum, body wall, bowel, vasculature, and the liver in the arterial phase. Data from other similar studies were reorganized into congruent categories to provide a comprehensive overview.
© 2020 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal computed tomography; Overview; Perceptual error

Year:  2020        PMID: 33194312      PMCID: PMC7656035          DOI: 10.25259/JCIS_184_2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci        ISSN: 2156-5597


  20 in total

1.  Evidence-based anatomical review areas derived from systematic analysis of cases from a radiological departmental discrepancy meeting.

Authors:  S C Chin; J R Weir-McCall; P M Yeap; R D White; M J Budak; G Duncan; T B Oliver; I A Zealley
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  The Radiologist's Gaze: Mapping Three-Dimensional Visual Search in Computed Tomography of the Abdomen and Pelvis.

Authors:  Linda C Kelahan; Allan Fong; Joseph Blumenthal; Swaminathan Kandaswamy; Raj M Ratwani; Ross W Filice
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Interpretation of abdominal CT: analysis of errors and their causes.

Authors:  R E Bechtold; M Y Chen; D J Ott; R J Zagoria; E S Scharling; N T Wolfman; D J Vining
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Diagnostic errors in abdominopelvic CT interpretation: characterization based on report addenda.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Neil K Bansal
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-09

Review 5.  Common Resident Errors When Interpreting Computed Tomography of the Abdomen and Pelvis: A Review of Types, Pitfalls, and Strategies for Improvement.

Authors:  Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner; Brian C Allen; Charles M Maxfield
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2018-01-06

Review 6.  A Review of Perceptual Expertise in Radiology-How it develops, How we can test it, and Why humans still matter in the era of Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Stephen Waite; Zerwa Farooq; Arkadij Grigorian; Christopher Sistrom; Srinivas Kolla; Anthony Mancuso; Susana Martinez-Conde; Robert G Alexander; Alan Kantor; Stephen L Macknik
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Common patterns in 558 diagnostic radiology errors.

Authors:  Jennifer J Donald; Stuart A Barnard
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.735

8.  You think you know where you looked? You better look again.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; Avigael M Aizenman; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Missed lesions at abdominal oncologic CT: lessons learned from quality assurance.

Authors:  Bettina Siewert; Jacob Sosna; Ann McNamara; Vassilios Raptopoulos; Jonathan B Kruskal
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 10.  Blind spots at oncological CT: lessons learned from PET/CT.

Authors:  Jacob Sosna; Steven J Esses; Nikolay Yeframov; Hanna Bernstine; Tamar Sella; Shifra Fraifeld; Jonathan B Kruskal; David Groshar
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.