Literature DB >> 33581720

One-step generation of a targeted knock-in calf using the CRISPR-Cas9 system in bovine zygotes.

Joseph R Owen1, Sadie L Hennig1, Bret R McNabb2, Tamer A Mansour2,3, Justin M Smith1, Jason C Lin1, Amy E Young1, Josephine F Trott1, James D Murray1,2, Mary E Delany1, Pablo J Ross1, Alison L Van Eenennaam4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The homologous recombination (HR) pathway is largely inactive in early embryos prior to the first cell division, making it difficult to achieve targeted gene knock-ins. The homology-mediated end joining (HMEJ)-based strategy has been shown to increase knock-in efficiency relative to HR, non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), and microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) strategies in non-dividing cells.
RESULTS: By introducing gRNA/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex and a HMEJ-based donor template with 1 kb homology arms flanked by the H11 safe harbor locus gRNA target site, knock-in rates of 40% of a 5.1 kb bovine sex-determining region Y (SRY)-green fluorescent protein (GFP) template were achieved in Bos taurus zygotes. Embryos that developed to the blastocyst stage were screened for GFP, and nine were transferred to recipient cows resulting in a live phenotypically normal bull calf. Genomic analyses revealed no wildtype sequence at the H11 target site, but rather a 26 bp insertion allele, and a complex 38 kb knock-in allele with seven copies of the SRY-GFP template and a single copy of the donor plasmid backbone. An additional minor 18 kb allele was detected that looks to be a derivative of the 38 kb allele resulting from the deletion of an inverted repeat of four copies of the SRY-GFP template.
CONCLUSION: The allelic heterogeneity in this biallelic knock-in calf appears to have resulted from a combination of homology directed repair, homology independent targeted insertion by blunt-end ligation, NHEJ, and rearrangement following editing of the gRNA target site in the donor template. This study illustrates the potential to produce targeted gene knock-in animals by direct cytoplasmic injection of bovine embryos with gRNA/Cas9, although further optimization is required to ensure a precise single-copy gene integration event.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bos taurus; Bovine; CRISPR; Embryos; Gene editing; Knock-in

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33581720      PMCID: PMC7881600          DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-07418-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


  36 in total

Review 1.  Control of gene editing by manipulation of DNA repair mechanisms.

Authors:  Eric Danner; Sanum Bashir; Saniye Yumlu; Wolfgang Wurst; Benedikt Wefers; Ralf Kühn
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 2.  Mosaicism in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing.

Authors:  Maryam Mehravar; Abolfazl Shirazi; Mahboobeh Nazari; Mehdi Banan
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  DPPA3 prevents cytosine hydroxymethylation of the maternal pronucleus and is required for normal development in bovine embryos.

Authors:  Azizollah Bakhtari; Pablo J Ross
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.528

4.  In vivo genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homology-independent targeted integration.

Authors:  Keiichiro Suzuki; Yuji Tsunekawa; Reyna Hernandez-Benitez; Jun Wu; Jie Zhu; Euiseok J Kim; Fumiyuki Hatanaka; Mako Yamamoto; Toshikazu Araoka; Zhe Li; Masakazu Kurita; Tomoaki Hishida; Mo Li; Emi Aizawa; Shicheng Guo; Song Chen; April Goebl; Rupa Devi Soligalla; Jing Qu; Tingshuai Jiang; Xin Fu; Maryam Jafari; Concepcion Rodriguez Esteban; W Travis Berggren; Jeronimo Lajara; Estrella Nuñez-Delicado; Pedro Guillen; Josep M Campistol; Fumio Matsuzaki; Guang-Hui Liu; Pierre Magistretti; Kun Zhang; Edward M Callaway; Kang Zhang; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Template plasmid integration in germline genome-edited cattle.

Authors:  Alexis L Norris; Stella S Lee; Kevin J Greenlees; Daniel A Tadesse; Mayumi F Miller; Heather A Lombardi
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 6.  Gene Insertion Into Genomic Safe Harbors for Human Gene Therapy.

Authors:  Eirini P Papapetrou; Axel Schambach
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 11.454

7.  Testis Development.

Authors:  Juho-Antti Mäkelä; Jaakko J Koskenniemi; Helena E Virtanen; Jorma Toppari
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 8.  Proposed U.S. regulation of gene-edited food animals is not fit for purpose.

Authors:  Alison L Van Eenennaam; Kevin D Wells; James D Murray
Journal:  NPJ Sci Food       Date:  2019-03-20

9.  Cattle with a precise, zygote-mediated deletion safely eliminate the major milk allergen beta-lactoglobulin.

Authors:  Jingwei Wei; Stefan Wagner; Paul Maclean; Brigid Brophy; Sally Cole; Grant Smolenski; Dan F Carlson; Scott C Fahrenkrug; David N Wells; Götz Laible
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  De novo assembly of the cattle reference genome with single-molecule sequencing.

Authors:  Benjamin D Rosen; Derek M Bickhart; Robert D Schnabel; Sergey Koren; Christine G Elsik; Elizabeth Tseng; Troy N Rowan; Wai Y Low; Aleksey Zimin; Christine Couldrey; Richard Hall; Wenli Li; Arang Rhie; Jay Ghurye; Stephanie D McKay; Françoise Thibaud-Nissen; Jinna Hoffman; Brenda M Murdoch; Warren M Snelling; Tara G McDaneld; John A Hammond; John C Schwartz; Wilson Nandolo; Darren E Hagen; Christian Dreischer; Sebastian J Schultheiss; Steven G Schroeder; Adam M Phillippy; John B Cole; Curtis P Van Tassell; George Liu; Timothy P L Smith; Juan F Medrano
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 6.524

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Pluripotent Core in Bovine Embryos: A Review.

Authors:  Luis Aguila; Claudia Osycka-Salut; Favian Treulen; Ricardo Felmer
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 2.  A New Toolbox in Experimental Embryology-Alternative Model Organisms for Studying Preimplantation Development.

Authors:  Claudia Springer; Eckhard Wolf; Kilian Simmet
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2021-04-02

3.  A deletion at the polled PC locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle.

Authors:  Sadie L Hennig; Joseph R Owen; Jason C Lin; Bret R McNabb; Alison L Van Eenennaam; James D Murray
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.