Literature DB >> 34004455

Effect of ARTEMIS (DCLRE1C) deficiency and microinjection timing on editing efficiency during somatic cell nuclear transfer and in vitro fertilization using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Yunsheng Li1, Malavika K Adur2, Wei Wang3, R Blythe Schultz4, Benjamin Hale5, Wesley Wierson6, Sara E Charley7, Maura McGrail8, Jeffrey Essner9, Christopher K Tuggle10, Jason W Ross11.   

Abstract

The ability to efficiently introduce site-specific genetic modifications to the mammalian genome has been dramatically improved with the use of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. CRISPR/Cas9 is a powerful tool used to generate genetic modifications by causing double-strand breaks (DSBs) in DNA. Artemis (ART; also known as DCLRE1C), is a nuclear protein and is essential for DSB end joining in DNA repair via the canonical non-homologous end joining (c-NHEJ) pathway. In this work, we tested whether ART deficiency affects DNA repair following CRISPR/Cas9 induced DSBs in somatic cells. We also demonstrated the effect of microinjection timing on embryo developmental ability and gene targeting efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 system to disrupt the interleukin 2 receptor subunit gamma (IL2RG) locus using porcine in vitro fertilization (IVF) and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) derived embryos. In comparison to non-injected controls, CRISPR/Cas9 injection of IVF derived zygotes at 4 h and 8 h after fertilization did not impact cleavage and blastocyst rate. Gene modification rate was observed to be higher, 53.3% (9/16) in blastocysts injected 4 h post-fertilization as compared to 11.1% (1/9) in blastocysts injected 8 h post-fertilization. Microinjection 8 h after chemical activation of SCNT derived embryos decreased blastocyst development rate compared to non-injected controls but showed a higher gene modification efficiency of 66.7% as compared to 25% in the 4 h post-activation injection group. Furthermore, we observed that male ART-/- and ART+/- porcine fetal fibroblast (pFF) cells showed lower modification rates (2.5% and 1.9%, respectively) as compared to the ART intact cell line (8.3%). Interestingly, the female ART-/- and ART+/- pFF cells had modification rates (4.2% and 10.1%, respectively) similar to those seen in the ART intact cells. This study demonstrates the complex effect of various parameters such as microinjection timing and ART deficiency on gene editing efficiency in in vitro derived porcine embryos.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artemis; CRISPR/Cas9; Gene editing; Microinjection; Porcine

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34004455      PMCID: PMC8243557          DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  43 in total

Review 1.  Differential usage of non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination in double strand break repair.

Authors:  Eiichiro Sonoda; Helfrid Hochegger; Alihossein Saberi; Yoshihito Taniguchi; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-06-27

2.  Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated biallelic gene disruption and site-specific knockin after rapid selection of highly active sgRNAs in pigs.

Authors:  Xianlong Wang; Jinwei Zhou; Chunwei Cao; Jiaojiao Huang; Tang Hai; Yanfang Wang; Qiantao Zheng; Hongyong Zhang; Guosong Qin; Xiangnan Miao; Hongmei Wang; Suizhong Cao; Qi Zhou; Jianguo Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Chronological and cytological details of fertilization and early embryonic development in the domestic pig, Sus scrofa.

Authors:  R H Hunter
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1974-02

Review 4.  The molecular basis of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency: defective cytokine receptor signaling.

Authors:  W J Leonard
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 13.739

5.  Small RNA profile of the cumulus-oocyte complex and early embryos in the pig.

Authors:  Cai-Xia Yang; Zhi-Qiang Du; Elane C Wright; Max F Rothschild; Randall S Prather; Jason W Ross
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  Interleukin-2 receptor gamma chain mutation results in X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency in humans.

Authors:  M Noguchi; H Yi; H M Rosenblatt; A H Filipovich; S Adelstein; W S Modi; O W McBride; W J Leonard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-04-09       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Zygote injection of CRISPR/Cas9 RNA successfully modifies the target gene without delaying blastocyst development or altering the sex ratio in pigs.

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Joshua A Benne; Lee D Spate; Stephanie L Murphy; Melissa S Samuel; Clifton N Murphy; Jürgen A Richt; Eric Walters; Randall S Prather; Kevin D Wells
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 2.788

8.  Precision engineering for PRRSV resistance in pigs: Macrophages from genome edited pigs lacking CD163 SRCR5 domain are fully resistant to both PRRSV genotypes while maintaining biological function.

Authors:  Christine Burkard; Simon G Lillico; Elizabeth Reid; Ben Jackson; Alan J Mileham; Tahar Ait-Ali; C Bruce A Whitelaw; Alan L Archibald
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system.

Authors:  Woong Y Hwang; Yanfang Fu; Deepak Reyon; Morgan L Maeder; Shengdar Q Tsai; Jeffry D Sander; Randall T Peterson; J-R Joanna Yeh; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Novel Engraftment and T Cell Differentiation of Human Hematopoietic Cells in ART -/- IL2RG -/Y SCID Pigs.

Authors:  Adeline N Boettcher; Yunsheng Li; Amanda P Ahrens; Matti Kiupel; Kristen A Byrne; Crystal L Loving; A Giselle Cino-Ozuna; Jayne E Wiarda; Malavika Adur; Blythe Schultz; Jack J Swanson; Elizabeth M Snella; Chak-Sum Sam Ho; Sara E Charley; Zoe E Kiefer; Joan E Cunnick; Ellie J Putz; Giuseppe Dell'Anna; Jackie Jens; Swanand Sathe; Frederick Goldman; Erik R Westin; Jack C M Dekkers; Jason W Ross; Christopher K Tuggle
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 7.561

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  "Genetic scissors" CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing cutting-edge biocarrier technology for bone and cartilage repair.

Authors:  Chao Li; Yawei Du; Tongtong Zhang; Haoran Wang; Zhiyong Hou; Yingze Zhang; Wenguo Cui; Wei Chen
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-10-07

Review 2.  Delivering the CRISPR/Cas9 system for engineering gene therapies: Recent cargo and delivery approaches for clinical translation.

Authors:  Ruth A Foley; Ruby A Sims; Emily C Duggan; Jessica K Olmedo; Rachel Ma; Steven J Jonas
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.