Literature DB >> 29195121

Timing of CRISPR/Cas9-related mRNA microinjection after activation as an important factor affecting genome editing efficiency in porcine oocytes.

Masahiro Sato1, Maeda Kosuke2, Miyu Koriyama2, Emi Inada3, Issei Saitoh4, Masato Ohtsuka5, Shingo Nakamura6, Takayuki Sakurai7, Satoshi Watanabe8, Kazuchika Miyoshi2.   

Abstract

Recently, successful one-step genome editing by microinjection of CRISPR/Cas9-related mRNA components into the porcine zygote has been described. Given the relatively long gestational period and the high cost of housing swine, the establishment of an effective microinjection-based porcine genome editing method is urgently required. Previously, we have attempted to disrupt a gene encoding α-1,3-galactosyltransferase (GGTA1), which synthesizes the α-Gal epitope, by microinjecting CRISPR/Cas9-related nucleic acids and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) mRNA into porcine oocytes immediately after electrical activation. We found that genome editing was indeed induced, although the resulting blastocysts were mosaic and the frequency of modified cells appeared to be low (50%). To improve genome editing efficiency in porcine oocytes, cytoplasmic injection was performed 6 h after electrical activation, a stage wherein the pronucleus is formed. The developing blastocysts exhibited higher levels of EGFP. Furthermore, the T7 endonuclease 1 assay and subsequent sequencing demonstrated that these embryos exhibited increased genome editing efficiencies (69%), although a high degree of mosaicism for the induced mutation was still observed. Single blastocyst-based cytochemical staining with fluorescently labeled isolectin BS-I-B4 also confirmed this mosaicism. Thus, the development of a technique that avoids or reduces such mosaicism would be a key factor for efficient knock out piglet production via microinjection.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biallelic KO; CRISPR/Cas9; Indels; Isolectin BS-I-B(4); Microinjection; Mosaicism; mRNA; α-1,3-Galactosyltransferase; α-Gal epitope

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29195121     DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.11.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  12 in total

1.  Mosaicism diminishes the value of pre-implantation embryo biopsies for detecting CRISPR/Cas9 induced mutations in sheep.

Authors:  Marcela Vilarino; Fabian Patrik Suchy; Sheikh Tamir Rashid; Helen Lindsay; Juan Reyes; Bret Roberts McNabb; Talitha van der Meulen; Mark O Huising; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Pablo Juan Ross
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Transgenesis in the acoel worm Hofstenia miamia.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ricci; Mansi Srivastava
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 12.270

3.  Effect of ARTEMIS (DCLRE1C) deficiency and microinjection timing on editing efficiency during somatic cell nuclear transfer and in vitro fertilization using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Authors:  Yunsheng Li; Malavika K Adur; Wei Wang; R Blythe Schultz; Benjamin Hale; Wesley Wierson; Sara E Charley; Maura McGrail; Jeffrey Essner; Christopher K Tuggle; Jason W Ross
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Effects of concentration of CRISPR/Cas9 components on genetic mosaicism in cytoplasmic microinjected porcine embryos.

Authors:  Fuminori Tanihara; Maki Hirata; Nhien Thi Nguyen; Quynh Anh LE; Takayuki Hirano; Takeshige Otoi
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Suppression of mosaic mutation by co-delivery of CRISPR associated protein 9 and three-prime repair exonuclease 2 into porcine zygotes via electroporation.

Authors:  Shiro Yamashita; Yuhei Kogasaka; Yuuki Hiradate; Kentaro Tanemura; Yutaka Sendai
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  MicroRNA-210 Regulates Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Apoptosis in Porcine Embryos.

Authors:  Muhammad Rosyid Ridlo; Eui Hyun Kim; Geon A Kim
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Comparison of the effects of introducing the CRISPR/Cas9 system by microinjection and electroporation into porcine embryos at different stages.

Authors:  Quynh Anh Le; Fuminori Tanihara; Manita Wittayarat; Zhao Namula; Yoko Sato; Qingyi Lin; Koki Takebayashi; Maki Hirata; Takeshige Otoi
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2021-01-06

Review 8.  Current status of the application of gene editing in pigs.

Authors:  Fuminori Tanihara; Maki Hirata; Takeshige Otoi
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 2.214

9.  Generation of Gene-Knockout Mongolian Gerbils via CRISPR/Cas9 System.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Peikun Zhao; Zidai Song; Xiaoyan Du; Xueyun Huo; Jing Lu; Xin Liu; Jianyi Lv; Changlong Li; Meng Guo; Zhenwen Chen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-07-08

10.  Human immune reactivity of GGTA1/CMAH/A3GALT2 triple knockout Yucatan miniature pigs.

Authors:  Joohyun Shim; Nayoung Ko; Hyoung-Joo Kim; Yongjin Lee; Jeong-Woong Lee; Dong-Il Jin; Hyunil Kim; Kimyung Choi
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.788

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.