Literature DB >> 30284144

Mosaicism diminishes the value of pre-implantation embryo biopsies for detecting CRISPR/Cas9 induced mutations in sheep.

Marcela Vilarino1, Fabian Patrik Suchy2, Sheikh Tamir Rashid3, Helen Lindsay4,5, Juan Reyes1, Bret Roberts McNabb6, Talitha van der Meulen7, Mark O Huising7, Hiromitsu Nakauchi8, Pablo Juan Ross9.   

Abstract

The production of knock-out (KO) livestock models is both expensive and time consuming due to their long gestational interval and low number of offspring. One alternative to increase efficiency is performing a genetic screening to select pre-implantation embryos that have incorporated the desired mutation. Here we report the use of sheep embryo biopsies for detecting CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutations targeting the gene PDX1 prior to embryo transfer. PDX1 is a critical gene for pancreas development and the target gene required for the creation of pancreatogenesis-disabled sheep. We evaluated the viability of biopsied embryos in vitro and in vivo, and we determined the mutation efficiency using PCR combined with gel electrophoresis and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). Next, we determined the presence of mosaicism in ~ 50% of the recovered fetuses employing a clonal sequencing methodology. While the use of biopsies did not compromise embryo viability, the presence of mosaicism diminished the diagnostic value of the technique. If mosaicism could be overcome, pre-implantation embryo biopsies for mutation screening represents a powerful approach that will streamline the creation of KO animals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Gene-editing; Livestock; Mosaic; Ovine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30284144     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-018-0094-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  32 in total

1.  Detailed investigation of factors influencing amplification efficiency and allele drop-out in single cell PCR: implications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Wirawit Piyamongkol; Mercedes G Bermúdez; Joyce C Harper; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 2.  Stem cells and interspecies chimaeras.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Henry T Greely; Rudolf Jaenisch; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Janet Rossant; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  CrispRVariants charts the mutation spectrum of genome engineering experiments.

Authors:  Helen Lindsay; Alexa Burger; Berthin Biyong; Anastasia Felker; Christopher Hess; Jonas Zaugg; Elena Chiavacci; Carolin Anders; Martin Jinek; Christian Mosimann; Mark D Robinson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Generation of kidney from pluripotent stem cells via blastocyst complementation.

Authors:  Jo-ichi Usui; Toshihiro Kobayashi; Tomoyuki Yamaguchi; A S Knisely; Ryuichi Nishinakamura; Hiromitsu Nakauchi
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Laser-assisted Cytoplasmic Microinjection in Livestock Zygotes.

Authors:  Yanina S Bogliotti; Marcela Vilarino; Pablo J Ross
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Interspecies Chimerism with Mammalian Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Aida Platero-Luengo; Masahiro Sakurai; Atsushi Sugawara; Maria Antonia Gil; Takayoshi Yamauchi; Keiichiro Suzuki; Yanina Soledad Bogliotti; Cristina Cuello; Mariana Morales Valencia; Daiji Okumura; Jingping Luo; Marcela Vilariño; Inmaculada Parrilla; Delia Alba Soto; Cristina A Martinez; Tomoaki Hishida; Sonia Sánchez-Bautista; M Llanos Martinez-Martinez; Huili Wang; Alicia Nohalez; Emi Aizawa; Paloma Martinez-Redondo; Alejandro Ocampo; Pradeep Reddy; Jordi Roca; Elizabeth A Maga; Concepcion Rodriguez Esteban; W Travis Berggren; Estrella Nuñez Delicado; Jeronimo Lajara; Isabel Guillen; Pedro Guillen; Josep M Campistol; Emilio A Martinez; Pablo Juan Ross; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering.

Authors:  Thomas Gaj; Charles A Gersbach; Carlos F Barbas
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 19.536

8.  Timing of CRISPR/Cas9-related mRNA microinjection after activation as an important factor affecting genome editing efficiency in porcine oocytes.

Authors:  Masahiro Sato; Maeda Kosuke; Miyu Koriyama; Emi Inada; Issei Saitoh; Masato Ohtsuka; Shingo Nakamura; Takayuki Sakurai; Satoshi Watanabe; Kazuchika Miyoshi
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Promoting Cas9 degradation reduces mosaic mutations in non-human primate embryos.

Authors:  Zhuchi Tu; Weili Yang; Sen Yan; An Yin; Jinquan Gao; Xudong Liu; Yinghui Zheng; Jiezhao Zheng; Zhujun Li; Su Yang; Shihua Li; Xiangyu Guo; Xiao-Jiang Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Detecting mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies: current challenges and future possibilities.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi; Richard Scott; Nathan Treff
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  10 in total

1.  CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the MYO7A gene in rhesus macaque embryos to generate a primate model of Usher syndrome type 1B.

Authors:  Junghyun Ryu; John P Statz; William Chan; Fernanda C Burch; John V Brigande; Beth Kempton; Edward V Porsov; Lauren Renner; Trevor McGill; Benjamin J Burwitz; Carol B Hanna; Martha Neuringer; Jon D Hennebold
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Effect of ARTEMIS (DCLRE1C) deficiency and microinjection timing on editing efficiency during somatic cell nuclear transfer and in vitro fertilization using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Authors:  Yunsheng Li; Malavika K Adur; Wei Wang; R Blythe Schultz; Benjamin Hale; Wesley Wierson; Sara E Charley; Maura McGrail; Jeffrey Essner; Christopher K Tuggle; Jason W Ross
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  One-step generation of a targeted knock-in calf using the CRISPR-Cas9 system in bovine zygotes.

Authors:  Joseph R Owen; Sadie L Hennig; Bret R McNabb; Tamer A Mansour; Justin M Smith; Jason C Lin; Amy E Young; Josephine F Trott; James D Murray; Mary E Delany; Pablo J Ross; Alison L Van Eenennaam
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Evaluation of mutation rates, mosaicism and off target mutations when injecting Cas9 mRNA or protein for genome editing of bovine embryos.

Authors:  Sadie L Hennig; Joseph R Owen; Jason C Lin; Amy E Young; Pablo J Ross; Alison L Van Eenennaam; James D Murray
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Cytoplasmic Injection of Zygotes to Genome Edit Naturally Occurring Sequence Variants Into Bovine Embryos.

Authors:  Jingwei Wei; Brigid Brophy; Sally-Ann Cole; Jannis Moormann; Jens Boch; Gӧtz Laible
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 6.  Human germline genome editing.

Authors:  Rebecca A Lea; Kathy K Niakan
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 7.  Current status of the application of gene editing in pigs.

Authors:  Fuminori Tanihara; Maki Hirata; Takeshige Otoi
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  CRISPR in livestock: From editing to printing.

Authors:  A Menchaca; P C Dos Santos-Neto; A P Mulet; M Crispo
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Harnessing endogenous repair mechanisms for targeted gene knock-in of bovine embryos.

Authors:  Joseph R Owen; Sadie L Hennig; Bret R McNabb; Jason C Lin; Amy E Young; James D Murray; Pablo J Ross; Alison L Van Eenennaam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Novel CRISPR-Cas Systems: An Updated Review of the Current Achievements, Applications, and Future Research Perspectives.

Authors:  Sweta Nidhi; Uttpal Anand; Patrik Oleksak; Pooja Tripathi; Jonathan A Lal; George Thomas; Kamil Kuca; Vijay Tripathi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.